GTA
Airguns by Make and Model => Diana Airguns => Topic started by: Rickey on October 26, 2011, 11:02:49 PM
-
Can any one tell me where to find a list that tell what trigger is in whitch RWS rifle?
-
MMMM not sure but if you can't find out that info you can always ask on the gun in question and I'm sure you'll get you answer! :P
-
Rick if your looking at the RWS they are great out of the box. POWERHOUSE GUNS that are much different than the Crosmans You have had. The two I have have are the RWS 350 Feuerkraft in the .177 and the .22. WITH the TO5 trigger, and I would say they are crisp and as good as the tuna trigger you have had. BOTH are classic magnums. Can't speak for the TO6 but there products are outstanding, at least what I have is. Triggers are light and crisp, no lag and the guns are well made. The 350 is a lot heavier and longer than the TRAIL and much much more gun. STRAIGHT SHOOTERS. Wished I had found these before the trail. I got mine on the close outs and have less in them than the trail.
-
I don't think there is a list for that specific info (at least that I've seen). The trigger changes occurred when Diana redesigned their triggers. which trigger is on a gun is more a result of when it was manufactured. For example: You could have 3 M34's and one would be a T01, one a T05 and the newest a T06.
Nathan
-
Can any one tell me where to find a list that tell what trigger is in whitch RWS rifle?
The Pyramyd Air site seems to be the best for listing the trigger "T0" type with each RWS gun. Just type in the gun in the search box and it takes you to the specs page for the gun.
-
Yes I think I've made my decision. At AOA they have the Model 34 Pro for $189 with the 3x9x40 RWS scope.It isn't the Compact but according to the sales it will be easier to shoot accurately that the 350 Feuerkraft because it is lighter and the Feuerkraft doesn't come with a scope. More expense with the scope. Question how good are the RWS scopes?
-
I have 3 of them. 3-9 x 44 AO Night Pro AND 2 4-32 AO. So far no issues on mine. For my needs inthe back yard a 3-9 is an over kill for such shot distances. I do like the AO.
-
The 34's are awesome rifles, I have 2 .177 and .22 with the t05 triggers.
They are great out of the box, and very accurate and in my opinion easier to shoot then the 350's.
Don't get me wrong the 350's are very accurate just not as easy to shoot as the 34's.
Rob
-
Was the 48 ever made with the T01 trigger? A friend of mine has one that isn't marked with a TO-anything. Mine says Diana Model 48 T 05.
Mine was made in 08 of 05, or 05 of 08, depending whether the month or the year of manufacture is the first number in the date code.
IIRC, his is from 2001.
-
Yes kid that's what I was told by AOA sales. Lighter so easier to hold and just as accurate. The one I'm thinking on is the 34 Pro full size. It has the T05 trigger and from what I've heard it is a good trigger. Nothing like the Trail trigger. Now what to do with the Gold trigger I got for the Trail. I guess put it in a box somewhere so I can forget where it is. I think I'm going to wait on the Leepers mount and see how good the Rws mount holds the scope.
-
Yes the 48 was made with the T01 trigger :P
-
RWS MOUNT if a solid mount will please you. He is right the 350 is a magnum gun. LONG, HEAVY AND A POWERHOUSE. Not tame. As for the trigger, do as I have at this point hang it on the wall. Still is a great trigger and a great improvement for any gun it will fit and it fits many. TUNA triggers are well worth the money spent but just want fit the RWS plus it has a good stock trigger and the gun will shoot without any mods out of the box.
-
That's good to know. I told my wife that the 34 Pro is supposed to be a good gun. She said that's what you said about the last one. Someone said it wouldn't be hard to put a shroud on it. I was wondering if the muzzle break could be converted into a shroud of sorts.
-
That muzzle break should be a muzzle wieght its heavy. Its very hard to keep tight I got disgusted at trying to keep one tight so bad I threw it out in trash. Looking back I should have sold it LOL
If you slid it forward there would be alot of internal volume but I am not sure all the mass hanging out there would still be shootable or the barrel latch would hold it. Its 12 OZ plus
Mine is now wearing a smaller muzzle cover
If I was doing it all over I would skip the 34 Pro in .177 and just get a 34 in 22 cal and a T06....and buy a scope and mount.
That package deal one has no MIL-DOTS!!!!!
-
You won't need the shroud on that gun. I know they make claims that it makes the somewhat quieter and takes some of the harmonics out of the gun. They make the guns look better. Don't think you will want to mess with it.I think that after you get the gun and see how these guns shot you will want to just shot. These guns are nothing like what you have been dealing with. I AGREE on the .22 but I understand that you have issues in finding that ammo.
-
When I bought my 34 .22 it came with the rws 300 scope 4x32, excellent clarity but no mildots, my 34 .177 came with the rws 350 scope very compact but could not hold a zero on a heavier hitting springer, but worked well with the rws 24 .22.
My latest scope from that line is a 4-12x50 ao scope, at 12 times it is not the clearest, the bushnells I have are far clearer as was the the leapers..but it has mildots, something the bushnell banner does not.
As for the 3-9x40 i do not know what there like. You will like that gun, at 24 yards I have stacked pellets on top of each other, formed a ball of lead that fit inside a dime, great guns.
Rob