deadens the bark even more, although the latter is just my imagination
Quote from: Rick67 on March 10, 2021, 10:14:18 AMdeadens the bark even more, although the latter is just my imaginationI think the sleeve stops the aluminum tube from ringing, and reduces transmission of what ringing remains. So, a less metallic "ping"?
I wonder why the AUO is not a bestseller It is cheap and handsome—like sugar and spice and everything nice To reiterate, I would like to get another one, but it should be half the length for my 17xx/PROD.It should overtake the Mini Belita in practicality—price-wise
Ak, ak, Mr. C I think it needs to be the same OD to cut down on cost.All it needs is half the length so it does not require purchase of materials.I will buy 2 right away.I can even do payment right now 😁
*thumbup*
The sleeve seems to deaden the sound even more, but it could be my ears playing tricks on me, Mr. C, lol!
Quote from: Rick67 on March 24, 2021, 07:22:48 PMThe sleeve seems to deaden the sound even more, but it could be my ears playing tricks on me, Mr. C, lol!It makes sense that the outer metal tube would "ping" on the shot, as if you rapped it with the stem of a wooden spoon. It makes sense that the foam rubber sleeve would damp that sound and act as a barrier to reduce transmission to your ear. If the LCD tube were larger, the foam sleeve could live against the ID of the tube, rather than the OD. Or you could have both
Charlie,To repeat the obvious; a foam sleeve occupies volume. If the tube ID is on the small side, and the foam is closed cell, then placing it inside the tube will help by "cushioning", but hurt (probably more) by reducing air expansion volume. So, internal foam should be low density open cell, and not very thick.Something such as this, perhaps: https://www.mcmaster.com/8614K81/