The seal from PA is the same as the one from ARH.
Looking at your numbers in first post again it makes me wonder what Hatsan used to come up with 750fps. That # never seemed right to me as my gun in .22 pushes 875fps with 18.1 grain. Is the .25 H&N 19.9 grain a new pellet? Maybe they used the 24 grain H&N for reported power. I would assume with a new seal and lube it would push the 19.9 grain near 850 fps no problem. That makes for a nice trajectory in .25 cal if that pellet is accurate at distance.
I agree the piston seal should not look like that, but it is pretty typical. Not just with Hatsan, but several brands of airguns in a bargain priced rifle. I'd say your numbers are not bad considering, but they will improve immensely after the proper de-bur you did and a fresh piston seal and proper lube. I would also shim the breech seal with a few loops of dental floss. I have had guns pass the tissue test, with a decent spread and accuracy, still shoot harder after ahimming the breech seal. It can't hurt.
Quote from: Gut2Fish on February 24, 2016, 05:30:45 PMLooking at your numbers in first post again it makes me wonder what Hatsan used to come up with 750fps. That # never seemed right to me as my gun in .22 pushes 875fps with 18.1 grain. Is the .25 H&N 19.9 grain a new pellet? Maybe they used the 24 grain H&N for reported power. I would assume with a new seal and lube it would push the 19.9 grain near 850 fps no problem. That makes for a nice trajectory in .25 cal if that pellet is accurate at distance.The part that frosts my tomatoes is that the seal is so obviously defective that it should have been tossed in the trash in Izmir. QC is something I have become accustomed to being disappointed from most manufacturer. If I shortcut someone in my business, that customer will tell at least ten people before it fizzles out, and that equates to lost business. That's something that big companies fail to embrace in their business philosophies. For them it's a numbers game, and it really doesn't bother them. Hatsan USA has that cocky attitude, presuming the end user is an idiot (I'm a mechanical. Engineer by education, but own a small renovation/handyman business to keep me busy since I retired) I've been around the block with them on Optima scopes. I finally just gave up on them and just order a real airgun scope when I get a new gun. Enough for the rant.
Quote from: JoeV on February 24, 2016, 06:08:30 PMQuote from: Gut2Fish on February 24, 2016, 05:30:45 PMLooking at your numbers in first post again it makes me wonder what Hatsan used to come up with 750fps. That # never seemed right to me as my gun in .22 pushes 875fps with 18.1 grain. Is the .25 H&N 19.9 grain a new pellet? Maybe they used the 24 grain H&N for reported power. I would assume with a new seal and lube it would push the 19.9 grain near 850 fps no problem. That makes for a nice trajectory in .25 cal if that pellet is accurate at distance.The part that frosts my tomatoes is that the seal is so obviously defective that it should have been tossed in the trash in Izmir. QC is something I have become accustomed to being disappointed from most manufacturer. If I shortcut someone in my business, that customer will tell at least ten people before it fizzles out, and that equates to lost business. That's something that big companies fail to embrace in their business philosophies. For them it's a numbers game, and it really doesn't bother them. Hatsan USA has that cocky attitude, presuming the end user is an idiot (I'm a mechanical. Engineer by education, but own a small renovation/handyman business to keep me busy since I retired) I've been around the block with them on Optima scopes. I finally just gave up on them and just order a real airgun scope when I get a new gun. Enough for the rant. You're entitled to rant, but I doubt that seal was bad when they installed it. Hatsan seems to always find a way to get cuttings or shavings into the compression tube on the 125's, and sometimes the 95's. Also could have a burr at the transfer port at the end of the compression chamber...
Look closely at the image and you'll see it's not damage from a burr, but is a molding defect. All of,the edges ar smooth, not ragged from being torn. I've seen defects like this in injection molding machines when insufficient material is injected into the mold (short shot). The tube is actually in pristine condition, and with the filing and crocus cloth polishing of edges, the new seal should have no problems. Friday will tell.
Quote from: JoeV on February 24, 2016, 02:28:00 PMThe seal from PA is the same as the one from ARH.... or it just looks the same.Steve (scp52) suggested in another thread to chamfer the inside side of the transfer port slightly to make sure it is burr free, and I've also seen suggestions saying put the seal in (very) hot water a minute or two to make it easier to install.Good luck, looking forward to seeing it shooting and your posting the results
Joe, you made me actually sign up instead of just lurking . Sorry to see the piston seal issue, that's a bummer on a new gun. I just got a 125 synthetic springer on Monday in .25. My numbers are not too far off of yours. I cleaned the bbl with ballistol, pushed a pellet through it to check the rifling (will likely hand lap with JB paste over the weekend) and put about 30 shots across the chrony. I don't have my sheet but the Benjamin domes were high 600s, JSB Exacts around 715ish, and the H&N FTTs around 790-805. This was the first 30 shots...