crosman m417 happy owner!

[Crosshairs]

Still no problems with mine.
                           Mike 

[Lambchops]

Too much plastic on these. A 2100 is a much better buy.

[Crosshairs]

Too much plastic on these. A 2100 is a much better buy.

Thats your opinion do you have a M417 have you ever shot a M417.

[Lambchops]

Too much plastic on these. A 2100 is a much better buy.

Thats your opinion do you have a M417 have you ever shot a M417.

Yes, I HAD one, then promplty returned it a few days later.

[Crosshairs]

Too much plastic on these. A 2100 is a much better buy.

Thats your opinion do you have a M417 have you ever shot a M417.

Yes, I HAD one, then promplty returned it a few days later.

You must have got a lemon or abused it.Some people hold it wrong and break off the stock and blame the gun or dont no how to shoot and blame the gun. I have no problems at all. And i own a 2100 and a 2200 yeah there not plastic but dont look as cool as the M417.
                         Mike

[Lambchops]

Too much plastic on these. A 2100 is a much better buy.

Thats your opinion do you have a M417 have you ever shot a M417.

Yes, I HAD one, then promplty returned it a few days later.

You must have got a lemon or abused it.Some people hold it wrong and break off the stock and blame the gun or dont no how to shoot and blame the gun. I have no problems at all. And i own a 2100 and a 2200 yeah there not plastic but dont look as cool as the M417.
                         Mike

There was nothing wrong with it and it shot fine. I just didn't like that it was all plastic and aluminum insides. It felt flimsy and cheap.

[Crosshairs]

Sorry to hear that well thats why they make so many different guns but at least we agree that shooting air guns is a blast.
                                     mike

[Daveman]

I'd buy one of these in a heartbeat if it used CO2. All Crosman has to do is take the internals of the 1077 and give it the M4 body. Crosman would sell so many of these guns if they did something like that.