I have the Walther PPK, Umarex S.A. 177 Glock, and Sig P226 X-Five. I got my eye on the new Colt Peacemaker.
I like it. Feels just like my real P229. It actually weights 2oz's more than my P229. Can be fired both single and double action. Has as good recoil to it.
I've had it for over a year and put about 1000 rounds through it and it still looks good. I keep it in a old camera bag I have so it's not just laying around getting banged up. I'm sure if I had a holster for it to practice drawing it would wear quickly.
WOW it fits right in my P229 holster. Snaps right in just like it was made for it.
I have never gotten into the replica airgun thing. Personally, I like air guns because they are airguns, not because they imitate (in looks only, from far away) some firearm or another. I think I have been turned off by the few replicas I have held. Parts that are supposed to move on the original firearms just sit there, molded into the replica. They just look and feel so fake, like a toy. And every replica trigger I have fired, ugh, horrible ... totally horrible. It's like designers have mandated that replicas have the worst triggers possible.Also, I have a lot of firearms so I don't necessarily want a replica of something I already have that's the original. I reload everything so ammo is not a problem. But I like air guns too. My last two trips to the range I took nothing but air guns. They don't look anything like a firearm. They look like airguns. Which is fine with me. Firearms and air guns are both great. One doesn't need to try to imitate the other, IMHO.
So before you start looking down your nose at something, you might want to ask yourself what you would do if a replica was all you could afford.
Quote from: silent_airman on January 29, 2015, 10:27:21 AMSo before you start looking down your nose at something, you might want to ask yourself what you would do if a replica was all you could afford.I'm not looking down my nose at anything. I'm sorry if you got that impression. I was just stating my preference for "an air gun that is an airgun". The replicas I have held, admittedly inexpensive ones, have failed in the airgun part of things. They were terrible airguns (the specific ones I have shot - the cheap ones - I cannot comment on others). I was only commenting on my lack of desire for something that shoots poorly that is trying, usually unsuccessfully, to look like something else. It has nothing to do with the expense of the thing. I have a cheap Beeman P17 and cheap Crosman 1377. They both shoot exceptionally well IMHO. But they're not trying to replicate the look of something else. They look like themselves. I'm into function over aesthetics, not aesthetics over function. Regardless of price point. I said nothing about price, nor did I look down my nose trying to imply somebody was poor or anything like that. I'm sorry you took it that way, but that's not what I said.
A word to the wise (someone had to say it):I have a Beretta 92FS air pistol that is virtually identical to its 9mm big brother. This gun is a work of art and a joy to own and shoot - I love this gun. But I treat it with the same respect that I would a real fire arm. I exercise safety measures and precautions as required by law and as dictated by common sense. Because it looks so realistic, I am especially careful to avoid displaying the gun to an open public in fear that it might be mistaken for the real thing (which it most certainly would). On the other hand, I am proud to show and share it in private with trusted friends. It is a great conversation piece and an accurate shooter and something that I will pass on to my son someday. Although replica air guns are far less deadly than fire arm counterparts, if misused they can get you just as dead. As for me, I see more replicas in my future.AR
Sig is starting to produce pellet firing co2 and PCP guns built on the AR-15 design.They used a belt fed magazine.Available in .177, 22, and .25http://www.airgundepot.com/shot-show-2015-sig-airguns-stoeger-airguns-article.html