You guys and gals have me quite intrigued about a short stroked Sport now. I placed an order for a TbT 30mm HW short stroke kit. I figure an HW80 piston seal fits so that kit should fit easily enough as well. I think this should really transform the gun
Quote from: Sqwirl57 on January 26, 2024, 01:04:29 PMYou guys and gals have me quite intrigued about a short stroked Sport now. I placed an order for a TbT 30mm HW short stroke kit. I figure an HW80 piston seal fits so that kit should fit easily enough as well. I think this should really transform the gunI have not tinkered into this realm, but I could see where this might help the rifle. I never bit onto short stroking, due to the strange cocking motion to take up the slack as a result of the added spacing in front if the piston (not in the rear side with stem mods).Custom Air Seals was making a snap on seal for 26 & 30mm pistons. However it has the cup face style seals which I would rather use in a 97 style comp tube. The parachute may be the ticket instead in case the tube is slightly over sized or out of round. Shortening the stroke on that big heavy 30 mm piston may clean up the cycle some.The safety if I recall is reset with the rear skirt, that wouldn’t favor well I suppose with custom stem or piston work without some serious thought.Jason
Quote from: Hoosier Daddy on January 26, 2024, 05:20:40 PMMy WhiteFang HW98...I dug out my target file folder and found this "note to self".It passes the pellet on turret test.OC delivered. I recall an R10 that OC installed an HW98 barrel in also, is this the R10? IIRC, he machined an extension that snapped in the front of the piston, and added a piston seal. He also claimed it was accurate and smooth.Jason
My WhiteFang HW98...I dug out my target file folder and found this "note to self".It passes the pellet on turret test.OC delivered.
Quote from: Jason_Garvin on January 26, 2024, 06:30:26 PMQuote from: Hoosier Daddy on January 26, 2024, 05:20:40 PMMy WhiteFang HW98...I dug out my target file folder and found this "note to self".It passes the pellet on turret test.OC delivered. I recall an R10 that OC installed an HW98 barrel in also, is this the R10? IIRC, he machined an extension that snapped in the front of the piston, and added a piston seal. He also claimed it was accurate and smooth.JasonNope this is his HW98 not an R10 .. I have an R10 and wanted a matching R11... Whitefang offered this HW98 instead as a substitute .And that is how the story began.
So Hoosier,What average velocity are you achieving out the the HW98, short-stroked by Fang?
I'm with you Wes, and you said it well.My original question was to see if some people had changed their preferences with experience, as had happened to me. My first exposures to good springers were both Diana's, and I was surprised to find that with more exposure I now (mostly) prefer less powerful HWs, because I really like the harder shooting guns. Started wondering if I was following a common evolution, as it were, away from velocity. I've changed to the point that I recently bought an HW30, and I'm enjoying it. I would not have thought to do so 5 years ago.Don't get me wrong, I'm not selling off any Diana's and they get plenty of time in my shooting rotation. In fact I have a little D54 project going on now, and a D460 that will be getting some attention soon too. But I've found that the HWs suit me better. Or just please me more. Not quite sure which.
Quote from: Kragman1 on December 10, 2023, 07:23:03 PMI've been very curious about those 340's for a long time Yogi. I'd trade my 350 NTEC for one I think, to someone looking for more power.FWIW-I think the Diana 340 N-tec Compact Lexus(walnut hogsback stock), is one of the very nicest looking airguns. All the proportions are right and it just fits.Why more companies do not make hogsback stocks if beyond me. -Yogi
I've been very curious about those 340's for a long time Yogi. I'd trade my 350 NTEC for one I think, to someone looking for more power.
Hey guys I have this rifle, the 98 with the R10 tube short stroked, I do not remember what the numbers were when I got it, but it was turned down, OC, described it as a FWB300 on steroids, I planned to put a full power JM hornet kit for an R10 back in it, I bought the kit awhile back and posted a pix of it, just haven't had the time to do much of anything due to my work schedule and other projects I have going on with custom builds on some PB's, I also have 1 of his hot rodded R1's in .20cal, both of these rifles are fabulous shooters! I really miss my friend OC
Hoosier, I have enough rifles for 10 life times. But that HW85 .20 cal. makes me envious. I have the .177 and .22 which are a treat to shoot. I’m finding the .20 cal. to be favourable. Often wondered what the 85 would be like in .20 cal. Going to be a challenge to get. Thanks for showing. Crow
I have often wondered if a Magnum .20 cal would have an advantage over a .177I see the advantage for sure in .22 because you can run heavier, more aerodynamic pellets up against the 900 fps mark.And it seems like the 11+ to 15+ grain .20 pellets would work very well in the 800-900 fps range. Possibly optimizing the pellet weight & BC combo vs velocity generated by magnum springers.I have considered rebarreling my spare Parrus, but my curriousity is "little", expected cost "lots"....
Quote from: Kragman1 on January 27, 2024, 01:50:24 PMI have often wondered if a Magnum .20 cal would have an advantage over a .177I see the advantage for sure in .22 because you can run heavier, more aerodynamic pellets up against the 900 fps mark.And it seems like the 11+ to 15+ grain .20 pellets would work very well in the 800-900 fps range. Possibly optimizing the pellet weight & BC combo vs velocity generated by magnum springers.I have considered rebarreling my spare Parrus, but my curriousity is "little", expected cost "lots".... In a Springer, a .20 caliber HW80 cannot be beat for precision accuracy out to 80+ yards.I would like to see how a .20 cal. D54 or D56 would compare ............... it's likely their heavier mass/lower recoil would give them the edge.
Quote from: SpiralGroove on January 27, 2024, 03:32:58 PMQuote from: Kragman1 on January 27, 2024, 01:50:24 PMI have often wondered if a Magnum .20 cal would have an advantage over a .177I see the advantage for sure in .22 because you can run heavier, more aerodynamic pellets up against the 900 fps mark.And it seems like the 11+ to 15+ grain .20 pellets would work very well in the 800-900 fps range. Possibly optimizing the pellet weight & BC combo vs velocity generated by magnum springers.I have considered rebarreling my spare Parrus, but my curriousity is "little", expected cost "lots".... In a Springer, a .20 caliber HW80 cannot be beat for precision accuracy out to 80+ yards.I would like to see how a .20 cal. D54 or D56 would compare ............... it's likely their heavier mass/lower recoil would give them the edge.Seems almost all Field Target shooters shoot .177 cal with a 20 foot pound max limit. Personally I've never met a shooter using a .20 but I'm sure there MUST be a FEW.
Quote from: SpiralGroove on January 26, 2024, 09:07:32 PMSo Hoosier,What average velocity are you achieving out the the HW98, short-stroked by Fang?I dug through all my files and can't find where I ever Chono'ed it. Good project for today!