Give the whole back-story,.,,,right about now would consider it "done" for what you use it for. If you really have to have 700fps from 16gr, you might ask yourself "why?". Same question about 140 shots...why more?For the first...run though some ballistic programs over the max range actually used (lets say 100 feet/33 yards for back yard playing/pesting). Given that the sight line and bore line are already out sysc. by the scope height, are always going to be in a rise/peak/fall situation. If you balance the max. rise of each velocity (614 vs 700fps) over that short range (so that the max rise at the peak and the fall at the 33 yard mark are the same distance)...pretty much come up with "ratsarse" of real difference in inches of rise and fall.(right about here I give myseklf a lecture. "Come on Mr.Dumas (misspornouced to dumbass), if you are shooting at the home range, where you know the yardage to the foot, what is the real difference in a fraction of an inch rise and fall when the range is known?)For the second...other than the rabbit hole effect...if you aren't shooting more than 140 shots per sitting, then it doesn't make any difference to the shooting session....can always refill in the "off hours".
A 50psi raise in regulator pressure is a small amount,can be achieved by shimming the spring pack in the reg with very thin shims,probably 0,15-0,25mm but every regulator is different from another.I suggest to start with very thin shims (even 0,1mm) and test speed,unless you want to build a regulator tester.If you open the regulator,be careful to not fall the belleville springs and take note of the actual arrangement of the springs refferred to each other.An 850psi regulator can use a classic spiral spring instead of bellevilles,but the concept remain the same.
Did try to get 850 HPA and tanker co2 to work out to to some compromise setting that would allow me to use both depending on the temperturewith just a change in strier spring tension (a little restgrictive for one/ a little gas hogish for the other...somthing that kind of met in the middle).Worked the hardest on a Crosman 2250 conversion...and got close enough that it (in the words of my Uncle Harry) "make no never mind".WOW..thinging back, that was one deep rabbit hole...took a whole lot of pharting around getting it to kind of meet in the middleWuld use HPA air (with the hammer spring backed out a little) during the short cold winter here (actually, about 3-4 months down here) and small paintball tanks of co2 in the warm months (with the striker spring screwed in a little).Really wasn't great at gas use for either, but it was a useful critter.But unlike you, was not trying for 16gr. at 700 fps...more like a two-gas-ballance with 13.6gr. at 580 in the little carbine to get the the short little SOB "dual gas".(NOPE...wouldn't even try that again...either co2 or air, not going to try for a true dual gas/dual use/same speed rifle again.Make it one or the other, and lit it live to it's true potential.)
SteveI am very interested in your cheek riser, as I need 3 of them for my 850's. How hard is the Kydex to work with, never used it before, any info pointers to pass along?Thanks,Don
i also made a cover for it out of kydex, snaps on pretty solid. not terrible. figured while i was at it i'd make a cheek riser. attached with velcro. seems to work ok.
made a output test, seems Roald was right on the money when he said it seemed more like 820psi , he knows his stuff.