Quote from: LDP on March 08, 2015, 12:37:51 AMIt only applies to pcp air rifles. If you have a .177 thats set at 12 fpe and a .22 set at 12 fpe the .22 will use less air to achieve 12 fpe.Ok I'd tend to agree if you are just talking air usage efficiency.
It only applies to pcp air rifles. If you have a .177 thats set at 12 fpe and a .22 set at 12 fpe the .22 will use less air to achieve 12 fpe.
Can't really agree for the shooting he's outlining...10-25 yards on birds. Would agree with a 12 foot pound .177 for all around use, but that specific task, don't see the real advantage of trajectory. Would certainly prefer the .177 for use outside that shed/barn where the range might stretch a bit.
Since you already have the 177 parts, why not set it up in 177 and try it first?If you decide it isn't enough, you can spend the time and money and convert to 22 caliber.If it were for squirrels or out in the wind, I'd for sure go with the bigger caliber - even bigger. But for birds, the 177 is very effective. As long as I hit the bird with my 177, it is dead. Obviously, accuracy is most important. And there will be less damage to your barns with an 8 grain 177 pellet.Ray
1. Low energy means low velocity. Low velocity means you can't expect even expanding pellets to really expand.2. Wad cutters lose speed fast in air. They also loose speed fast in every other semi-soft substance (including pigeons), so they deposit their energy quicky.3. Going back to #1, can usually find a wad cutter that shoots well at these speeds (not true of really fast guns).4. Avoid misses if you want to avoid patching holes.
Quote from: Regular Guy .25 on March 08, 2015, 01:40:01 AMAt 12 fpe and under, I think .177 is the clear winner.I agree. I'd prefer 8 grains at 830 fps over 14.3 grains at 615 fps. But 14.3g 22 cal at 830 wins over even 10 grain 177 at 830 fps.I'm glad I'm not limited to 12 fpe.Ray
At 12 fpe and under, I think .177 is the clear winner.