tom/bb's 880 review?

[tweedking]

so at pyramid air there are a few 880 revues:

880-#1 a review of features..... https://www.pyramydair.com/blog/2014/03/daisy-880-part-1/

880-#2 velocity of old gun..... https://www.pyramydair.com/blog/2014/03/daisy-880-part-2/#comments

and then (odds-n-ends) monday: https://www.pyramydair.com/blog/2014/03/odds-n-ends/

he got the short end of the stick,or deserved it, with #2... he doesn't deserve it as a human....

i guess what burns me, is that, when there are equal items, teem loyalties trump all.... but what do i know, i had an AIR-177..., but wanted a 880....

if you admire the guy or just respect his opinion, let him know, today, that we say thanks, a lot. keep typing tom/bb....please share forever!

mostly my comment is to show love for the expert reviewer..... (thanks edith , keep him in line...)
second: you should post if you ever read the review there. (good luck bb)

rob the tweedking

[tweedking]

https://www.pyramydair.com/blog/

not enough of us say thanks. we have all the criticism when we disagree, but silent when we agree.

let tom know we didn't mean it, i mean we still have an opinion, but we like the blog a lot.

let tom and edith know, we all wish them happy tuesday! and never stop as long as you can....today is the day that the GTA says hi!

thanks,

[tweedking]

go now, say thanks for the review, and make bb not want to quit.....

[wilsonj1018]

tried twice, but their pos server is having issues.......

[wimpanzee]

tried twice, but their pos server is having issues.......

Hrm, I posted just fine...did you do the maths?

[WNCmotard]

Yep, their server / code appears to have pooped the bed.

[stonykill]

 What we really need is more participation on GTA for our own review section. To my eyes anyway that is far more important to GTA than reviews from another site.

[stonykill]

rule violation number 14- No cross-posting. Decide WHICH gate fits your post best and post ONLY one thread. Do not post the same thread in multiple gates. Duplicates will be deleted.

[stonykill]

oops. Double post

[palonej]

Am I missing something??  Didn't mean what??

[HCAirgunner]

They're talking about a review that Tom did on a Daisy 880 that they felt was unfair.

http://www.gatewaytoairguns.org/GTA/index.php?topic=61640.240

Starting with reply # 248 by Stonykill:

Stonykill wrote: it is a shame he is testing a 14 year old 880 that probably 364 days a year on average sits in a closet. There is no way the review will in any way at all reflect what is being sold now. Shame really as his review will influence MANY....

[stonykill]

They're talking about a review that Tom did on a Daisy 880 that they felt was unfair.

http://www.gatewaytoairguns.org/GTA/index.php?topic=61640.240

Starting with reply # 248 by Stonykill:

Stonykill wrote: it is a shame he is testing a 14 year old 880 that probably 364 days a year on average sits in a closet. There is no way the review will in any way at all reflect what is being sold now. Shame really as his review will influence MANY....

 not unfair. Simply not representative of what the average Joe will buy new. A 14 year old AG will have seals not as tight as a new one. As I said to BB a few times, I have a 14 year old 856. It was a tack driver. UNTIL it sat in a closet for 5 years. Now it needs new seals. Still shoots but velocity's are of course all over the place.

   If you read through that thread you will see even the person who asked BB to do the review was disappointed.

   I'm way more interested in the threads we have here , over the years on how ANY AG performs, before and after tweeking than I am from a review elsewhere.