Part of the problem, IMO, was the lack of "hard data" at the time, using how far a pellet would penetrate things, and observations about how hard it would knock things over, instead of Chrony numbers.... Plus, they wanted to be quite secretive about what they were doing to get the results they claimed, and didn't really appreciate questions about the shooting characteristics.... Now I'm not saying they didn't do what they claimed, but with no hard numbers, and no way for others to duplicate their results.... it kind of became a gong show.... It's really too bad, because some good things went down the tube, lost with all the hype....Bob
Well, Gene simply asked which rams were used and hopefully I got em right, but since once again it seems there is some misconception that this is some pioneering or innovative work that could only be found through former members, I'll throw out two links to conversions that have been around far longer than either Mike or Tarheel's efforts. There are more, but the point should be clear.
Well, Gene simply asked which rams were used and hopefully I got em right, but since once again it seems there is some misconception that this is some pioneering or innovative work that could only be found through former members, I'll throw out two links to conversions that have been around far longer than either Mike or Tarheel's efforts. There are more, but the point should be clear. airgunforum.ca/forums/topic23031.html