Quote from: jlp920 on June 13, 2020, 12:06:10 PMI am still a little gun-shy from my experience with my Hatsan .25, where I had to lube and flare pellets and stay inside of 20 yards to get a group. Indeed, I’m tempted to lube and flare pellets for this gun too. Let’s talk a little about spring-piston internal ballistics. What kinds of diameters do we require for good accuracy in a springer? In a powder burner, one or two thou over groove diameter (for cast bullets) is common knowledge. I understand there’s some flaring involved, obturation, that hooks the rifling up with the pellet–so where does head size come in? The heads on the Benji 27.9s are about .249”, skirt is about .252” at its widest. I’m guessing my Hatsan was a fluke or a result of poor QC–I would like to chill out a bit but it will take some consistency from the new Remington to relax me. Also, the parties on this thread all seem to have some engineering and technical expertise, so it seems a good place to continue the conversation.-JesseEven in the powder burner world of home re-loading and casting of boolits there is much discussion of this subject of bullet sizing. While there is some common ground around the numbers you cite it is hardly universal. Pellets, little mini badminton birdies, are odd creatures and seem designed as such to self stabilize, perhaps a carry over or universal design from smooth bore days? I have inspected pellets fired into water and find that the rifling mostly engages with the rear skirt. Thus the pellets must surely wobble down the barrel, especially where as with your Hatson there is a tolerance build (or QC issue). But as well, the skirt design is somewhat self sizing as it must expand outward when it first sees the pressurized air forcing the skirt to conform to the barrel. But the head of the pellet does not. Another consideration is friction, the minimal engagement with the barrel seen by the front part of the pellet reduces the pellet to barrel friction for higher velocity than a boolit shaped projectile that would have more surface area in contact with the barrel and rifling. Does any company have a rifling similar to Marlin Micro-Groove? The rifling in all of these China built rifles looks like it belongs in a 45-70 . Are there pellet molds that can be purchased for home casting? And in differing sizing?
I am still a little gun-shy from my experience with my Hatsan .25, where I had to lube and flare pellets and stay inside of 20 yards to get a group. Indeed, I’m tempted to lube and flare pellets for this gun too. Let’s talk a little about spring-piston internal ballistics. What kinds of diameters do we require for good accuracy in a springer? In a powder burner, one or two thou over groove diameter (for cast bullets) is common knowledge. I understand there’s some flaring involved, obturation, that hooks the rifling up with the pellet–so where does head size come in? The heads on the Benji 27.9s are about .249”, skirt is about .252” at its widest. I’m guessing my Hatsan was a fluke or a result of poor QC–I would like to chill out a bit but it will take some consistency from the new Remington to relax me. Also, the parties on this thread all seem to have some engineering and technical expertise, so it seems a good place to continue the conversation.-Jesse
Back to the original topic, I had my first satisfying session with the Remington today after addressing its various tweaks. Man, it’s blasting those benjies at like 720 FPS and I was pasting a tomato paste can at 20 yard. Definitely feels like it’s running well now. Good stuff,-Jess
I did the trigger mod using a bicycle chain roller yesterday....trigger nice!Now, I need to strap on my shoulder saver and sight the beast in.............
Still breaking mine in as well.My efforts are hampered when my neighbor and his kid have to go home.......and I can not cock it by myself....
Thanks for the tutorial, James.That's pretty much how I do it.My comments were tongue-in-cheek.............
Quote from: unionrdr on June 12, 2020, 10:51:19 AMThat's an electron beam weld on the picatinny rails. I used to run an electron beam welder at Ford in Cinci on the ATX reverse gear hubs. And my 725VTR was about 200 bucks when they first came out. Hey, yes, I see that it is welded now. When I first looked at it I thought the rail was aluminum and that it was bonded. But, yes, under magnification it is easy to see that the rail is indeed welded to the spring tube.I see two 725VTR at $219 at Cabalas locally. Good thing I went to our local Gander. It was priced $199 and on sale for $153. I am not sure I want to double my investment with the camo dip. It is beautiful I agree and your rifle is extraordinary. I have Krylon/2K painted several stocks and that runs me about $50 for materials. To tell the truth, I like the VTR better than the Trail. I like thumbhole stocks but not this derivation that Crosman uses. And I like synthetic stocks over wood for field guns. I think the VTR is the better rifle.I may have to do that sling mount. I consider this rifle a hunter, not a plinker or target shooter. I could do a AR type side sling with twist in locks or a conventional sling just looped on the barrel or do it right like you did with the sling mount on the stud. You do good work!James
That's an electron beam weld on the picatinny rails. I used to run an electron beam welder at Ford in Cinci on the ATX reverse gear hubs. And my 725VTR was about 200 bucks when they first came out.