Author Topic: is it weird to wonder why some people spend so much on some springers? (Read 10431 times))

Tyrantblade · « **on:** February 25, 2013, 07:45:10 PM »

when at the cost some of them are at, and the clear advantages PCP's have that may be a better choice? i mean i know the start up cost can be expensive, but when some springers are at $600+ you have to wonder why people would spend so much on the older technology.

gandalfretlaw · « **Reply #1 on:** February 25, 2013, 08:09:56 PM »

A springer is a more zen weapon. PCPs are fun to shoot but ultimately require much more than the weapon itself. Meanwhile pump up gun has drawbacks as well. Probably a high pressure pump up like a Discovery would be nice but you have to carry a pump. With a springer, it's one effort, one shot. Much like with a bow or crossbow. If you miss or need another shot you simply cock again.

In a SHTF situation I can hit the field with ten thousand rounds of ammo and my rifle slung to my back.

Paul68 · « **Reply #2 on:** February 25, 2013, 08:13:41 PM »

I think its much like with Bows. You have recurve lovers, longbow fans, and then guys who wont go near it unless it has a set of pully's. I have yet to invest in any one rifle over $350, but if I do I imagine it will be a top of the line springer just so I can say I have one, and of course hopefully experience what the high end guns are supposed to be like;)

robert w · « **Reply #3 on:** February 25, 2013, 08:37:43 PM »

to me its like seein somebody carring an oxygen bottle everywhere they go . i prefer pellets and spring gun only . but that is why i do it like i do

Bryan Heimann · « **Reply #4 on:** February 25, 2013, 09:00:12 PM »

For that $600 what are you getting? Take a look at the TX200. Youve got PCP accuracy (better than some), close to pcp power (17 fpe in .22, 16 fpe in .177) and I can't say from experience but they say no hold sensitivity. Match trigger, beautiful stock, quiet as an hw30, excellent craftsmanship and engineering. And it doesn't require a tank or pump, some prefer it untuned as well. Sounds like you're getting your money's worth to me. It's heavy but most of it's proponents prefer the heft for stable shooting positions.

Nomadic Pirate · « **Reply #5 on:** February 25, 2013, 09:14:55 PM »

PCPs for hunting.

Springers (prefer Nitro Pistons) for plesurfull target shooting.

xsquad · « **Reply #6 on:** February 25, 2013, 10:09:05 PM »

Good question and I thought long and hard on what would be my first quality airgun Rws 48 or Rws 56 big difference in price, well I bought the rws 56 $645 and the Hawke 6.5 20x42 $429
so I have over $1000 invested and don't regret the cost at all I love my springer!

s10gto · « **Reply #7 on:** February 25, 2013, 10:35:33 PM »

I perfer the no support equipment. Will I someday buy a PCP? Most likely but I love my springer's.

Oh and BTW PCP's are old technology.

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=lewis%20and%20clark%20air%20rifle&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&sqi=2&ved=0CC4QtwIwAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D-pqFyKh-rUI&ei=Rx0sUfGSDqHj0gHQ1YGwDQ&usg=AFQjCNHM7COHg9aRf2pOE_ssVLNhZhlAVg

pappa · « **Reply #8 on:** February 25, 2013, 10:47:02 PM »

To many, including me, it's a matter of convenience, reliability, utility and ease of use. My springers do everything I want them to do and more. I keep a couple by the front and rear doors of the house and if a varmint shows up, I simply pick up a rifle (which I keep preloaded with a pellet in the chamber), cock it and drop the critter. Put another pellet in the chamber and ready for the next chance. No extra thought or effort needed!

Same thing if I go to the field. Always ready to go and nothing extra required.

No extra equipment needed for maintaining air pressure, transferring air cartridges etc., no extra cost for maintaining all the extras I don't need.

I know what all my rifles can do and I know what I can do with them and I am extremely happy with that. Why do you question our choices with a lot of burdensome questioning?

jimmie lee · « **Reply #9 on:** February 25, 2013, 10:59:13 PM »

Quote from: Nomadic Pirate on February 25, 2013, 09:14:55 PM

PCPs for hunting.

Springers (prefer Nitro Pistons) for pleasurful target shooting.

What Manny said...I have two good PCP's and two good springers. When I get tired of pumping when I do target shooting with the PCP's I switch to springers and rediscover the freedom of shooting hundreds of rounds without being burdened by an umbilical cord. I love them both and both platforms are unique.

Dave1899 · « **Reply #10 on:** February 25, 2013, 11:22:40 PM »

It's the addiction...Most folks start cheap but as the learning curve develops and the hobby grows, they start wanting what ever they decide is better and more fun. Then they end up with quite a collection. Don't ask me how I know.

02stampede · « **Reply #11 on:** February 25, 2013, 11:43:07 PM »

I shoot springers most of the time because they are convenient and self sufficient. There is a lot to be said for not having to lug a tank or a pump around. So for me, it makes sense to invest in a quality spring gun.

George · « **Reply #12 on:** February 26, 2013, 12:26:43 AM »

I shoot both Springers and PcPs but there is something about the feel of cocking a butter smooth tuned spring gun with a vibration free "Tunk" that follows when the trigger is pulled.It is a very pleasant feeling!!! It is like " bet you can't take only one bite".

Motorhead · « **Reply #13 on:** February 26, 2013, 12:39:05 AM »

Quote from: Tyrantblade on February 25, 2013, 07:45:10 PM

when at the cost some of them are at, and the clear advantages PCP's have that may be a better choice? i mean i know the start up cost can be expensive, but when some springers are at $600+ you have to wonder why people would spend so much on the older technology.

Same reason ( One would think ? ) why there are those Old School nostalgia Hot Rod car buffs that want vintage cars with big block rat engines !! ..... when a much more refined modern turbo charged car sets you into your seat just as HARD, runs as fast and likely Faster ! ... actually handles better too go figure, while offering better fuel mileage.

Yet ... you won't talk the Old School crown into believing newer techs any better !!

They BOTH launch LEAD, speed can be +/- nearly the same .... Ones old school simple that with some basic lovin will run for years !! .... Other is higher maintenance, needs support equipment that also needs support equipment for it too be able in operating at all.

See a pattern here

breakfastchef · « **Reply #14 on:** February 26, 2013, 01:00:17 AM »

I never have to worry about where my next fill is coming from, plotting velocities, shot counts, 'sweet spots', psi, how many shots I have left, hammer/spring adjustments, velocity adjustments, $600 compressors, or $400 tanks with a springer. All I have to do is cock, load and shoot all day long.

JimL911 · « **Reply #15 on:** February 26, 2013, 02:03:39 AM »

What else needs to be said. Simplicity, no ancillary equipment needed and PCP like accuracy.

GunnerAl · « **Reply #16 on:** February 26, 2013, 02:17:07 AM »

Like some,, having owned both (still do) I will always consider the true airgun to be the one with with springs in them.. Why?? It's nothing to do with which has been around the longest or any other technical answers, it's simply that you grab your gun and a container of pellets and wander around all day enjoying the hobby of airgunning. You are a on your own, independent of the world around you. You can go almost anywhere and still just load and fire. No cannisters, no hoses or bottles and gauges etc...

That's not to say I consider the PCP an intruder in the hobby. Far from it.. It has it good points like no recoil, power beyond the black rainbow etc. I will always have a PCP or two up my sleeve but if I was forced to choose, I'd be scratching my head awful hard. The springer is very independent and that means a bit of security in your hobby...

I have a foot in both camps...

Cathartes · « **Reply #17 on:** February 26, 2013, 08:31:40 AM »

There is more pure pleasure for me in shooting PCP guns, but I do enjoy the challenge of a springer. I also feel like they add more to the sport of field target. Getting your springer shooting really smooth and mastering the recoil, getting zen and dropping those targets is supremely satisfying.

Remo · « **Reply #18 on:** February 26, 2013, 09:08:34 AM »

I suppose a quick answer to the question would be "Because they felt like it". I don't think anyone here feels the need to justify their choice of airguns. My own personal justification is simple -- I luv 'em all!

thekid · « **Reply #19 on:** February 26, 2013, 09:40:24 AM »

Too me that question is kinda like....
Why swim, when you can float or why run, when you can walk.
The springer is more difficult to use, your skills have to be so much better, so why not a quality springer if so inclined.
Sometimes its not the destination that matters, its the journey along the way.

I love all my rifles, my springers will always be in my collection, they are an aquired taste to master.

Thank you to our advertisers!

is it weird to wonder why some people spend so much on some springers?

Author Topic: is it weird to wonder why some people spend so much on some springers? (Read 10431 times))

Nomadic Pirate