I’m hoping the hunchback has eliminated most of the flex, but it’s not ideal. Since it’s printed vertically, there isn’t near as much strength in the span as there would be printing it horizontally. No real good way to go about it if I keep the hunch other than making it a tongue and groove fit. Print the hunch as a second piece, but print it horizontally so it has more strength. It would have to either be filament welded or CA glued, or both.I’m also not even sure how how the scope is actually going to sit, or have to sit to clear the hunch at this point. It could all be a wash other than the practice in CAD.Dowels for stiffening are a good idea. 1/8” sounds a little small and flexy. There’s a decent amount of material left in the breech on either side of the centerline to go bigger I think. I was thinking at least 3/16 to 1/4” round.I’m not sure I’m going to actually worry about stiffening anything up anymore if it works as is. I do plan on chamfering all the edges and streamlining some of the blockiness if possible.
Woke up this morning to a finished hunchback of Notre Dame print. Looks like the very bottom had some cooked filament from a roll change yesterday, but otherwise, it turned out as expected. No chamfering on the drawing yet as it’s a pain to go back and edit any dimensions without having to delete all the previous chamfering anyways.I had to put my own supports in the mag well instead of auto generating. It looks rough, but it’s really not bad. I see where I forgot to add two supports as well. It should all clean up with a small file anyways.This one is much stronger, and much uglier. It will work, but jeez does it hurt to look at.I made it so the barrel will need to have the loading sled turned off, and then and extra 2mm. Instead of doing an internal o-ring, I’ll just do one on the end of the barrel similar to the Diana Chaser.I apologize for the bad photos. I was in a rush to get out the door and on my way to work.
How has the breech printing gone? Any improvements? I am very interested?