Thank you to our advertisers!
The Great Sumatra 2500 suppressor destruction test
Select Gate
READ GTA FORUM RULES BEFORE POSTING
Welcome New Members
GTA Forum Help Desk
GTA Announcement Gate
Airgun Legislation Actions/Information
Boss's Corner
Dealer Area
GRiP "Gateway to Airguns Review Program"
Airgun Repository of Knowledge
Airgun Content Creator Videos
Airgun Event Videos
Air Arms Airguns
AirForce Airguns
Air Venturi Airguns
Artemis/SPA Airguns
Barra Airguns
Beeman Airguns
Benjamin Airguns
Cometa Airguns
Crosman Airguns
Daisy Airguns
Daystate Airguns
Diana Airguns
Evanix Airguns
FX Airguns
Feinwerkbau
Gamo Airguns
Hatsan Airguns
JTS Airguns
Macavity Arms Airguns
Pinty Airguns
Umarex Airguns
Vintage Air Gun Gate
Weihrauch Airguns
Support Equipment For PCP/HPA/CO2
All Air Gun Accessories Gate
3D printing and files
Optics, Range estimation & related subjects
Scopes And Optics Gate
Tuners
In Memoriam
GTA Contributing Members
Air Gun Gate
BB Guns and Such
"Bob and Lloyds Workshop"
American/U.S. Air Gun Gates
European/Asian Air Gun Gates
PCP/CO2/HPA Air Gun Gates "The Darkside"
Projectiles
Air Archery
Air Guns And Related Accessories Review Gates
Hunting Gate
Machine Shop Talk & AG Parts Machining
***Pay It Forward***
Buyer's, Seller's & Trader's Comments
Bargain Gate
Back Room
Member Classifieds Gate
Hobbyist Classifieds Gate
Target Shooting Discussion Gate
Target Match Rules
Shooting Match Gates
Field Target Gates
The Long Range Club
100 Yard Match
Discussions By States
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Home
About
Help
Old GTA
Gallery
Search
Stats
Login
Register
Advertise Here
GTA
»
Support Equipment For PCP/HPA/CO2 and springers ,rams
»
3D printing and files
(Moderator:
Insanity
) »
The Great Sumatra 2500 suppressor destruction test
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Share This!
Author
Topic: The Great Sumatra 2500 suppressor destruction test (Read 429 times))
bduares
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 998
We are all born mad. Some remain so.
Real Name: Jared
The Great Sumatra 2500 suppressor destruction test
«
on:
April 04, 2025, 10:02:07 AM »
The Great Sumatra 2500 suppressor destruction test will begin today, after it's a civilized time to fire the thing off without waking up the neighbors.
I have 16 moderators ready for testing, some of which are variants printed in different infill percentages, some of which are variants printed on different printers. Example: some of Mike's mod files were absolutely hated by my Neptune 4 Pro, and came out with lumpy textures and banding where they had the text on them. The banding and lumpiness went the entire way around the printed mods. My Anycubic printer printed them out fine. It was an interesting find that the way some brands of printers read the slicer files had differences from other brands.
Columns left to right:
1st column: Mike's Archangel mod and tough Archangel remake in 100% infill. The remake was hated by the Neptune, but I printed it out anyway and then reprinted it on the Anycubic
2nd column: Kent's fluted mod. My original print with the missing end cap which survives being shot through, and 2 copies with end caps, one at 100% infill and one at 50% infill.
3rd column: Kent's first Ruger style remake mod and Buck Rail's Diana Bandit mod in polycarbonate print
4th column: Mike's Ember mod printed on the Neptune, which didn't like the file, and Kent's second and final Ruger style mod
5th column: Mike's Standard .22 mod, Pete's shorter and long mods
6th column: Mike's Ember printed on the Anycubic, and finally Pete's Tesla mod printed on the Neptune. I have another Tesla printed on the Anycubic already attached to the Sumatra.
I will be firing 218-25-RF-D6 cast slugs weighing 23.4 gr. which the Sumatra shoots at 1171 fps (71 fpe) with a moderator attached when the power wheel is dialed 4 clicks back from max. The last test of 4 unpainted mods resulted in destruction of all 4. These have all been painted with Rustoleum 2x Ultra Cover primer & paint in Satin Black.
More to follow this afternoon
«
Last Edit: April 04, 2025, 10:42:39 AM by bduares
»
Logged
USA, TX and UK, London
Stoeger ATAC S2 Suppressor .22
Umarex Origin .22
Xisico XSP 120D
Diana Bandit .22
Sumatra 2500 .22 with African Air Ordinance power upgrade
AEA Challenger SL .357
QM-23 Bullpup .22
3D Printers
Ender 3 heavily modded
Anycubic Mega S
Elegoo Neptune 4 Pro
bduares
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 998
We are all born mad. Some remain so.
Real Name: Jared
Re: The Great Sumatra 2500 suppressor destruction test
«
Reply #1 on:
April 04, 2025, 12:28:47 PM »
I have the Sumatra tuned all the way down as slow as I can make it shoot. It is now set up to hit 317 m/s or 1040 fps with 23.4 gr. slugs, so it can shoot subsonic. This should make the test more interesting in determining what the suppressors sound like.
Logged
USA, TX and UK, London
Stoeger ATAC S2 Suppressor .22
Umarex Origin .22
Xisico XSP 120D
Diana Bandit .22
Sumatra 2500 .22 with African Air Ordinance power upgrade
AEA Challenger SL .357
QM-23 Bullpup .22
3D Printers
Ender 3 heavily modded
Anycubic Mega S
Elegoo Neptune 4 Pro
bduares
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 998
We are all born mad. Some remain so.
Real Name: Jared
Re: The Great Sumatra 2500 suppressor destruction test
«
Reply #2 on:
April 04, 2025, 03:54:24 PM »
Gun: Seneca Sumatra 2500. Slug weight: 23.4 gr. Low power 1040 fps or 317m/s 56 fpe. High power 1200 fps 74.8 fpe. I was having a little trouble with the magazine because the slugs were fresh cast and not sized, and my magazine o-ring mod is not all the way finished and get's in the way of things a bit. These suppressors have all been painted with Rustoleum 2x Ultra Cover primer & paint in Satin Black.
I started things off at low power with Kent's fluted suppressor at 50% infill. Then the same suppressor at 100% infill, then the 50% at high power. It exploded. The 100% infill survived. Interestingly, the 50% infill was quieter than the 100% infill version.
All other suppressors are at 100% infill.
Next was Mike's Archangel. At low power it is ok. At high power it exploded.
Next up, Kent's modified Ruger design. It survived low but on high power it exploded.
On to Kent's upgraded modified Ruger design. It survives low and high power.
Mike's Archangel heavy redesign. It also survives low and high power.
Pete's Tesla design. It survives low and high power.
Pete's short and long designs also survived low and high power.
Mike's shorty Ember design also survives low and high power. Very surprising! Quiet too.
Mike's Standard .22 design also survived low and high power.
Buck Rail's Diana Bandit suppressor in poly carbonate also survives low and high power.
Then my original print of Kurt's fluted design with no end cap. It still survives low and high power.
«
Last Edit: April 04, 2025, 04:20:41 PM by bduares
»
Logged
USA, TX and UK, London
Stoeger ATAC S2 Suppressor .22
Umarex Origin .22
Xisico XSP 120D
Diana Bandit .22
Sumatra 2500 .22 with African Air Ordinance power upgrade
AEA Challenger SL .357
QM-23 Bullpup .22
3D Printers
Ender 3 heavily modded
Anycubic Mega S
Elegoo Neptune 4 Pro
OldCrow
Plinker
Posts: 106
Facillimum est dimidium veritatis credere.
Real Name: Mike
Re: The Great Sumatra 2500 suppressor destruction test
«
Reply #3 on:
April 04, 2025, 06:11:00 PM »
Impressive Jared!
You remind me of myself a bit. Lots of work went into that test. Thank you very much. You taught me something about why they fail.
Greatly appreciated!
Mike
Logged
USA, VA
Facillimum est dimidium veritatis credere.
bduares
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 998
We are all born mad. Some remain so.
Real Name: Jared
Re: The Great Sumatra 2500 suppressor destruction test
«
Reply #4 on:
April 04, 2025, 06:42:14 PM »
A couple of the interesting things I learned from the test were:
The paint seemed to strengthen the prints to the point where previous unpainted prints exploded while painted ones survived high power. Yay for solvents!
At least at low power (50 fpe) 50% infill printed suppressors were quieter than 100% infill prints. Perhaps the extra empty spaces inside them quieted them down a bit.
Your Ember was the smallest of all the suppressors I tested, but it was not the loudest by far.
Logged
USA, TX and UK, London
Stoeger ATAC S2 Suppressor .22
Umarex Origin .22
Xisico XSP 120D
Diana Bandit .22
Sumatra 2500 .22 with African Air Ordinance power upgrade
AEA Challenger SL .357
QM-23 Bullpup .22
3D Printers
Ender 3 heavily modded
Anycubic Mega S
Elegoo Neptune 4 Pro
subscriber
GTA Senior Contributor
Posts: 7295
yes
Re: The Great Sumatra 2500 suppressor destruction test
«
Reply #5 on:
April 05, 2025, 03:56:28 AM »
Thanks for doing all that work, Jared.
Which moderator had the best sound reduction/tone quality at high and low power (could be different ones)? I have my own idea, but then I am biased.
Logged
USA
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
GTA
»
Support Equipment For PCP/HPA/CO2 and springers ,rams
»
3D printing and files
(Moderator:
Insanity
) »
The Great Sumatra 2500 suppressor destruction test