I have to agree with most of what you are saying. But for the younger or any member I wouldn't think using drugs as a cheaper hobby.
Is the TX200MK3 or HW97K worth 2X as much s D34?
The real question is what is the real question
I got to thinking about some threads around here. Is the TX200MK3 or HW97K worth 2X as much s D34? I guess it comes down to who you ask. I have shot both and I found the D34 can be just as accurate as either. The stock and comfort does beat the 34, but then again why do you shoot? I shoot to hit a target, but I do enjoy the comfort and beauty a rifle has to offer. Is a Hatsan Galatian worth 1.5X than the price of a MROD?
Most people ask what is your intended use, but it should also go on to say what do you want? Do you want something that is accurate for your intended purpose, or do you want something that every time you see her you want to caress her. You should also consider if they are new to the hobby, because it just is not for everyone.
I have both Tx200 22cal PG2 tuned and {2} D34s, the 177 has a PG2 soft tune , the 22cal has a PG2HO kit. Both my 34s will shoot every bit as good as my TX. My TX does have a better trigger, and the walnut is soooo nice. I think my 34s are easier to shoot, not as hold sensitive. JMO. Also my 34s don't seem to be as pellet picky. I just ordered more ammo to test in my TX, it has never shot as good as my 34s at 45+yds. I do like showing people the TX and having them look at me like, are you nuts? you spent that on an AG?
I don't know if it's fair to put the question as simply as is one rifle worth two times that of another. Sometimes to get an small improvement in accuracy, for example, the cost rises in a ratio that does not equal the "rise" in accuracy. What I mean is that to get a, say, 10% improvement in accuracy, it might be necessary to spend considerably more than 10% more on the rifle. BR .22LR shooters may have to spend a thousand and more to achieve a seemingly modest improvement in accuracy because that's what it costs to get to the next level.I think it was on GTA that I read an analogy about what it costs to improve a racing bicycle, to make it "better" and lighter. For every incremental improvement in the bike, the increase in price was not linear; it is almost exponential. In short, it's necessary to spend a lot more to get noticeable improvements over something that is already pretty good.In that sense, perhaps the TX or the HW is twice the cost of a D34 because it their improvements are not obtained inexpensively. A better barrel is more expensive as is a superior stock, among other things. Additionally, it should be kept in mind that the TX200 and the HW 97, 98, and 77 are all among the best spring piston air rifles that can be bought today by anyone who has the money. No special ordering, no special waiting list. Shooters, like many people who are serious about their hobbies, are often willing to pay top dollar for the "best there is". As a result there is always a demand for the best and this allows prices to reflect demand. To get a springer that is significantly better, customization is necessary and even more costly.The above is in no way to cast aspersions on the D34, which is a very good rifle for the money.