Quote from: tom96 on August 27, 2011, 10:09:48 PMfor anyone saying the cfx is more accurate heres why flies shouldn't land on my 30yard target when i have the 34 out.22 rws 34 @30yardsCFX .177: Ya don't know how good she was to us, son,,, ya just don't know.
for anyone saying the cfx is more accurate heres why flies shouldn't land on my 30yard target when i have the 34 out.22 rws 34 @30yards
Mike, I had the Royal and, to be frank, the stock was nothing to write home about. Same quality as the 440. It was in .22 and I sold it, then found out that Charlie had done a full blown tune to it. Had I known ..........but that's another story. Charlie's trigger, BTW, was pretty darned sweet in that gun. The CFX owes much of it's accuracy to having been designed by BSA in the first place. As I said, above, they can be about as good as a 34 for a bit less money. Certainly no flies on them, no pun intended.Regarding the CFX in FT competition, you might be alluding to the CFX that @@$$$&^( worked up for Jock Elliot. I believe Jock one a smallish match with it, but did prove that a CFX can, indeed, run with the big boys. Almost bought that gun from him a while back. There are no under levers as nice anywhere near the price.