Yes it would. Type III with a teflon seal (common practice for high wear parts) would be ideal for this application. Steel hammer (subject to side-loading during cocking) under a spring in an aluminum tube needs a little something to help prevent undue wear.
Quote from: Vee3 on February 01, 2018, 12:39:40 AMYes it would. Type III with a teflon seal (common practice for high wear parts) would be ideal for this application. Steel hammer (subject to side-loading during cocking) under a spring in an aluminum tube needs a little something to help prevent undue wear.That's why it's stated to NOT use the metal hammers with these tubes. The MDS work great and honestly there much better than the metal hammers
Hi Keith,Yes, I think that cannon should be called "The Awkward 51." Definitely heavy and awkward. After I got it back home, I sorted out the mechanics of it and got it shooting pretty well. Its in pieces now on my workbench, ready to be transformed into "The Ergonomic 51", LOL.Here are a few pics: The Awkward 51, its balanced valve (which cocks very easy), a 5 shot 100 yd group with 250 gn .51 bullets. There are 3 shots in the hole at 11 o'clock.
PS, did the Stagamites work?....