Quote from: Nomadic Pirate on July 09, 2020, 02:25:28 PMQuote from: Luis Leon on July 09, 2020, 02:10:42 PMThis thread is/was about the versatility of a caliber... not having one gun, or casting, smelting, melting, etc. Hands down it has to be the .22, no matter how much the .30 or .45 or even .50 are talked up... they definitely are not as versatile in a practical sense.Absolutely, .45 and .50 aren't versatile, like .177 and .22 limited to one side of the spectrum..30 isn't versatile in a practical sense ?In the sense that after I get home from work. And get to plinking and target shooting I’m not going to do it with a .30. I could just break out some CCI CBs if I wanted to shoot chunks of lead real slow. And after plinking and target shooting, I can go pesting or hunting with the same load out. No adjustments necessary...
Quote from: Luis Leon on July 09, 2020, 02:10:42 PMThis thread is/was about the versatility of a caliber... not having one gun, or casting, smelting, melting, etc. Hands down it has to be the .22, no matter how much the .30 or .45 or even .50 are talked up... they definitely are not as versatile in a practical sense.Absolutely, .45 and .50 aren't versatile, like .177 and .22 limited to one side of the spectrum..30 isn't versatile in a practical sense ?
This thread is/was about the versatility of a caliber... not having one gun, or casting, smelting, melting, etc. Hands down it has to be the .22, no matter how much the .30 or .45 or even .50 are talked up... they definitely are not as versatile in a practical sense.
Quote from: PikeP on July 09, 2020, 02:48:16 PMI don't care much for these kind of topics as they are controversial and stir the pot with peoples beliefs or feelings...the answer is so subjective. If you were to attempt to objectively answer this, you'd maybe say the most versatile should be whatever is middle ground, which allows the largest swing in energy variance to cover nearby calibers. If you were to answer this through the lens of which caliber is most practical in terms of cost and potential energy range it covers, then that answer shifts. If you were to answer this through the filter that omits cost/efficiency, you'll get another answer. If you have a minimum energy requirement that must be met to fit within this 'versatile' definition, well then that completely disqualifies many smaller calibers...you see where I am going? That said the obvious answer is .25 or .30 cal (joking)Quite right my friend, this type threads we need try keep them as objective as we can.this is what would happen if I turn it subjective ;I think the most versatile caliber is .357 !!!!well at "MY" house I can plink and target shoot .357 no problem, also I can target shoot for cheaper then .177 ....how so ?I can target shoot with arrows, and since arrows are reusable cost is ZERO ...cheaper then .177 My .357 with JSB pellet is perfect on mongoose ( Squirrel size game ) the high shoulder/neck shot waste no meat if you eat your kills, also Dove the neck shot don't waste meat, if you stray a bit with .177 you'll miss that spine, not with the .357 LOLThen I can hunt with arrows and I can take down elephants if I want.So for me the most versatile caliber is .357 !!!! ...just kidding, but you see that an argument can be made for anything.But we gotta stay objective and look for what's really in the middle ground and fit the specs :........ ability to adapt or be adapted to many different functions or activities.
I don't care much for these kind of topics as they are controversial and stir the pot with peoples beliefs or feelings...the answer is so subjective. If you were to attempt to objectively answer this, you'd maybe say the most versatile should be whatever is middle ground, which allows the largest swing in energy variance to cover nearby calibers. If you were to answer this through the lens of which caliber is most practical in terms of cost and potential energy range it covers, then that answer shifts. If you were to answer this through the filter that omits cost/efficiency, you'll get another answer. If you have a minimum energy requirement that must be met to fit within this 'versatile' definition, well then that completely disqualifies many smaller calibers...you see where I am going? That said the obvious answer is .25 or .30 cal (joking)
Quote from: Luis Leon on July 09, 2020, 06:19:26 PMQuote from: Nomadic Pirate on July 09, 2020, 02:25:28 PMQuote from: Luis Leon on July 09, 2020, 02:10:42 PMThis thread is/was about the versatility of a caliber... not having one gun, or casting, smelting, melting, etc. Hands down it has to be the .22, no matter how much the .30 or .45 or even .50 are talked up... they definitely are not as versatile in a practical sense.Absolutely, .45 and .50 aren't versatile, like .177 and .22 limited to one side of the spectrum..30 isn't versatile in a practical sense ?In the sense that after I get home from work. And get to plinking and target shooting I’m not going to do it with a .30. I could just break out some CCI CBs if I wanted to shoot chunks of lead real slow. And after plinking and target shooting, I can go pesting or hunting with the same load out. No adjustments necessary...Also your CCI CB at 700 fps is vastly more dangerous then a soft Predator hollowpoint at 40 FPE,...and since they are very inaccurate too ....... and you can go hunt after pesting quite effectively without adjustments, and probably be more effective too
I would venture that you could cover the widest range of targets (plinking to big game) with a .25/.257 cal, shooting pellets down to 20 gr. at 500 fps (11 FPE) up to 112 gr. at 1000+ fps (250 FPE).... It may not be practical to dial one gun over that entire range, however.... but the question was which CALIBER?....Bob
Quote from: rsterne on July 09, 2020, 06:58:56 PMI would venture that you could cover the widest range of targets (plinking to big game) with a .25/.257 cal, shooting pellets down to 20 gr. at 500 fps (11 FPE) up to 112 gr. at 1000+ fps (250 FPE).... It may not be practical to dial one gun over that entire range, however.... but the question was which CALIBER?....BobYep, .257 with 1 in 7" twist would be able to cover the largest range. As you mentioned perhaps not the most practical..... e.g. 1 in 7" would probably limit diabolo pellets to low speed but that would be fine.P.S. I noticed Air Venturi advertised .25 for the Air bolt (Arrow) at one time:https://www.airventuri.com/airboltI wonder why that never happened? It would have expanded .25 to include the largest game! (Laws permitting. Not all states allow air bow hunting.)EDIT: Maybe if .25 doesn't work......30 cal Air venturi air bolt would?
Quote from: UnderPressure on July 09, 2020, 07:37:32 PMQuote from: rsterne on July 09, 2020, 06:58:56 PMI would venture that you could cover the widest range of targets (plinking to big game) with a .25/.257 cal, shooting pellets down to 20 gr. at 500 fps (11 FPE) up to 112 gr. at 1000+ fps (250 FPE).... It may not be practical to dial one gun over that entire range, however.... but the question was which CALIBER?....BobYep, .257 with 1 in 7" twist would be able to cover the largest range. As you mentioned perhaps not the most practical..... e.g. 1 in 7" would probably limit diabolo pellets to low speed but that would be fine.P.S. I noticed Air Venturi advertised .25 for the Air bolt (Arrow) at one time:https://www.airventuri.com/airboltI wonder why that never happened? It would have expanded .25 to include the largest game! (Laws permitting. Not all states allow air bow hunting.)EDIT: Maybe if .25 doesn't work......30 cal Air venturi air bolt would?Yeah I was super excited by the .25 AirBolts ( that would definitely make it the most versatile caliber by miles ) but they never came, I'm guessing the shaft had to be to skinny and couldn't handle the power.
Using a heavy point will also make the arrow more forgiving. An arrow with a higher FOC will move the fulcrum point farther forward on the arrow, giving the fletching more leverage. This improved leverage allows you to use smaller vanes to maintain the same steering power. Using smaller vanes is a good thing, because many of the good aspects of hunting arrow performance are inversely proportional to the total surface area of the arrow. In other words, the less surface area, the better the arrow will function.
It's important to use a relatively stiff shaft when using a lot of weight in the front end of the arrow. The dynamic spine (stiffness) of the arrow decreases as weight is added to the front of the arrow. The dynamic spine is a measure of how stiff the arrow acts as it is being accelerated by the bowstring. The more weight on the front end of the arrow, the weaker the shaft will act. The static spine is a measure of the shaft's stiffness at rest. The static spine will remain the same no matter how much weight is added to the front of the arrow.
I think that probably .30 is to small for arrows, but if they ever come out with them I'm in
HAve you really tried to get round lead ball to shoot worth a "carp"....may be "perectly round"but that doesn't man they are all the same diameter.Never really came close in accuracy with .177's, 22's,or 25's....a few were good enough to be useful...often shooting better than the worst pellet-pellets test, but not really to the potential.Did find the bigger the bore, the better round ball shot (as a percentage of the best pellet=pellets)….so basically followed caliber(with bigger bores doing better with lead ball than little bores...but both not nearly as good a pellet-pellets).But go ahead...give it a try...might bet lucky....whichever, post whatever you find.
Maybe the .25 Air Bolt could work if the shaft were shortened? (re: shorter arrows can use weaker spine shafts all other things being equal.)
Quote from: UnderPressure on July 09, 2020, 11:27:41 PMMaybe the .25 Air Bolt could work if the shaft were shortened? (re: shorter arrows can use weaker spine shafts all other things being equal.)For Airbolts to work they need to be as close as possible to the valve,...to much empty space between the valve and nock and they are rendered useless