Quote from: Luis Leon on July 13, 2020, 07:44:31 AMNomad is right I miss the point on this one... I thought it was about the most versatile caliber. Not a theoretical “do all”. Caliber, and are you really going to drive down the .30 to sub 14 ft lbs?I would in my Leshiy.However, "Most Versatile caliber" would assume one thing and one thing only: the ability to handle the most situations.A .30 or .35 wins, hands down. Imagine the Nasty-Nine or Dirty-Thirty, a Leshiy tuned for ~ 40 FPE lobbing pellets at 520 FPS and utterly annihilating said squirrel's skulls. Zero meat wasted. Then grabbing a Texan, Rex, or similar in .35 (or .30 for that matter) and popping big-game with arrows. Clean heart-lung shots, no matter the size of the game, it drops and dies. Interject slugs for coup de grace.You guys talking about switching to powderburners or "for my needs" situations are simply being biased, which is okay, but truly misses the real point of the "most Versatile Airgun Caliber. The answer is the one that has the capacity to hunt, plink, or be used for targets. The simple fact both .30 and .35 are excelling at long range target competitions, clearly have a known advantage by offering slugs, bolts, and pellets, and perhaps most importantly can be tuned way down or way up (from springer-power levels up to "elk hunting") simply proves the .30 and .35 are ultimately the most versatile. Meaning having the most versatility, meaning able to be used in the most situations be it paper, pests, or filling the freezer.Some food for thought: my Leshiy has some of the cheapest barrel swapping from from .177 up through .20, .22, .25, .30, and .35. One of the most-subscribed pesting channels on YouTube has a gentleman who regularly used .30 and .35 pellets for backyard pesting by merging the Huma sub-12-FPE and high-output Huma regulators to achieve an efficient "low power" backyard friendly tune in .30 and .35. Pellets moving ~ 40 to 45 FPE. Given my propensity to buy airguns based on simply being the most versatile tool for the job, I think you can all understand why I still consider a choice like mine offering literally the most versatility especially since the .30 and .35 barrels extend capabilities into the Big-Bore arena. Will I shoot bolts once I get my .30 or .35 barrels? No idea. But there's no doubt in my mind the .30 and .35 are simply the most versatile calibers since pellets, slugs, and bolts can be shot whether tuned way down or way up.
Nomad is right I miss the point on this one... I thought it was about the most versatile caliber. Not a theoretical “do all”. Caliber, and are you really going to drive down the .30 to sub 14 ft lbs?
*Slowly scans the room for eyes, proceeds to remove spoon from pot* This stew is starting to taste bitter I mean, technically the question was 'What caliber do you think is the most versatile' which makes it subjective to each person who answers, no wrong answers in this thread except those who wanna debate... You guys are getting all hot and bothered over nothing more than a difference in personal opinion while viewing the question through a different lens. Ultimately, any answer provided in this thread isn't going to budge life's needle much in any way.
And while I respect the enumerated versatility of the .30. I just can’t see plinking or target shooting hundreds of rounds per day or week. That is cost prohibitive for me (snip)
Quote from: Luis Leon on July 13, 2020, 06:54:32 PMAnd while I respect the enumerated versatility of the .30. I just can’t see plinking or target shooting hundreds of rounds per day or week. That is cost prohibitive for me (snip)JSB 18.13 grain is not that cheap. Going by Airgun Depot's prices it is $19 for 500 or $57 for 2000:https://www.airgundepot.com/jsb-546287.htmlBallistic products gives you 1360 #1 buckshot (.300 cal) for $39 ----> https://www.ballisticproducts.com/Super-Buck-Lead-1-8-lb_jar-300/productinfo/SBK01/ (works out to be the same price per round as buying 2000 JSB pellets for $57)Now granted, some of the Ballistic products buckshot maybe be out of spec.....but even with that you are not very far ahead by buying JSB 4 tins at a time.P.S. Remington #1 buckshot is 2/3 the price per shot of the Ballistic Products #1 buckshot, but I haven't seen any reviews of it yet:https://www.precisionreloading.com/cart.php#!l=RM&i=S23774
Quote from: UnderPressure on July 13, 2020, 07:46:04 PMQuote from: Luis Leon on July 13, 2020, 06:54:32 PMAnd while I respect the enumerated versatility of the .30. I just can’t see plinking or target shooting hundreds of rounds per day or week. That is cost prohibitive for me (snip)JSB 18.13 grain is not that cheap. Going by Airgun Depot's prices it is $19 for 500 or $57 for 2000:https://www.airgundepot.com/jsb-546287.htmlBallistic products gives you 1360 #1 buckshot (.300 cal) for $39 ----> https://www.ballisticproducts.com/Super-Buck-Lead-1-8-lb_jar-300/productinfo/SBK01/ (works out to be the same price per round as buying 2000 JSB pellets for $57)Now granted, some of the Ballistic products buckshot maybe be out of spec.....but even with that you are not very far ahead by buying JSB 4 tins at a time.P.S. Remington #1 buckshot is 2/3 the price per shot of the Ballistic Products #1 buckshot, but I haven't seen any reviews of it yet:https://www.precisionreloading.com/cart.php#!l=RM&i=S23774I think I'm gonna order some of them roundballs since the .360 worked really well on the .357s
Quote from: Nomadic Pirate on July 12, 2020, 02:50:44 PMHow can .17 and .22 be more versatile ( going by the definition of versatile ) in a general sense ( Target or hunting ) .......then .30 or .357 ?Other then being cheaper ( which isn't a criteria in versatility ) they might have one advantage but then fall way behind in the broad spectrum of applications ( like long range target shooting for example )I understand " PERSONAL " preference or applications, but in a general sense, cover the spectrum on all applications .17 and .22 (maybe a very, very High power .22 with a ton of up and down adjustments can sneak in there but not your standard .22 ) cannot touch .30 or .357Would these targets still be useful after even one hit by a .40 projectile?NO
How can .17 and .22 be more versatile ( going by the definition of versatile ) in a general sense ( Target or hunting ) .......then .30 or .357 ?Other then being cheaper ( which isn't a criteria in versatility ) they might have one advantage but then fall way behind in the broad spectrum of applications ( like long range target shooting for example )I understand " PERSONAL " preference or applications, but in a general sense, cover the spectrum on all applications .17 and .22 (maybe a very, very High power .22 with a ton of up and down adjustments can sneak in there but not your standard .22 ) cannot touch .30 or .357
round balls? who would shoot round balls? back spin? thats more like airsoft stuff, cant back spin a lead ball i dont think
.50
OH, wow! I'd figure that could happen if muzzle report was too loud, but I wonder if they can hear the pellet cutting the air?