I have one of these stocks and have AR's as well and I don't think the ergonomics on the ar are any better. you would also end up with a lot of extra weight. I know at this point he has already answered this question before and said that he was not making an ar style stock for these.
Quote from: jvanschoonhoven on March 26, 2015, 12:39:31 AMI have one of these stocks and have AR's as well and I don't think the ergonomics on the ar are any better. you would also end up with a lot of extra weight. I know at this point he has already answered this question before and said that he was not making an ar style stock for these.Ergonomics is a personal thing. I dont think there would be any extra weight. But maybe one day if there is enough demand for it. Or I get rich and have a custom stock made.
What happened?Do we have a gun that will shoot decent groups yet or are we still trying to get there?
This is 5 shots @ 15 yards to get a baseline before cf sleeving.I will also be developing Millennium specific slugs - the group dispersion of my slugs is clearly barrel harmonics.Scope is a simple 4x Bug Buster and the bench was wobbly - we are building a concrete 50 yard shooting test range right now on Jim's property.More to come in a few days...I'm finally shooting *Our* prototype!!!
I put my Center point 4-16x40 on the test rifle - I used UTG quick release rings that came with my Bug Buster scope.I set up at 50 yards on the hood of my Jeep and shot a couple of groups...It wasn't the best rest as it was still a bit wobbly...The average at a lasered 50 yards was 1/2" - 3/4" with Kings.This is just the barrel screwed into the breech - the groups were strung vertically and most had 3 pellets all touching then a couple high or low.I'm going to have to wait until I get to my actual range with the rifle before I do anymore longer range testing..
Here's the first 50 yard group shot off the hood of my Jeep - Kings @ 905 fps @ 1800 psi.I will post more groups as we prep the barrels...
That group is at least quarter size and I guarantee it was the best one out of all the groups.
Quote from: dyotat100 on April 04, 2015, 06:53:49 PMThat group is at least quarter size and I guarantee it was the best one out of all the groups.dyotat100, you make a valid observation.The group in the image might be approaching a quarter (.955-in.) vs a nickel (.835-in.)However, I was referring to Mike's quote - not the photo.In a hunting situation ... the difference between a nickel and a quarter in accuracy at 50-ydsI don't think would make any difference at all in the field - at least from my shooting/hunting experience.What is apparent ... more trial shooting and tweaking are needed - this takes time.Any person familiar with product design/engineering, testing/development and production would anticipate as suchand appreciate as much during final product development .I have a background in Engineering, Manufacturing and Machining - I'm not surprised.Mike needs more time to dial-in the Millenium Pumper ... some patience would be in-order.