FWIW, my Hw30S' and R7 all three like the 7.33 gr. pellets. Nobody seems to like the CPLD's?
Nobody seems to like the CPLD's?
Thanks... never saw the "lights" before.
Quote from: Hoosier Daddy on February 03, 2017, 08:52:36 PMThanks... never saw the "lights" before.Crosman Premier Light Dome. They can be ordered through Walmart, PA et al. They are lousily packaged by Crosman 1250 to the box. The box will run you $30 (+/-). I thought my Blue 97K might like 'em but the jury is still out on that.
The logical consequence of bent skirts is varying amounts of blow-by resulting in velocity variations. With the thin skirts and soft lead of the 7.3gr, one would expect them to obturate easily and seal against the bore before there has been much blow-by. Perhaps that's why those with slightly deformed skirts still group well for you at 18 yards. At longer distances, that velocity variation would tend to become more noticeable. Putting a few bent pellets and good pellets over the chronograph would tell the story.To share a recent experiment with the same pellets, I was shooting test groups with a new Crosman 2400KT with a 14" LW barrel. Of all the pellets I tried, it grouped best with the tin of Air Arms 7.3gr. By flaring the skirts ever so slightly with the end of a 1/4" phono plug, the average velocity jumped up from 670fps to 700fps. That is almost a 10% increase in energy (8.0fpe vs 7.3fpe). Because they were grouping well at 25 yards (ragged hole 5-shot groups), I could pick out about a 1/4" vertical shift. As I recall, the Chairgun prediction was a pretty close match. To be clear, this scenario was a little different than yours--comparing flared skirts to otherwise unbent skirts--but hopefully gives some perspective.