TO INCREASE FRICTION FACTOR [b]TO DECREASE FRICTION[/b] Increase Unit Load (squeeze) Decrease Increase RMS Surface Finish (metal) Decrease RMSIncrease Durometer DecreaseDecrease Speed of Motion IncreaseIncrease Cross Section of O-Ring DecreaseIncrease Pressure DecreaseOmit Lubrication UseDecrease Temperature IncreaseDecrease Groove Width IncreaseIncrease Diameter of Bore or Rod DecreaseDecrease Surface Finish (O-Ring) IncreaseStretch O-ring Joule Effect* Compress O-RingLower Durometer of O-Ring Coefficient of Friction# Increase Durometer
Very interesting Jason. We are dealing with 1mm O-rings now so not much to work with on surface tension to begin with. I'm still in favor of the correct lube and a hard hammer strike.
Keith Im sending you the heavier(40G) Buffer Hammer it will almost eliminate the Stiction.
I'll throw this out there. I have been working on some really neat thin film coatings. This morning I coated some of my concept valve parts. The coating trial was to see if I could coat the ID of a part. It works The idea would be to have a smoother surface and lower COF between brass to o ring.These pic's of the parts are under high magnification. The ID of the sleeve id .25" and on the piston is .08". What a beautiful coating.and another good article on dynamic o orings situations.https://www.physics.harvard.edu/uploads/files/machineshop/epm_oring_handbook.pdf
So my mds hammer with peek striker that I can run recessed weighs about 35 grams and hit it hard and fast . Should I polish the thimble up too
When it comes to breaking "Surface Tension" a microscopically rough surface such a crosshatch has less drag than a polished one.
Is it going to be a retro fit to the old valve or completely new