I know now what to do, and it will be a little different from this first one but not much.All I'm doing is cutting off .550 from the back, a groove on the tube, a conical spring and a grind down on the back of the poppet to about .225. The poppet moves nice and smooth ;- ) I'm hoping for an increase of 30-40 fps with this valve mod, hope I get more.wll
Quote from: wll on February 17, 2016, 04:59:42 PMI know now what to do, and it will be a little different from this first one but not much.All I'm doing is cutting off .550 from the back, a groove on the tube, a conical spring and a grind down on the back of the poppet to about .225. The poppet moves nice and smooth ;- ) I'm hoping for an increase of 30-40 fps with this valve mod, hope I get more.wllNo, what I meant is the grove I put in the next valve will be not as wide as this one, being the the back end is opened up and the conical spring leaves wide open air flow as there is no washer or ? to block the air.wll
No, what I meant is the grove I put in the next valve will be not as wide as this one, being the the back end is opened up and the conical spring leaves wide open air flow as there is no washer or ? to block the air.wll
On the next one remove most of the aluminum...only need a ring to help hold the o-ring in place. Don't need a valve spring either...add an e clip or o-ring in a groove on the valve stem to keep it from falling completely out. Valve spring contributes very little force compared to that derived from the pressure.Al
The spring vs. no spring thing is what we were talking about in the current "Velocity vs barrel length in QB" thread http://www.gatewaytoairguns.org/GTA/index.php?topic=104460.0As mentioned there, it's a dicey proposition to run no spring if you are a pump filler since you may not be able to build pressure fast enough to get the poppet to seal. Also, if it were an unregulated rifle, having no spring tends to yield a narrower useful bell curve because the restorative force to close the valve is directly proportional to the pressure in the tube so it doesn't self regulate the lift vs dwell as well. Just something to keep in mind.
Gippeto can tell us how far the c clip or o ring groove needs to be back from valve block on poppet stem hopefully.
... force to close the valve is directly proportional to the pressure in the tube...
Quote from: buldawg76 on February 17, 2016, 08:51:39 PMGippeto can tell us how far the c clip or o ring groove needs to be back from valve block on poppet stem hopefully.Stock Qb is setup where the striker will hit the valve retention block when valve stem has moved ~ 1/8"...keep a bit more than that much travel. Could simply epoxy a piece of brass tubing onto the stem once installed in the valve body...easier than making a groove and doesn't weaken the stem. A bit of heat will loosen the epoxy should removal be necessary...at which point the valve stem is likely toast anyways.As I said...valve spring contributes very little to the forces...calc them out if you like. MOST of the force is already coming from the pressure.Tune the dwell by adjusting striker mass and poppet stem diameter. Can adjust required opening force by altering sealing diameter at the "hat" part of the valve stem too. Everything has a cause and an effect...change parameters to cause expected/desired results.Admittedly a great deal easier to fine tune if one has machine tools.As far as pump guys go....delrin perimeter sealing valve stem on a flat faced valve body straight off the lathe, no lapping....seals @100psi from the shop compressor. That would be the Gen 2 valve in the first pic.Qb stem with it's soft urethane seal...should be no issue getting it to seal. JMO.Quote... force to close the valve is directly proportional to the pressure in the tube... That IS self regulation. Al
That IS self regulation.
Assuming when you reversed the spring & used e-clip, it necessitated drilling the "pre-valve, steel piece" that partially covers the stem (to accommodate the larger clip/spring)? Hole between 1/8" and 1/4"