Artemis LP400 unexpected issue

[threesuns]

What did I expect from such an inexpensive pistol?

There is not a lot of hype, or type for that matter, regarding this Single Stroke Pneumatic by Artemis.
One big plus is the all metal construction, except for the grip scales and valve body. Don’t be too quick to say it won’t hold up. My V10 has had thousands of rounds through its synthetic valve body without incident.

FPS is as advertised 275fps with lead pellets. Not impressive, but it is what it is. Note: I did lubricate the pump, breech seal and verify the valve nut was tight prior to checking velocity.

Fit and finish is on par with an airgun in this price category. So the first thing I did was clean up the notch in the rear site so I could actually see the front sight. Next up removed the barrel (2 rear philips and 1 front allen screws) for inspection. At the breech end was this massive rough cut throat. A little polishing and trimming allowed for more consistent pellet seating. The crown was decent enough but looked off center to my eye. Was this intentional? Could this be the elevation adjustment? I marked the barrel and rotated it till the elevation was satisfactory for my 30ft basement range before drifting the rear site for windage.

And here’s the issue … THIS THING WILL SHOOT! Here’s a target with 5 shots at 30ft. I did add a pair of rose wood grip scales (+ $15) but haven’t done anything else.

[Zsigmund]

What did I expect from such an inexpensive pistol?

There is not a lot of hype, or type for that matter, regarding this Single Stroke Pneumatic by Artemis.
One big plus is the all metal construction, except for the grip scales and valve body. Don’t be too quick to say it won’t hold up. My V10 has had thousands of rounds through its synthetic valve body without incident.

FPS is as advertised 275fps with lead pellets. Not impressive, but it is what it is. Note: I did lubricate the pump, breech seal and verify the valve nut was tight prior to checking velocity.

Fit and finish is on par with an airgun is this price category. So the first thing I did was clean up the notch in the rear site so I could actually see the front sight. Next up removed the barrel (2 rear philips and 1 front allen screws) for inspection. At the breech end was this massive rough cut throat. A little polishing and trimming allowed for more consistent pellet seating. The crown was decent enough but looked off center to my eye. Was this intentional? Could this be the elevation adjustment? I marked the barrel and rotated it till the elevation was satisfactory for my 30ft basement range before drifting the rear site for windage.

And here’s the issue … THIS THING WILL SHOOT! Here’s a target with 5 shots at 30ft. I did add a pair of rose wood grip scales + $15) but have done anything else.

 Very nice!

 I've been curious about these pistols for a while. Have a bunch of P17s etc., but love the 1911 looks on this one.

[threesuns]

The initial trigger take up is clunky but should smooth with use. Sear engagement is positive. The trigger is predictable, breaks cleanly and not too heavy, which aids accuracy.
Since there is no safety I wish there were enough spring to return the trigger to its initial position if not fully engaged. I know that would add more weight, so hopefully after more of a break in. Just my preference.

I have been shooting H&N match wad cutters for accuracy but did send a few alloy pellets over the chrony and saw 340-350fps.

I really have to concentrate with the supplied sites so may take advantage of integral site rail. Just have to decide red, green or blue, with a light or without, battery or rechargeable ??. Most important … $ COST $ … given how much I’ve invested. 🙃