which gun is the quitest stoeger x20s or a nitro trail with barrel shroude

[mlrs_27m]

That's what I think too. Anyways, don't NPSS' average around 750 with CPHP's? Basically the same as the Stoeger.
[/quote]

I just ran the Stoeger over the chrony last night. It was pushing the cpd 14.3 at 660fps. At first I thought it should be shooting much faster, so I did a lube tune and replaced the spring w/ a factory x20 spring. Same results. I am very dissapionted with Stoeger for giving such false claims on power, but the rifle is very accurate. I calmed down after taking a squirrel at 20yds. I will never buy another Stoeger. The almost 300fps real world fps difference is enough to turn me off to a brand. I expect about a 150fps shortfall, but 300???

[mlrs_27m]

One more thing, I was impressed with the baffles and the way Stoeger designed the suppressor. I wish more companies would do it that way rather then a shroud.

[benjaminnpaw]

i am curious which of these 2 guns would be the quitest for hunting i have herd that on the stoeger with the spring you hear the action and spring more and then i herd that the nitro trail with gas piston is very quiet also

Which customer will have the biggest chance to become louder , the stoeger buyer, or the -1 fail (big chance) trail np buyer that sees his INDOOR (about 19 degrees celsius (67 F) always) performance drop rapidly within 300 shots?
My benji even never saw (seen?) outdoor circumstances.

[Lambchops]

That's what I think too. Anyways, don't NPSS' average around 750 with CPHP's? Basically the same as the Stoeger.

I just ran the Stoeger over the chrony last night. It was pushing the cpd 14.3 at 660fps. At first I thought it should be shooting much faster, so I did a lube tune and replaced the spring w/ a factory x20 spring. Same results. I am very dissapionted with Stoeger for giving such false claims on power, but the rifle is very accurate. I calmed down after taking a squirrel at 20yds. I will never buy another Stoeger. The almost 300fps real world fps difference is enough to turn me off to a brand. I expect about a 150fps shortfall, but 300???





The advertised FPS is 800. You should have known that they hype up their numbers to increase sales. Please search " stoeger x20 s honest real world review" and leave me a comment what you think.

[mlrs_27m]

The advertised FPS is 800. You should have known that they hype up their numbers to increase sales. Please search " stoeger x20 s honest real world review" and leave me a comment what you think.
[/quote]

I cant remember the outfit I bought the rifle from, but it was when they first came out. It was advertised at 900fps with lead. I figured real world would be about 800.
 I cant complain to much. I was shooting twigs off of a tree at 30 yds. Its super accurate, and the trigger is not bad. When it comes to a .22 I prefer a little more on the power side.

[benjaminnpaw]

That's what I think too. Anyways, don't NPSS' average around 750 with CPHP's? Basically the same as the Stoeger.

I just ran the Stoeger over the chrony last night. It was pushing the cpd 14.3 at 660fps. At first I thought it should be shooting much faster, so I did a lube tune and replaced the spring w/ a factory x20 spring. Same results. I am very dissapionted with Stoeger for giving such false claims on power, but the rifle is very accurate. I calmed down after taking a squirrel at 20yds. I will never buy another Stoeger. The almost 300fps real world fps difference is enough to turn me off to a brand. I expect about a 150fps shortfall, but 300???
The advertised FPS is 800. You should have known that they hype up their numbers to increase sales. Please search " stoeger x20 s honest real world review" and leave me a comment what you think.

It is a very weird world, where lying is normal and expected and we should know how much less we gonna get.
There must be millions in this somewhere, class-act suing them lying producers.
This is not a funny commercial, this ain't a car that wil drive 22 KM's on 1000 cc petrol (Which it did on a track so proven and all)

They SHOUT it in youtube material, on webshop's, on the box.
Why not just a law that all brands state a real life high/low (light/heavy pellet) fps ?

People want to be lied to, i guess it is true...