I liked this discussion because it was taken with a very civil tone and attitude, it is a credit to the forum and to all the users here, thanks! Great discussion!As an industry insider, let me add one more thing:ALL "makers of stuff" (springs and seals among them), are dependent on the quality of the material they get delivered.NONE of the small makers can afford a metallurgical/chemistry lab in house to determine if the material is the right one, or even the advertised/purchased one.All of us "makers of stuff" rely on the past experience with a supplier, and we cannot do much if someone in that supply chain bungles anything (on purpose or not, is irrelevant, we cannot afford a lawyer to get the loss of goodwill back).Whether it is seals, or springs, or even materials like Aluminum, Steel (in different grades), or plastic (delrin/nylon/teflon, etc), or wood. WE depend on those that sell to us the components, or the materials.ANYONE from among our suppliers can have a problem, but if that someone is not fully candid and forthcoming, we have no way to transmit that information and "recall" those products we know will not be "up to snuff" at the customer's range or hunting grounds.We cannot know what we do not know. And that would be a reason to deal with a "Professional". A Pro will stand behind his products and services.Yes, sometimes it feels unfair that we have to deal with the problem, but that is life. Sometimes you're on top, sometimes you're not.The only way to turn a bad experience into a positive one is by sharing what we learned.Thanks for sharing!HM
You know Jose, I'm really sorry things didn't work out for you on your tune ... I would be peeved about the $300 too . That said, there's no one on this forum who's care and workmanship I would In-Trust more than Motorhead. Hector Medina and Bob Stern are there too. Best Regards,Kirk
Quote from: SpiralGroove on October 09, 2019, 01:44:16 PMYou know Jose, I'm really sorry things didn't work out for you on your tune ... I would be peeved about the $300 too . That said, there's no one on this forum who's care and workmanship I would In-Trust more than Motorhead. Hector Medina and Bob Stern are there too. Best Regards,I'm sorry Kirk. I strongly disagree. The facts speak volumes. The tuner was given exact goals and promised the results the customer was looking for. When things "didn't work out", the tuner was given the opportunity to get it working right a second time. Then sent back sub par results a second time. When a guy with only months into the hobby puts a pre-packaged kit into not only that particular rifle but a very similar hw77 with far better results (And documented at that) some sort of reparations need to be made. Listen I don't care how highly regarded someone might be they have to stand by their work and promises. When things "didn't work out" as contracted to do, the contractor has to make things right. As of now I haven't seen or heard of that.
You know Jose, I'm really sorry things didn't work out for you on your tune ... I would be peeved about the $300 too . That said, there's no one on this forum who's care and workmanship I would In-Trust more than Motorhead. Hector Medina and Bob Stern are there too. Best Regards,
Quote from: Bayman on October 09, 2019, 06:06:50 PMQuote from: SpiralGroove on October 09, 2019, 01:44:16 PMYou know Jose, I'm really sorry things didn't work out for you on your tune ... I would be peeved about the $300 too . That said, there's no one on this forum who's care and workmanship I would In-Trust more than Motorhead. Hector Medina and Bob Stern are there too. Best Regards,I'm sorry Kirk. I strongly disagree. The facts speak volumes. The tuner was given exact goals and promised the results the customer was looking for. When things "didn't work out", the tuner was given the opportunity to get it working right a second time. Then sent back sub par results a second time. When a guy with only months into the hobby puts a pre-packaged kit into not only that particular rifle but a very similar hw77 with far better results (And documented at that) some sort of reparations need to be made. Listen I don't care how highly regarded someone might be they have to stand by their work and promises. When things "didn't work out" as contracted to do, the contractor has to make things right. As of now I haven't seen or heard of that.I have done business with Scott aka Motörhead before and will certainly do again. Once he shipped me a tuned HW35e only to find out out FedEx had broken it in half. Scott contacted me, took the reins ,and filed the claim and did get me a new stock from Germany. This was a lot of time and work for him with out payment. Never heard anything from him except “ don’t worry I will make it happen”.One “ah shoot, shouldn’t over rule 100 “atta boys”.Mitch
I also agree everyone has been civil and professional in this discussion and that's part of what makes this a great forum. I don't know what kind of contract you both engaged in, but hopefully, you guys can work something out to give you both closure.
Last but not least, if it is in your natural capabilities to do certain work to your rifles yourself, then do it! Happy Shooting!
The ARH Sgs seals wear like iron and I suspect they will last years if not decades in a rifle. But by nature they parachute during the cycle and can be slower shooting. But if have any tube issues, without honing, they will seal about the best. Cup face seals I have found get you the numbers, but only if your tube is true. The SGS seals are tricky to size for me, leaving the leading edge a few thousands larger than the rear wiper. I tuned my first HW 95 in .22cal with a Hornet kit and the SGS seal. I thought I finally outdone myself. No recoil, stacking pellets, just to find it was shooting 570 fps........lol. The spread was single digits. Took it back down, installed the Vortek seal, and a solid 720 fps rock and roller, seal unsized. I think the Vortek seals are the easiest to use, because they are so squishy. But I have found them large and small, and some so tight on the buttons they won't work. Jury is out on the longevity, but I have yet to take one down because of an issue.The best fitting seal I have found for the 97k was the moly seal cup face from Custom Air seals. They fit real well in the comp tubes and the button in the piston.Here is a pic of the SGS seal, and Vortek moly seal in the back (black in color),30mm bullet seal from ARH much like the hornet,One 97 I tuned, was eating breech seals, and have since polished the breech face on the barrel as many others do removing the lathe marks. This really helps with longevity of the breech seal. Keeping an assortment of seals give you many options for sizing. Blue ones below are from Australia, greens are ARH, and the red ones come from the UK and I believe they use to be called tough core, but I yet to replace as are showing no wear.http://www.airgunspares.com/store/product/10534/WEIHRAUCH-HW77-%26-HW97-JKI-Breech-Seal-Part-No.-9071JKI/Jason G
Quote from: abqjoe on October 09, 2019, 08:16:12 PMLast but not least, if it is in your natural capabilities to do certain work to your rifles yourself, then do it! Happy Shooting! Jose, if you have as many guns as I do, it's a necessity ... and 1/2 the fun .
My experience with the SHO kit in a97....I think the Vortek Kits are prone to mislabeling. I got a couple from PA, and they were SHO kits, as labeled by the PA sticker, but the tiny instructions had 12 marked rather than SHO. Happened with a d34 also. Never noticed till I chronied it. So check the insert before install to verify the kit.