Quote from: YankeeDude on November 04, 2011, 12:58:17 AMQuote from: Smackey54 on October 27, 2011, 09:34:17 PMI am really looking forward to holding it in my hands and against my shoulder...and to see how it compares with my WFH..(I'm curious to see if the Falcon Hunter was "dumbed down" for we Americans). QUESTION: Since the performance specs for the Model 95 and the Walther Falcon Hunter ( Model 125 ) are not the same, how can you directly compare the two ?The specs for the Model 95 are .177 = 1000 fps, .22 = 800 fps, .25 = 650 fpsThe specs for the Model 125 are .177 = 1250 fps, .22 = 1000 fps, .25= 750 fpsI have been looking at the WFH but have been holding off, due to the stock cracking problems that have been reported. I was looking at the Model 135 but am concerned that it might be too heavy, especially with a scope, for comfortable off-hand shooting and carrying while hunting. The Model 95 looks like it may have a shorter "pull", which should cure issues with setting the scope far enough rearward for proper eye relief, another complaint I heard about the WFH / 125. I wish the Model 95 had the "punch" of the 125 or the 135 . . . Can you guys that have a Model 95 please tell me more about it ?Is there a Nitro Piston for the Model 95 ?I have not gotten my Mod 95 yet. I do have WFH. I was more curious about the power plant and mechanical performance differences between the Turkish guns already here and the ones that should be arriving soon, when I said, "dumbed down"....meaning that we Americans, for the most part, seem to be more interested in velocity than shooting smoothness, accuracy, and shooting pleasure...and that the WFH was sold in America to try to satisfy that "thirst for speed". I was not trying to compare the WFH to the Mod 95 directly by specs.Mark
Quote from: Smackey54 on October 27, 2011, 09:34:17 PMI am really looking forward to holding it in my hands and against my shoulder...and to see how it compares with my WFH..(I'm curious to see if the Falcon Hunter was "dumbed down" for we Americans). QUESTION: Since the performance specs for the Model 95 and the Walther Falcon Hunter ( Model 125 ) are not the same, how can you directly compare the two ?The specs for the Model 95 are .177 = 1000 fps, .22 = 800 fps, .25 = 650 fpsThe specs for the Model 125 are .177 = 1250 fps, .22 = 1000 fps, .25= 750 fpsI have been looking at the WFH but have been holding off, due to the stock cracking problems that have been reported. I was looking at the Model 135 but am concerned that it might be too heavy, especially with a scope, for comfortable off-hand shooting and carrying while hunting. The Model 95 looks like it may have a shorter "pull", which should cure issues with setting the scope far enough rearward for proper eye relief, another complaint I heard about the WFH / 125. I wish the Model 95 had the "punch" of the 125 or the 135 . . . Can you guys that have a Model 95 please tell me more about it ?Is there a Nitro Piston for the Model 95 ?
I am really looking forward to holding it in my hands and against my shoulder...and to see how it compares with my WFH..(I'm curious to see if the Falcon Hunter was "dumbed down" for we Americans).