I have the AT44 PA and the Tactical pistol in .177, the AT44 does well with the 13.xx gr JSB monsters, and the 15 gr NSA slugs. The pistol joes good with the 105 gr CPD and the 13.xx monsters though at a little less FPS.
That will make a great gun for small game hunting! Nowadays, we have access to pellets up to 16 grains, and slugs up to 21 grains in .177. The AT44 isn't short on power, so it can handle most any of the options out there. It can also be modded(with very little cost) to make all the power you could possibly want in .177. I have a .22 capable of 70fpe and I have a .177 capable of 45fpe. I shoot the .177 the most for critters, and it is tuned to around 18fpe(which the AT44 can do easily). .177 is a great pesting caliber, with high shot count and low noise
Quote from: Back_Roads on June 13, 2019, 09:54:50 AM I have the AT44 PA and the Tactical pistol in .177, the AT44 does well with the 13.xx gr JSB monsters, and the 15 gr NSA slugs. The pistol joes good with the 105 gr CPD and the 13.xx monsters though at a little less FPS. Thanks you, what kind of groups are you getting with the at44?
I saw they still have one for sale, but only in .177 think it would be good for small game hunting? Looks really fast, think it could push slugs, and if so would they be any good on game?
Quote from: SwampHunter on June 13, 2019, 11:52:01 AMQuote from: Back_Roads on June 13, 2019, 09:54:50 AM I have the AT44 PA and the Tactical pistol in .177, the AT44 does well with the 13.xx gr JSB monsters, and the 15 gr NSA slugs. The pistol joes good with the 105 gr CPD and the 13.xx monsters though at a little less FPS. Thanks you, what kind of groups are you getting with the at44? Well I did shoot it at 200 yards by mistake thinking I was @ the 100 yd berm, and I found my group 18 " below my shoot n see, in the webbing of the plastic snow fence, if i squared off the missing holes where there was no fence, I would say 4 " @ 200yds.
PAst experince with regulated PCP's would see something like twice the shots, but also something like twice the air use...so it's pretty much a Vegas "push bet".
OK...really don't want to convert this to a regulated vs.non-regulated discussion. I like regulated rifles, and find thy do their best in comparsion to tuned non-regulated rifles when you do not try to push them to the same power levels you can get from non regulated rifles.Vast majority of my posts have been in support of less power/more uniformity...which is what regulation is made to do.With an eye to my past post's shot count. Can get 35 really good non-regulated shots (hanging around3%)for about 600psi of air use. Happens around 2800-2200psi, which is only 500psi out of the 180cc's of volume.Regulate it to run from 3000-1800 (about a 125BAr regulator output),which would use 1200psi of a 180cc volume.....I'd have to expect 2X the number of good shots (70) at the same energy level to be even in air use. (the "push bet" is a kind of an old term for even).The AT44 is pretty easy to regulate. With interchangeable air tubes that also have the whole valve assembly, coiuld easily make one a regulated tube and leave the other tube non-regulated.Regaurdless of caliber wouldexpect to be able to get a short run of nice hihger power shots from the non-regulated tube over a short pressure range (pretty much what I'd want for hunting).....and a really long string of lower power regulated shots over a wide pressure range (pretty much what I'd want for playing).Do find it esp. attractive in .177....which is my choice in playing around calibers, and where lower energy/long shot counts are a big plus.
Dropped a digit on the non-reg numbers...should be 600 rather than 500.But the idea here is that it's all about energy in vs. energy out. Regulation uses a wider range of pressure for more shots than non-regulated's narrow range of pressure.