Quote from: StevenG on February 25, 2018, 12:21:24 PMNo, the aim is to not irritate companies that buy ads. They want to create the next cable tv, companies don't want to risk having their advertising on controversial content.Okay, fair enough. It's not about punishing content creators, it's about appeasing advertisers. So does this mean the demonetization didn't take it far enough, and now the mere presence of videos about airguns is deemed so offensive to advertisers that Youtube has decided it must be completely removed from their site? I can't imagine that's the case unless Robert Kyncl is a liar, liar, pants on fire. I was thinking more likely this is a coordinated effort by activists to flag content for takedown and Youtube is behind the 8 ball because of the sheer volume.
No, the aim is to not irritate companies that buy ads. They want to create the next cable tv, companies don't want to risk having their advertising on controversial content.
Quote from: StevenG on February 25, 2018, 12:18:44 PMQuote from: 45flint on February 25, 2018, 11:07:28 AMThe power of so few people high in the tech world is pretty scary, but that is the reality given the cost of entry is now so incredibly high. How do you fight Google? Realistically there is no way? There really is no alternative, free markets can be closed out by incredibly high costs of entry.The cost to start is very low, that is how Google started.With new concepts the cost of entry can be low, but the ramps up quickly as players succeed and get larger. Now in tech this happens incredibly quickly. You are not proposing a new product you are proposing competing with Google, to really do that would take a lot of investment. Sure you can easily start a video company no one will visit or see?
Quote from: 45flint on February 25, 2018, 11:07:28 AMThe power of so few people high in the tech world is pretty scary, but that is the reality given the cost of entry is now so incredibly high. How do you fight Google? Realistically there is no way? There really is no alternative, free markets can be closed out by incredibly high costs of entry.The cost to start is very low, that is how Google started.
The power of so few people high in the tech world is pretty scary, but that is the reality given the cost of entry is now so incredibly high. How do you fight Google? Realistically there is no way? There really is no alternative, free markets can be closed out by incredibly high costs of entry.
I'd say the timing is a bit suspect.
I think this is probably more to do with an organized push by anti-hunters than it is gun grabbers after the recent shooting.Youtube started throttling the traffic on my channel a month ago that was coming from my airgun hunting videos. I get death threats from antis with some regularity thru my channel. I think they find airgun hunting especially offensive because our videos are usually scope cam or highly zoomed in and show impacts and aftermaths in slow motion. Even though videos and channels are being flagged and banned that don't show actual airgun hunting, most people who are into airguns are into them for hunting, or so the perception is. I think they perceive us as weaker than the NRA protected firearm community and therefore an easier target.
This fellow claims Google+ was the issue for the banning.
Here's Steve from airgun exploration. Makes sense his thinking on what is happening. Real shame. Hopefully YouTube is not behind it as well and things can eventually be sorted out. Unfortunately those that lost their videos may never have them restored? I wonder if YouTube can even restore deleted videos if they want to?Here's Steve:
Tony, why do you think YouTube started this? I'd be interested to hear your thoughts.