MROD has new look ...

[oakey]

Mike I like Evanix and FX let me know your thoughts when you go and please post what you shoot.

Thanks
Oaks

[GadgetX]

I still would like to get a tactical synthetic for her...

Mike

[trinket]

I still would like to get a tactical synthetic for her...

Mike

NOW were talkin !!

[Bruce]

Nice job I really like the laminated stock!

Bruce

[jward681]

Drooling over that beauty. Makes me want the mrod even more than I already did.....

John

[Finchlake]

Man those pics have me just about ready to pull the trigger on a blaster stock just like yours. I now have to two MRODS a .22 and a .25. All the more reason to get me one of them stocks on one of them.

[GadgetX]

All I can say is I did not like the butt heavy MROD stock at all.  Learned to love it because it was so easy to shoot, easy to work on and wickedly accurate.  After putting the new stock on it was SSSooo  much nicer.  Much more balanced and I love the thumbhole stock feel.  I ordered a hawke sunshield a while back when I ordered the stock.  It is do in today, that will complete the look I wanted for the AG.  I will post a photo. 

I talked to Crosman yesterday and was informed that the new syn MROD definitely had changed trigger and gauge locations.  I asked about performance and they said they could not say any more.  Probably going for one, the bad news is I don't know how long I will have to wait for someone to inlet a thumbhole syn stock for it.

Mike 

[jonnnyboy]

That is a beautiful stock and gun.  Thank you for sharing.

joe

[bmazz007]

looks nice.....! Very Nice where did you get that stock??

[squirrelnator]

awsome I really like the color !

[GadgetX]

The Stock is from Norm at Disco-R-us.

Mike

[sandman1]

I have the same stock and did not notice the difference in weight but the thumbhole makes it feel like a different rifle. It feels like you have more control.
Sandman1

[trinket]

I have the same stock and did not notice the difference in weight but the thumbhole makes it feel like a different rifle. It feels like you have more control.
Sandman1
 Thats what I had figured, as far as the weight goes.

[Finchlake]

I like the way you show both stocks on  picture 2619. You can really see the difference in the two stocks. The check piece on the blaster is a lot lower on the blaster than the original stock. Do you miss the higher check piece on the blaster ?

[mtbdrew]

Beautiful setup.

[GadgetX]

No I do not miss the original at all.  The cheek rise did not work well with my scope anyway.

MIke

[Finchlake]

The cheek rise did not work well with my scope anyway.

That's great, one more plus for getting me one.

[FuzzyGrub]

I like the way you show both stocks on  picture 2619. You can really see the difference in the two stocks. The check piece on the blaster is a lot lower on the blaster than the original stock. Do you miss the higher check piece on the blaster ?

Good observation!  I missed that.  I was considering this stock or getting the blank and trying to do the cut-out work.  I liked the look of the foregrip and thumbhole.  A good cheek weld is important to me when not bench rest shooting.  The oe stock is not high enough for my scope and medium rings.  Around a 1/4" too low.  The blaster looks to be considerbly lower.  Hmm, I will have to take that into consideration for any final decission.  Thx for pointing that out.