HW/Beeman question?

[RickyDon]

I just got an HW30s deluxe from Straight Shooters yesterday. I really like this gun. I through a scope on it and have put pellets down range. I was going to wait for the R7 to come in but decided to go with the HW. I am not disappointed. I was concerned about the stock not covering the pivot joint but I looks great and shoots like a dream. So far the best accuracy is with the Crossman Premier Lights in the box.

[palonej]

Ummmmm I think pics would be in order......no one will believe you otherwise!!
Enjoy that new beauty!!

[Oldgringo]

Ummmmm I think pics would be in order......no one will believe you otherwise!!
Enjoy that new beauty!!

I agree....

[Wunderwerks]

I have been strongly considering either an R7 or HW30 for my close in targets (10 to 15 yds) and keeping my D350 for the 25 to 35 yds.  In talking to one of the sales reps at one of the popular AG suppliers, he told me that if I am used to shooting with the D350, I will probably be sorely disappointed with either the R7 or HW30.  They will probably feel like a Daisy Red Rider in my hands.  I went ahead and ordered a Vortek PG2 kit based on this forum's feedback and thought I would see how much of a change this makes on the D350 and hold off a decision on the Beeman or Weihrauch.   

[oldwolf]

He sounds like a person that would also think you need a centerfire magnum to harvest a deer. Or maybe he has never shot a .22 before. I have a HW30 and a Diana 52 for comparison. The 30S I would say has a very high build quality and a fantastic trigger. My RWS on the other hand has good build quality and a decent T05 trigger. They are two completely different beasts imo. The HW 30 is more like a target grade .22 and the 52 is like a sporter .22 Mag. Plus the 30 is so sweet and relaxing to fire. Its fairly quiet and very accurate. The 52 is difficult to shoot accurate imo.

Anyway, you should get that HW30 and if you really don't like it I am sure it will sell quickly on this forum.

Good luck and sorry if I am perceived to have come on too strong on this topic.

[Wunderwerks]

Not at all.  That's why I appreciate everyone's input.  With the variety of AG that everyone has, the sales rep's response sounded a little off base.  Mainly implying that if you were used to shooting a higher velocity AG, you would be not be happy with the lower velocity.  This line of thought is contrary to what a lot of the members here have shown in the AG inventories.

[Oldgringo]

He sounds like a person that would also think you need a centerfire magnum to harvest a deer. Or maybe he has never shot a .22 before. I have a HW30 and a Diana 52 for comparison. The 30S I would say has a very high build quality and a fantastic trigger. My RWS on the other hand has good build quality and a decent T05 trigger. They are two completely different beasts imo. The HW 30 is more like a target grade .22 and the 52 is like a sporter .22 Mag. Plus the 30 is so sweet and relaxing to fire. Its fairly quiet and very accurate. The 52 is difficult to shoot accurate imo.

Anyway, you should get that HW30 and if you really don't like it I am sure it will sell quickly on this forum.

Good luck and sorry if I am perceived to have come on too strong on this topic.

I agree with what I think you're saying, bigger is not automatically better (some would disagree).  My Diana 52 is beautiful and accurate, but its weight and the cocking effort may make it my least favorite air rifle.  I'm looking forward to acquiring another Daisy Avanti 853 before month's end and a R 7 as soon as they become available again.  I neither need nor want an air cannon to punch paper in the backyard.

[JimL911]

I agree with what I think you're saying, bigger is not automatically better (some would disagree). I neither need nor want an air cannon to punch paper in the backyard.

Too true. Lower powered guns are just a joy to shoot. There are too many people that want powder power in an air rifle. They need to accept the guns for what they are and use the proper tool for the job at hand.