You are rite and I wouldn't want to go against a bore with a small cal. gun.A friend of mine and I shot one in his back yard a few years ago with pistols mine was a 357 mag. at close range. Toughest dern thing I ever seen to put down.
Quote from: PGunner on August 17, 2013, 08:53:23 PMYou are rite and I wouldn't want to go against a bore with a small cal. gun.A friend of mine and I shot one in his back yard a few years ago with pistols mine was a 357 mag. at close range. Toughest dern thing I ever seen to put down.It's not entirely about what you shoot it with, or how many times it gets shot. It's a matter of where you shoot it. I've taken 30+lb game animals with a .177 ag's in one shot more than a few times. Get the lead into the brain or heart/lungs and its over.When hunting with ag's the key is precision. Always has been, most likely always will be.
For my sons 18th b-day I took him wild boar hunting in North Carolina He was using the Remington 30-06 that I bought him for his 17th. His shot was a frontal that entered between the neck and right shoulder and exiting behind the last rib on the left side. The pig dropped like a stone one shot one dead boar. The heart and lungs were mush no running and no suffering a , the shot was taken at about 35 yards.
It's funny. Last night at work, I was talking to a couple of my buddies about rifles, and they agreed that you would need at least a 300 win mag to take down an elk. They also agreed that the .270 was not a good long range cartridge, despite the fact that it shoots flatter than a 300 win mag, because it doesn't have enough energy, and also that a grizzly couldn't possibly be taken down by anything weaker than a .30-06. I'm pretty sure that more grizzlies have been killed with a 30-30 than any other cartridge out there. Including the largest grizzly ever taken, if I recall. It wouldn't be my first choice as a defense weapon in Alaska, but I am just saying. Both of the guys are experienced hunters, and claim to have taken a lot of deer- what could I possibly say to them? The best part is that they think a red ryder should be sufficient for rabbit or squirrel hunting. Another of my buddies told me he took a deer at 275 yards with a 30-30 and iron sights. I just kept my mouth shut- except for the part about the red ryder I told them I think it would not penetrate the skull of anything except maybe a small bird- if you could even hit it. I haven't killed anything bigger than a snapping turtle so what could I possibly say to these guys? Another good story is the one my stepson told me, about the 200 lb feral hog his dad and grandpa killed with a shotgun shooting slugs, and a 30-06. He told me they shot it over and over again and it kept running around and getting knocked over. They shot it so many times that by the time they killed it, they were afraid to dress it and eat it for all the damaged meat and slugs in the animal, so they just left it. I wonder how many times that poor animal was gut shot at close range. There is so much misinformation out there, usually spread by word of mouth. I wonder how many "hog hunters" out there even realize where to place a shot on a hog for a clean kill- or if they've even tried to look it up?
Waiting with bated breath