Yes. The process by which airguns became legal in Texas was a fiasco. You ought to be able to find some archived posts about it here. Texas had basically moved to adopt Florida’s permissive airgun rules. Then a well connected rancher, a vocal minority of (IMHO) snobbish airgunners, and possibly a company from the airgun industry, all lobbied to jack the requirements higher and the current rules are an attempted compromise.
I never shot a coon or a muskrat when I lived in Texas. In those days air rifles were legal to use on public small game tracts along with .22 rimfires shooting BB or CB caps. I'm trying to think of a commercial .22lr cartridge that produces 215 fpe?
Well, that's gonna limit your airgunning LOL
Wow. So you need 60% more power than the average rimfire 22LR HV to hunt small game with airguns? Has 22LR been outlawed in TX for hunting now? Even the CCI Stinger @ 1,640fps does not get 215fpe. What genius came up with that number? Anyone can take the biggest raccoons using a mid-high power Springer (15 to 24 FPE) with a head shot, and many have, including myself and hundreds of others here over the years (don't even need a PCP). Dan, I am not aware of a Hyper-velocity 39gr in 22LR, or any 22LR making 215fpe. Who produces this 22LR 39gr round? Or where you just showing what it takes to reach 215fpe? I am pretty sure you 'd need to upgrade to 22 WMR or 17 HMR to produce that much kinetic energy.
Quote from: only1harry on July 14, 2020, 01:17:49 AMWow. So you need 60% more power than the average rimfire 22LR HV to hunt small game with airguns? Has 22LR been outlawed in TX for hunting now? Even the CCI Stinger @ 1,640fps does not get 215fpe. What genius came up with that number? Anyone can take the biggest raccoons using a mid-high power Springer (15 to 24 FPE) with a head shot, and many have, including myself and hundreds of others here over the years (don't even need a PCP). Dan, I am not aware of a Hyper-velocity 39gr in 22LR, or any 22LR making 215fpe. Who produces this 22LR 39gr round? Or where you just showing what it takes to reach 215fpe? I am pretty sure you 'd need to upgrade to 22 WMR or 17 HMR to produce that much kinetic energy.What basically happened is that Texas came up with a minimum FPE for deer and then that was applied across the board to varmints as well. All stemming from some people, including air gunners, trying to roadblock use of .30 calibers for deer or otherwise not being happy about airgun deer hunting at all. And them trying to whisper it all to a commission of non-airgunner rulemakers. The cloud that the anti-.30 and anti-deer hunting airgunners kicked up scared the commissioners so bad that one of them wanted to scrap the entire endeavor so minimum FPE requirements akin to a .22 mag were adopted as a compromise measure to keep air-gunning on the table. This is why I get aggravated with the self-righteous types when it comes to FPE and caliber questions for airgun hunting. I’m all for people having differing opinions. But when the FPE/caliber Gestapo starts a whispering campaign its mucks things up for all airgun hunters that goes beyond hunting one particular species.
I want to know what air gun manufacturer did this or had a hand in it, I’m betting the office is in Dallas Ft Worth.
I hope that Thurmond of T3P Ranch can respond to this, he followed it closely and actually went to the hearings.It seems like it was just an attempt to shoe-horn airguns into existing legislation without too much bother. Now we add airguns to firearms, black powder, archery and crossbows.The existing rules for game animals was simply stated as "any centerfire". So something like a 32-20 Winchester, also known as .32 WCF (Winchester center fire) could be used. The 32-20 is about 215 FPE (292 joules)I think that rule was made long ago to prevent 22LR from being used for deer. Keep in mind that legislators, and the interns who actually draft the language of the law may have little to no knowledge of hunting.I recall that there was a hunt organized to demonstrate the effectiveness of airguns by hunting pigs, which are considered pest animals. Someone came with a 30 caliber springer that only wounded a pig and that only angered the lawmaker.
Quote from: HunterWhite on July 15, 2020, 12:09:11 PMI hope that Thurmond of T3P Ranch can respond to this, he followed it closely and actually went to the hearings.It seems like it was just an attempt to shoe-horn airguns into existing legislation without too much bother. Now we add airguns to firearms, black powder, archery and crossbows.The existing rules for game animals was simply stated as "any centerfire". So something like a 32-20 Winchester, also known as .32 WCF (Winchester center fire) could be used. The 32-20 is about 215 FPE (292 joules)I think that rule was made long ago to prevent 22LR from being used for deer. Keep in mind that legislators, and the interns who actually draft the language of the law may have little to no knowledge of hunting.I recall that there was a hunt organized to demonstrate the effectiveness of airguns by hunting pigs, which are considered pest animals. Someone came with a 30 caliber springer that only wounded a pig and that only angered the lawmaker. No, with respect, that isn’t what happened at all. I remember the testimony. There was no .30 springer involved that was mentioned. Supposedly some rancher hosted a PCP hog hunt with all manner of big bores including .45s and described all sorts of wounded pig carn-agewith a range of guns we would all recognize as being adequate if not overkill for hogs. In listening to the testimony, it was likely exaggerated to the point of being fabricated. The witness was the rancher’s guide and he sounded as sleezy as he could be. They obviously just had an anti-airgun agenda, and none of it had to do with deer anyhow or would have been effected by the change in regulations because hogs were already fully open to airguns and the new regs didn’t change how hogs could be hunted. Let me put it this way. As having over a decade’s experience as a trial attorney and after have won many dozens of jury trials, if that ranch hand would have been my star witness for trial, I would have dumped the case. He presented as a total sleezebag and any experienced airgun hog hunter on this forum who listened to his testimony would have found it to be a load a bunk. The rancher really sounded like Boss Hog and the guide like Rosco. It was Southern good’ol boy politics at its worst. But the real issue wasn’t just some rich rancher who had the back-door ear of one of the commissioners. You had a minority of airguns writing and calling in saying “dang right that ain’t enough gun for deer hunting.” And so it gave the anti-airgunners something to latch on to. That’s my biggest beef with how it played out.