... living in their parents basement because they cannot get a job
Guys lets focus on the YouTube channels that were shut down and are being restored rather that speculation. As facts as to the source of the problem please present them as verified facts not speculation and above please keep politics out of the thread when posting new information.
Quote from: Sfttailrdr46 on February 26, 2018, 11:11:47 PMGuys lets focus on the YouTube channels that were shut down and are being restored rather that speculation. As facts as to the source of the problem please present them as verified facts not speculation and above please keep politics out of the thread when posting new information.Theres only one problem in that statement. Yes some channels have been restored but more are being terminated at the same time. Racknload was up and running this whole time until the last few hours. racknload was terminated after the big channels had been restored. This isnt over yet.
Yep, this is definitely not over yet.
Quote from: WesBob on February 27, 2018, 01:46:24 AMYep, this is definitely not over yet.Not until they stop whoever is flagging the videos or fix the reporting system.
Quote from: MartyMcFly on February 26, 2018, 09:48:36 PMIf these are malicious and organized takedowns by social justice warriors and not Google's own agenda, then it might be considered tortious interference. These individuals or groups are after all destroying the livelihoods of the content creators by interfering in the business relationship between Google and the creators. I'm not a lawyer, but perhaps the content creators have good cause to impel google to identify the users that are flagging the videos in order to bring legal action against them. People who are the victims of defamation can ask to have anonymous internet users identified to file a lawsuit and perhaps a similar argument can be used in this situation.This form of action may not only scare the social justice warriors, but it can force Google to fix their system, after all they don't want to be in the middle of such lawsuits. Lastly, this may bring about other scary scenarios into focus for Google, such as class action lawsuits. If the content providers can prove that at the time of termination they were not in breach of their contracts, they may have grounds for legal action. Despite vague contracts that are usually written to protect the service providers each state has its own laws that can provide additional protections despite what Google may have laid out in their agreements with user and creators.I want to stress that I am not a lawyer, but these are ideas I would explore if my livelihood was impacted and I would go to great lengths to organize with other content providers to spread the costs of the legal action and to put more weight behind the issue.The San Bernardino terrorist had iPhones and obviously the FBI and Homeland Security wanted to know the content of this device to prevent further attacks and find co-conspirators. Liberal, American hating, Silicon Valley Apple refused to cooperate. The DOJ was preparing a suit, and that is when the FBI hired some top hackers to break into the iPhones of these terrorist to complete their investigations and do their jobs.Do you think for one minute that Google/YouTube is going to cough up the name of some social justice warrior, living in their parents basement because they cannot get a job, to some local lawyer so that content creators can sue for damages???Never happen. Not in a million years. I applaud your theory and the idea behind this, but Silicon Valley and our tech overlords are more powerful than the federal government. They know more about you and I than the feds ever will. All that, and lets be honest, Google/YouTube is happy to eliminate people who do not accept their ideology. They will be happy to remove First Amendment, Second Amendment, and Third Amendment supporters, and go with, "Gee, must be a glitch in our algorithm on how we find inappropriate content. So sorry.."I love you...Check's in the mail......well, you know the rest. Get off YouTube. Go direct to content creators websites. Financially support them. F YT.
If these are malicious and organized takedowns by social justice warriors and not Google's own agenda, then it might be considered tortious interference. These individuals or groups are after all destroying the livelihoods of the content creators by interfering in the business relationship between Google and the creators. I'm not a lawyer, but perhaps the content creators have good cause to impel google to identify the users that are flagging the videos in order to bring legal action against them. People who are the victims of defamation can ask to have anonymous internet users identified to file a lawsuit and perhaps a similar argument can be used in this situation.This form of action may not only scare the social justice warriors, but it can force Google to fix their system, after all they don't want to be in the middle of such lawsuits. Lastly, this may bring about other scary scenarios into focus for Google, such as class action lawsuits. If the content providers can prove that at the time of termination they were not in breach of their contracts, they may have grounds for legal action. Despite vague contracts that are usually written to protect the service providers each state has its own laws that can provide additional protections despite what Google may have laid out in their agreements with user and creators.I want to stress that I am not a lawyer, but these are ideas I would explore if my livelihood was impacted and I would go to great lengths to organize with other content providers to spread the costs of the legal action and to put more weight behind the issue.
Regarding comments about the big fish not caring about the little guy. What are the big players going to be able to really do when they are also subjected to the same arbitrary restrictions? Sites are being taken down, reinstated and then targeted again. I do believe that supporting the bigger name content providers is the only way to help those with a smaller audience. If nothing else the bigger players are looking at options for posting content and that will benefit all content producers.
The above responses to my last post proves that there can be posting about the attacks on our hobby and the contributors that post their videos on YouTube with focus on the problem and no political statements. We as a large community need to unite across the entire spectrum of air gun posters and bloggers and need to work on the solution as an organized entity. I know for a fact that there is more than sufficient talent and tech savvy to ferret out the true culprits and shine a bright light on who they are and exactly what they are doing.
Unfortunately the way things work, The media, and as a result, the country as a whole needs something to blame... because, also unfortunately, admitting the truth that parenting, education and instilling manners and morality in the younger generations has been going downhill for quite some time... is just too real and harsh of a reality. We all need something/someone to demonize when the truth is too painful and complicated to come to terms with.I love this sport/hobby and will remain hopeful regardless... but I’m still admittedly scared.