GTA

All Springer/NP/PCP Air Gun Discussion General => PCP/CO2/HPA Air Gun Gates "The Darkside" => Topic started by: Mole2017 on June 12, 2020, 01:30:54 AM

Title: Desiccator Experiment Results…and what happened to my compressor
Post by: Mole2017 on June 12, 2020, 01:30:54 AM
You might have seen my post last week about my shop compressor kicking the bucket, leading me to take a close look at my brass fill probe. The demise of the compressor was also the impetus to conclude an experiment involving this compressor that I started in April 2019.

Around March of last year, I discovered some moisture in the buddy bottle of my R10 and some moisture-related fowling of parts in the rifle itself. To tell the truth, it wasn’t clear then if the moisture was my fault or that of the previous owner, but it was disturbing. I cleaned things up and did two things towards prevention of a repeat occurrence:
Here’s the system set up for pumping, with the now-deceased compressor:
(https://www.gatewaytoairguns.org/GTA/MGalleryItem.php?id=6341)

Desiccation Experiment

The boost has been nice, but now that the compressor has died, it was time to check on the 325 grams of silica gel inside the compressor tank. I unscrewed the drain and dumped out what would come out. After drying, I recovered 252 grams of silica gel, meaning there are still almost 75 grams inside. I hear some of it still moving around, but I suspect some of it may be stuck to things. Here's the rusty debris that came out with my silica gel:

(https://www.gatewaytoairguns.org/GTA/MGalleryItem.php?id=7346)

This compressor wasn’t new when I started this. I had already had it a few years and found rusty water in it a couple times when I drained it.

Anyway, the silica. Did it work? Well, after a year in the tank, what I dumped out weighed 275 grams before drying. Just 23 grams after a year of use and no interventions to drain the tank? I don’t go through a lot of air—maybe filled this thing a dozen times in the year. The compressor fills the tank to 110 PSI (or so) and I let it sit overnight and then use that air to fill my rifle until the tank pressure gets below 20 PSI. Since the regulators leaks so much, that is about 2 fills, or maybe 3 if I am lucky.

So, is 23 grams of water an accomplishment? Considering that the 252 grams of dry silica now weighs over 317 grams just from sitting out on my kitchen counter a little over 24 hours during some humid weather—absorbed 65 grams from atmospheric pressure air—I’d say it must have helped somehow. The inside of that compressor tank was bone dry—just dusty beads and rust flakes.

Did I mention it was dry and rusty inside? My silica gel was the normal pale colored almost-white beads but is now rust-orange, as shown in this photo (it goes to the bin next):

(https://www.gatewaytoairguns.org/GTA/MGalleryItem.php?id=7347)

Compressor Postmortem

Speaking of rust, let’s turn this to into a public service announcement. Do you have an air compressor? Take a moment to drain the water and remember to drain it regularly or install something to do it for you. Do you have an old compressor? Think seriously about ditching it unless you know it was well cared for.

So, having a dead compressor, it was time to take it apart. But first, a look at the inlet side of my tank regulator:

(https://www.gatewaytoairguns.org/GTA/MGalleryItem.php?id=7348)

Die cast metal does not like moisture. This part was mounted on the backside of the upper tank of the two little tanks that make up this unit. (Got and old, low cost compressor…?) This compressor might have been 10 years old and was used decidedly infrequently. I bought on sale for the small nail gun that the bundle included.

What was the cause of the failure? Not quite sure of the cause, but here is a picture of the mode of failure:

(https://www.gatewaytoairguns.org/GTA/MGalleryItem.php?id=7349)

A contact on the commutator “ring” came off (I found it in the bottom of the motor housing). It actually ran in this condition but did weird things like “skip”, change speeds, and--just before I shut it off—stall outright for a few seconds at a time.

So, now a Makita MAC210Q has taken its place. This unit is doesn’t have intercooling and moisture traps like the big ones, so I plan to give it a load of silica gel too and see how that does. And it is so much more quiet! I used to start the other one and leave the room as fast as I could!

The Buddy Bottle

That leaves the buddy bottle. Inside my buddy bottle there is a piece of ordinary paper, rolled small enough to fit through the neck of the bottle and sealed with I think 6 or 8 grams of silica gel inside it. I don’t have plans to open that real soon, but I might be into the rifle valve and regulator areas later this summer and I’ll decide then how it may be doing. 6 grams is more than enough to hold the amount of water I had found that started all this last year.

And that’s my story. Not an option for everybody, but it seems to have worked for me. If I find myself with some time on my hands, I may cut the end of that compressor tank to see what I find--that would be good to add here. Feel free to describe what you are doing to control moisture.
Title: Re: Desiccator Experiment Results…and what happened to my compressor
Post by: Doug Wall on June 12, 2020, 10:12:35 AM
None of your pictures show up. One thing that you have to remember is that not all of the moisture from your boost compressor will end up in the tank! A lot of it will go through the hose. That's why painters, and Shoebox owners always have a desiccant unit BETWEEN the output of the first compressor, and the final unit. In general, it's a vary bad idea to put desiccant inside the tanks! You have very little control like that, and for the boost compressor, you could easily overload the desiccant inside, and end up with a muddy mess. If you get all of the moisture out of the hand pump feed stream, you don't need desiccant on the output side, or in the buddy bottle(or gun).
As you said, drain the boost compressor tank regularly, and something like this would be good on the output of the boost, so you can observe the indicating desiccant for color change.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/1-2-IN-LINE-DESICCANT-AIR-DRYER-FOR-COMPRESSED-AIR-PNEUMATIC-TOOLS-PAINT-SPRAY/192009639698?_trkparms=aid%3D1110007%26algo%3DHOMESPLICE.DISC%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D20200220090753%26meid%3Dd16cc691b2094738be39b4ade7d00277%26pid%3D100009%26rk%3D1%26rkt%3D1%26sd%3D402271953000%26itm%3D192009639698%26pmt%3D1%26noa%3D0%26pg%3D2047675%26algv%3Ddefault%26brand%3DUnbranded&_trksid=p2047675.c100009.m1982 (https://www.ebay.com/itm/1-2-IN-LINE-DESICCANT-AIR-DRYER-FOR-COMPRESSED-AIR-PNEUMATIC-TOOLS-PAINT-SPRAY/192009639698?_trkparms=aid%3D1110007%26algo%3DHOMESPLICE.DISC%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D20200220090753%26meid%3Dd16cc691b2094738be39b4ade7d00277%26pid%3D100009%26rk%3D1%26rkt%3D1%26sd%3D402271953000%26itm%3D192009639698%26pmt%3D1%26noa%3D0%26pg%3D2047675%26algv%3Ddefault%26brand%3DUnbranded&_trksid=p2047675.c100009.m1982)
Title: Re: Desiccator Experiment Results…and what happened to my compressor
Post by: Mole2017 on June 12, 2020, 11:04:13 AM
Sorry about the pictures; I can only guess it is platform related as I'm using the GTA media folders to "host" the pictures and embed them with the post editor.

I'm not sure I follow your comments, so I'll see if I can recap. For sure, in large flow rate/high usage situations you will need more than I have done and inline as you describe. So, my approach is hardly a fire-and-forget solution for everyone. Silica gel by itself is not corrosive, but the blue colored stuff is. In fact, it is toxic too and banned in many countries. Fortunately, there are alternative indicating silica gels available.

My situation is a small dedicated compressor that gets run so infrequently that moisture collects so slowly as to make it hard to drain any. (If I ran it and used it a couple hours for a project, I could see some serious water starting to collect.) I wanted a way to capture it coming at these slow rates. Not having the option to tear my compressor plumbing apart to insert a drier, I put it in the tank, just to see. If my tank had one of those inspection ports, I would have put a bag or two of this in there.

That it captured and held 23 grams tells me it was accomplishing something (it adsorbed three times that amount sitting out in my kitchen). I'd be interested to hear what the adsorb and release behavior of silica is as the tank pressure varies; I haven't looked it up myself. For example, when first filled, the relative humidity is high and the silica adsorbs a bunch; but use some air, change the temperatures, or whatever, and the conditions change and the silica either tries to take up more moisture or lets some go, e.g. this chart (https://www.flowdry.com/news/2015/10/silica-gel-desiccant-versus-molecular-sieve-adsorbent-which-desiccant-is-best.htm).

The packet in the buddy bottle is the one I really would like to see. I did that one because I already had opened the buddy bottle and found a gram or two of water. It just has to keep me out of condensed water situations. If I open that and find a bone dry bottle, I'll consider it a success, and the results with this small compressor lead me to think it will work.

Given that some other GTA users hand pump without any moisture control devices and seem to be doing ok, e.g. this GTA thread (https://www.gatewaytoairguns.org/GTA/index.php?topic=31513.0), anything has a chance of being helpful. For what it is worth, hand pumping atmospheric air (i.e. no boost), can haul in a lot of moisture. Consider Ribbonstone's results discussed here (https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/yellow/dry-pac-testing-t155379.html#p1457268).
Title: Re: Desiccator Experiment Results…and what happened to my compressor
Post by: Doug Wall on June 12, 2020, 12:51:41 PM
" Not having the option to tear my compressor plumbing apart to insert a drier, I put it in the tank, just to see"
I've never seen a compressor that you couldn't easily take off the output fitting to install a dryer/filter. If you wanted to, you could easily build a desiccant canister for the input side of the compressor as well, and keep a lot out of the tank. I have a small desiccant (about 7", around $30 on ebay) on the output of my Nomad II, that wouldn't be too bad on a boosted hand pump, that's a lot easier to check than pulling a tank valve off.
"Given that some other GTA users hand pump without any moisture control devices and seem to be doing ok, "
I have regular contact with a Crosman certified service station, and from what they tell me, virtually all of the leaking guns that they have come in, have internal corrosion from moisture, and have been hand pumped without desiccant.

Title: Re: Desiccator Experiment Results…and what happened to my compressor
Post by: Ribbonstone on June 12, 2020, 01:21:14 PM
Wow....you dug up that old post that made me a non-beliver (in my climate) of the Dry Pac.

Updated.
The Hills died from neglect....started using a chinese pump and figured I'd use it until it diedfor everything.It didn't die. Still working like 8 years later.

Compressor or (cheap Chinese)handpump.  Tend to silicone grease the internals of the rifle's air tubes (thin...like waxing a car) and not worry about moisture.

Still hand pump the little volume guns...and the 2K guns.  Only break out the compressor for big volumes or higher than 3K pressures.

Just had the oldest two apart (11 and 17 years)....no rust/corrosion in the pressure area of the air tube.
Title: Re: Desiccator Experiment Results…and what happened to my compressor
Post by: AlanMcD on June 12, 2020, 01:38:36 PM
I see your pictures just fine . . .

I will agree that putting desiccant in the tanks is not really a good idea.  I would not want them in any tank I use to feed an airgun, as desiccant beads can fracture when hit with liquid water, and that can release very fine abrasive particles in the air you are feeding into your guns.  I think it would be better to use a good sized desiccant filter in your airflow path to your hand pump, keeping the water out of it and out of your tanks in the first place.

Compressors are made to deal with condensation, thus the ability to vent/drain them.  While it is a good idea to drain them regularly, under regular usage the inside of the tanks get wet and stay wet - by definition of their duty, the inside of those tanks are subjected to 100% humidity their whole life.  And since it impossible to get "all" of the condensed water out when draining them, and any remaining water won't ever evaporate as the humidity in the tank is almost always at 100%, we know what that means - as do the tank manufacturers: the inside of compressor tanks always have some amount of liquid water in them.

Yes, eventually compressors will fail from corrosion.  My oil free shop compressor is about 26 years old and it still runs great - but it is darn loud.  It is no issue for feeding my Shoebox compressor in my workshop, as the shop compressor is in the garage and the air is plumbed into my house/shop.  But man it is loud when I am in the garage with it . . . and I expect if I replace it the reason will be that I finally decided to get a quieter compressor, long before its tank rusts through.
Title: Re: Desiccator Experiment Results…and what happened to my compressor
Post by: UnderPressure on June 12, 2020, 01:45:46 PM
How well did adding the additional stage (via compressor) work for hand pumping?

What did you notice most by doing this?

Title: Re: Desiccator Experiment Results…and what happened to my compressor
Post by: Mole2017 on June 12, 2020, 01:49:20 PM
Thanks Ribbonstone! Yeah, when I found that post I knew that was data to keep a finger on and bookmarked it.

And Doug, yes, your observations are fair enough. Some people pump without desiccant and nothing happens. In 2019 it wasn't looking like I was one of them. Something on the outlet of the pump was doable and I have seen plenty of designs, including ones like yours posted this past January. But in a moment of Rube Goldbergness or just plain cheap opportunity, I popped it in the tank. I knew it wasn't going to come out conveniently, but here was an opportunity to find out. I forget the details, but I may have done the packet for the R10 bottle first and thought "why not?" and threw some into the little Campbell Hausfeld just to see what happened.

The Makita has somewhat better access to the tank plumbing, and the fitting for the metal pipe/tube from the compressor is twice the size of the drain plug and sure is tempting. The problem there is factory installed threadlock that I'm not sure I want to mettle with. But, again, here is a compressor that is going to do a lot of sitting around, so I might just give it the same treatment too. But I want to work out a better way to get the material in and out of the unit.

Alan posted while I was working on this reply. That "always at 100%" part was on my mind for both the buddy bottle and the compressor. Given the relatively low volume and an hunch about how much water I was dealing with, I figured it was worth a try. And that silica gel came out holding something like 10% of its weight in water, meaning, I think, (a) it was nowhere near full and (b) the tank wasn't at 100% RH either--maybe 20% judging from the charts. Win-win, except for some inconvenience.

I also though about the silica dust, but with the fine rust already in the tank I didn't think it was going to contribute much.
Title: Re: Desiccator Experiment Results…and what happened to my compressor
Post by: Mole2017 on June 12, 2020, 01:59:15 PM
Russ, I like the boosted hand pumping a lot. It has been a while since I did a fill "unassisted" but the stroke count would end up as high as 160 strokes if I had let pressure get really low. 120 to 130 seems about right--40 strokes, take a break, repeat about three times for at least about 3000 PSI. At which point I often opted to call it done!

Now with a boost around 10-15 PSI (cheap gauges are hard to read...why does a pump with a 110 PSI limit have a 250 PSI gauge?), it is more like 80 strokes. You can boost at higher pressures to start, but I usually end up cutting back some near the end because it does become a little more work. The pump does warm up more; not too hot to touch, but warm. Taking a break helps with that.

If you boost, consider putting a cut-off valve on the compressor outlet. My line was threaded onto the compressor outlet, so I made the cut-valve part of that plumbing. It lets you shut of the air and take a few strokes to bring the pressures back down to "normal" before venting the hand pump and disconnecting the hoses. The Makita has a quick disconnect fitting already, so recycled my old compressor hose and the cut-off, adding a matching disconnect fitting to them.

Title: Re: Desiccator Experiment Results…and what happened to my compressor
Post by: KnifeMaker on June 12, 2020, 05:04:30 PM
Putting the beads in the tank is a sure way to super charge rusting. Huge mistake!  It will catch and hold the water against the tank and becomes itself, corrosive. And why the beads have to be change out regularly and dried. Putting it in the tank will greatly  increase rust on a grand scale!


Knife
Title: Re: Desiccator Experiment Results…and what happened to my compressor
Post by: Mole2017 on June 13, 2020, 12:00:45 AM
Putting the beads in the tank is a sure way to super charge rusting. Huge mistake!  It will catch and hold the water against the tank and becomes itself, corrosive. And why the beads have to be change out regularly and dried. Putting it in the tank will greatly  increase rust on a grand scale!


Knife

Blue silica gel, yes, guaranteed, as it contains a salt. But plain silica? I'm still looking for data on that and haven't found any. By itself, it is chemically safe.

So, I'm going to postulate that there are two issues here. One is the old school blue indicating silica has given silica gel a bad rap, i.e. everyone thinks it a huge no-no to have loose silica beads in a tank. Two is that overloaded silica, i.e. soaking wet, is no better than wet sand and the water will lead to corrosion.

In fact, I just finished reading a paper that studied the addition of microscopic silica particles to improve the performance of coatings to protect steel from corrosion.

We have to remember how silica gel and molecular sieves work: microscopic porosity that literally traps water molecules. Both are chemically inert for our purposes. A chemist will have to chime in, but I suspect a water molecule trapped in a silica bead isn't going to be able to interact with metal that the bead is touching. I just spent some time looking online and found perforated steel cans that are filled with silica gel beads and used in gun safes. And you know what? some guy gave it a one star review after figuring out his wasn't made of aluminum, claiming that being steel it was doomed to rust out. One review did mention rust, but it was all over the can (outside) and his desiccant was already overloaded and past due to be recharged.

As for changing it out from time to time, yes, that is needed because the whole point is to have a place for the moisture to be trapped--once full, the silica gel and molecular sieve aren't doing anything for you. It is true that sealed in my tank like this I don't have a way to monitor moisture other than pull it out and check, which was part of the plan anyway. Since my compressor usage is actually quite low, I've actually had very little water to contain.
Title: Re: Desiccator Experiment Results…and what happened to my compressor
Post by: KnifeMaker on June 13, 2020, 09:04:29 PM
Yet you have shown the horrible results. Hello! ::)
Title: Re: Desiccator Experiment Results…and what happened to my compressor
Post by: Mole2017 on June 13, 2020, 11:16:32 PM
Yet you have shown the horrible results. Hello! ::)

Don't forget this was a nearly 10 year old compressor. Water had already been in the tank at times prior to my experiment and rusty water had been seen in the past, i.e. rust was there before the silica was introduced (my mistake for leaving water in there long enough to do that).

This compressor has two tanks (shown in that first photograph); the bottom one is the one with the drain and that had held the silica. That is important because the upper tank is connected by a small bent tube (the new models have a fat straight stub between them). I can't remember how I held it while I loaded the silica, but I don't think any ended up in the upper tank. And I know there is no way it ended up in that regulator body.

It must also be remembered that water vapor in a tank doesn't conveniently condense at the bottom. It condenses on all surfaces that are cool enough to permit condensation. That includes all surfaces of the top and bottom tanks and the inlet side of the regulator. And each surface remains wet until a heat source sufficiently warms that surface or the relative humidity drops low enough to let things dry out.

This would explain the corrosion on the regulator inlet side. The outlet side was totally clean.

Judging by the moisture loading of the silica when I removed it (barely 1/3 of its capacity), relative humidity in this tank was about 20 percent and all surfaces would have been dry, i.e. not enough moisture to maintain active corrosion. (Everything I shook out was dusty and dry.) That's why we put this stuff in our gun safes and other storage systems. Silica gel packs are put inside new equipment and products so that environmental conditions during shipment and storage can't trigger condensation--the desiccant lowers the relative humidity and moisture dependent problems go away.

I'll try cut the tanks open soon and see if I can get some photographs. I predict some amount of rust on all surfaces in both tanks. It will be worse or at least different at the bottom of each tank where water would lay after rolling down the sides.
Title: Re: Desiccator Experiment Results…and what happened to my compressor
Post by: Mole2017 on June 15, 2020, 09:25:53 PM
Rust report

Yesterday I cut both tanks open. I didn’t have a power tool that could do it safely, so I restrained it as best I could and went to work with a hack saw. These tanks are about 4.5" across, and the tank walls are 2 mm thick. I got lucky cutting where I did. Another 1/8” closer to the end I would have been cutting through twice that as the end caps are pressed in and welded to the cylinder that forms the body of each tank.

Other than some more rusty debris and the last of my silica gel, they are looking much better than I expected. In these two pictures, I had already dumped out the upper tank before cutting open the lower tank; no cleaning has been done:

(https://www.gatewaytoairguns.org/GTA/MGalleryItem.php?id=7363)

(https://www.gatewaytoairguns.org/GTA/MGalleryItem.php?id=7364)

Looks like I never had the full 325 grams of silica in there. That looks like a tablespoon of silica in the bottom of that lower tank, along with some of the "filings" from the hacksaw, i.e. a couple grams.  I must have miscalculated what I put in when I was drying and weighing stuff last year.

Anyway, the big surprise was the rust itself. The bottom tank is close to what I expected, except that the bottom of the tank is in really good shape. I was expecting heavy rust deposits where any water would have laid in the tank. The deposits on the sides are a fine coating rust dust (comes off with a wipe of the finger) with areas of "raised" rust blooms that are "glassy" and crusty (and mostly hollow, like bubbly blisters), not just big flakes of rust. Some areas seem to be benefiting, i.e. protected, from residual oils from manufacture or even overspray of the powder coating. Here is a shot looking at the “top” and far end of the bottom tank:

(https://www.gatewaytoairguns.org/GTA/MGalleryItem.php?id=7365)

In that view you can see from left to right ports for the drain plug, a pressure relief, a small inlet from the compressor, a similar outlet for a pressure switch, and the tube going to the upper tank. Note the blue powder coating on the inside edge of that far end cap.

The upper tank had the weird stuff. I guess those "raised" rust deposits just grew bigger up there. Here's what that looked like:

(https://www.gatewaytoairguns.org/GTA/MGalleryItem.php?id=7370)

And below is a view of the two ends. I've turned the two to be "topside up" so you can see that the rust grew wherever it wanted. Check out the powder coat overspray in that right hand piece from the lower tank. I still haven't figured out how that lower tank got powder coating inside it.

(https://www.gatewaytoairguns.org/GTA/MGalleryItem.php?id=7371)

At first I wondered if the roundish glassy pieces were little corrosion "pearls" seeded with silica beads, but they are in fact mostly hollow. (I did find two silica gel beads up there, but they weren’t involved with anything, just rolling around.) Amazingly, these little “spheres” grew both up and down. Here’s a huge one (almost 1/8" in diameter) with a crack “hanging” in the end of the upper tank that I cut off:

(https://www.gatewaytoairguns.org/GTA/MGalleryItem.php?id=7366)

Below is a picture of the remains of a couple that grew up from the bottom of the upper tank but that got their tops busted by sloshing debris while I manhandled the tank to dump my silica gel. The grey material is metal from the hack saw work. Incidentally the amount of rust debris on the loose in the upper tank was about the somewhat more than what I dumped out of the bottom tank through the drain plug port. It's piled in front of the two end caps pictured above.

(https://www.gatewaytoairguns.org/GTA/MGalleryItem.php?id=7372)

Otherwise, it is just amazing to see how rust “grows” in these environments. This isn’t some backyard scrap pile; it’s like some little coral reef where a rusty spot starts and spreads where it can.

(https://www.gatewaytoairguns.org/GTA/MGalleryItem.php?id=7367)

It is interesting to think of the dynamics here. Suppose the tank (with no silica gel) had been drained. The relative humidity would still be quite high inside and all it would take is a cool spell in my unfinished basement with a loose fitting door to the outside to let moisture condense on the sides and grow some rust and “flowers” until things warmed up again. It may be entirely possible the bottom of either tank never saw much moisture unless enough condensation formed to let some roll to the bottom in the first place. And that lower tank would benefit from its proximity to the floor to reduce cooling there. (Ever notice that a car parked even a couple yards from an outbuilding (not heated) gets a one-sided frost job in cold weather? That points to a difference in loss of heat by radiation.)

Summary

To recap, this tank is 9 years old (found the date tag on it). It was used occasionally for a couple years and then less frequently (like once a year?) until I hatched my plan to use it to fill the BSA R10 last year. I know the water damage happened before I introduced the silica gel. Seeing as the silica gel is completely uninvolved with any of the growths and scale in the tanks and how the bottom of the lower tank is also cleaner looking than the sides and top, I’d say the silica gel did nothing but good for the insides of this compressor tank.

Again, this is not a practical solution for just any situation. If you use your compressor enough that you would be able to drain something regularly from it, I think this stuff would get swamped. But I use mine about once every other month these days just for filling the air rifle. That's all I need it for unless I pull out that little pneumatic nail gun for a rare project to drive a half dozen or so brads.

I like the result so much I'm going to give the Makita a dose too. I've got a trick planned for that one--if I works, I'll add a picture here. What's neat about the Makita is I have this one new from the store: I think I can get before and after pictures of the inside by dropping an LED inside the drain port and holding my camera up to the hole for a picture of the back wall of the tank.

Finally, nobody has picked up on the fact that I did this to the buddy bottle on my R10 too, though that load of silica gel happens to be in a paper tube because I was concerned about silica dust there. That pack is there to keep the relative humidity down inside that tank too.
Title: Re: Desiccator Experiment Results…and what happened to my compressor
Post by: KnifeMaker on June 16, 2020, 12:13:40 AM
Wow! gotta wonder if a good powder coating inside would add any benefit.


Great job on the pic's!


Knife
Title: Re: Desiccator Experiment Results…and what happened to my compressor
Post by: Mole2017 on June 16, 2020, 02:48:50 AM
If there was an easy way to do it without getting stuff in the wrong places, I'd treat the new compressor with something.

Whatever gets done, it has to be complete. If you look carefully at the picture of the cutoff end with the powder coat, the lower edge of the coating is pealing up (about 5 o'clock position). While looking for videos or pictures of the insides of people's air tanks, I did find one showing an epoxy spray coat being applied through a 2" inspection port.

And just for kicks, here's a video reminding us to not buy used compressors without checking a few things first:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ElQH4FrhDvY (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ElQH4FrhDvY)
Title: Re: Desiccator Experiment Results…and what happened to my compressor
Post by: bear air on June 16, 2020, 03:02:43 AM
Funny I should see this I just put together a dry air intake system for my new HPA compressor today using one of the little benjamin dessicant kits for their hand pumps. Ran it tonight and there was a lot less moisture when I did a quick bleed off while running it. I also noticed it had literally turned a bunch of the beads green when I was done. I plan on changing them out every time I run the compressor for an extended period of time.
Title: Re: Desiccator Experiment Results…and what happened to my compressor
Post by: Doug Wall on June 16, 2020, 08:31:03 AM
"Finally, nobody has picked up on the fact that I did this to the buddy bottle on my R10 too, though that load of silica gel happens to be in a paper tube because I was concerned about silica dust there. That pack is there to keep the relative humidity down inside that tank too. "

I actually did catch that here, but I thought it was a separate bottle
"I have a small desiccant (about 7", around $30 on ebay) on the output of my Nomad II, that wouldn't be too bad on a boosted hand pump, that's a lot easier to check than pulling a tank valve off."
Title: Re: Desiccator Experiment Results…and what happened to my compressor
Post by: Doug Wall on June 16, 2020, 08:45:13 AM
Funny I should see this I just put together a dry air intake system for my new HPA compressor today using one of the little benjamin dessicant kits for their hand pumps. Ran it tonight and there was a lot less moisture when I did a quick bleed off while running it. I also noticed it had literally turned a bunch of the beads green when I was done. I plan on changing them out every time I run the compressor for an extended period of time.
The little tiny hand pump desiccant packs are pretty useless on the input of a compressor. The key to desiccants working well is to have the air in contact with the desiccant for a long enough to have the moisture absorb. With those little ones, on a compressor, the air doesn't stay in long enough. Since this is on an input, the desiccant doesn't have to be in a pressure vessel. To make it effective, you can easily make a much larger one (say a quart size), with DIY components.
Title: Re: Desiccator Experiment Results…and what happened to my compressor
Post by: bear air on June 16, 2020, 11:12:15 AM
Thanks for the tip. This filter might be rather small but it really did capture a fair amount of moisture and turned a portion of the orange beads to green. I could also tell a significant drop in the moisture level when I did a quick purge on the high side. I figure every little bit helps. I wonder how much better two of them ran into a Y connector and then into the compressor would do. I do have it packed tight and also it sits upside down so the water beads towards the top/smallest part.
Title: Re: Desiccator Experiment Results…and what happened to my compressor
Post by: AlanMcD on June 16, 2020, 01:45:56 PM
Those tanks from that compressor look pretty good - lots of life left in them prior to being cut up.  People always think any rust in these tanks is horrible, but it is inevitable, and as I indicated in an earlier post.  The usage / duty cycle pretty much guarantees that there will always be some amount of liquid water in these after the first use.

Very interesting to see, so thanks for that.  I understand your being concerned with the age of the compressor, and not knowing how it was used before you had it, so I understand why you decided to abandon it and get a new one - and then you might as well cut it open and take a look to see what you can learn.
Title: Re: Desiccator Experiment Results…and what happened to my compressor
Post by: Mole2017 on June 16, 2020, 02:30:11 PM
Those tanks from that compressor look pretty good - lots of life left in them prior to being cut up.  People always think any rust in these tanks is horrible, but it is inevitable, and as I indicated in an earlier post.  The usage / duty cycle pretty much guarantees that there will always be some amount of liquid water in these after the first use.

Very interesting to see, so thanks for that.  I understand your being concerned with the age of the compressor, and not knowing how it was used before you had it, so I understand why you decided to abandon it and get a new one - and then you might as well cut it open and take a look to see what you can learn.

Well, having the motor burn up was one foot in the grave for this setup. After I got into them I did think I probably could have kept them around as a portable air source, but then again, I have plenty of other tanks that could do the same job and hold more air than this pair could.
Title: Re: Desiccator Experiment Results…and what happened to my compressor
Post by: anti-squirrel on June 17, 2020, 07:48:28 AM
Fun read, this thread.  For a guy that dealt with HP Air his entire naval career on Submarines and fixing submarines, I got a few observations:

1: I prefer 2-stage compressors that use oil.  Oil-free makes me sad.  My air compressor is nearly 35 years old and the receiver is older than me
2: blow-downs of the receiver were daily PMs when I worked construction.  Still do them whenever I use the compressor
3: compressors were an item I fixed literally close to a thousand times while a service tech for Sears after my Navy experience.  I prefer oil versus oil-free compressors for a reason
4: dedicated HP compressors deserve dedicated drying; my 2 HP handpumps do not have any dessicant and do not need them since they are not pressurizing fast- internal inspection of air tubes proves this, plus 8 years of Navy experience.  Slow-fill means dry air.  HP air moving fast has to be super-duper-dry on subs for a reason.  Google "Thresher SSN-593" for more info
5: my new HP Compressor WILL get an "Improved by Peter" dessicant system; the "factory" moisture trap is effective but why gamble?

Dry air is wonderful.  It makes submariners get back to port and ensures pellets keep flying.  They're the only reasons I need :)
Title: Re: Desiccator Experiment Results…and what happened to my compressor
Post by: Mole2017 on June 18, 2020, 08:38:27 PM
As I get ready to put the Makita compressor into service, I tried my hand at removing the drain plug to get access to the interior of the tank. Fortunately, this unit is so new the threadlock they used was still sticky and it came out once I was able to get something on it to turn it.

I haven't settled on a packaging scheme for the new desiccant, but here is a composite picture of the interior of this tank:

(https://www.gatewaytoairguns.org/GTA/MGalleryItem.php?id=7381)

The interior is lit with a "cob" LED I hacked out of an battery powered LED "lighswitch" at Walmart. Smaller wires would be nice--they are contributing to the blur at the bottom. By "composite," I mean this shot is actually nine overlapping shots stitched together by software, which did a pretty good job, I think. I held my phone camera up to the hole and snapped a shot, adjusted the angle for another and kept going.

I am looking through the condensate drain. That is the tank outlet at the lower right of the picture, which is the same size fitting as the condensate drain (nom. 1/2"). In use that is above the mid-line of the tank. The brightly lit area is just about the "top" of the tank when this is set on its feet properly.

You can't help but notice that there are spots of rust already on the wall and near that outlet. I bought this unit, ran it once to hear what it sounded like, and carried downstairs. The next day, I experimented with setting the regulator and left it with no hose connected to it. By the next day the tank was empty.

Now in practice, I will "shut" the regulator too when I leave the compressor after filling the gun, but I was testing this one--I guess this regulator leaks too. The Campbell Hausfeld regulator leaked so bad sometimes I think I lost as much air or more than I managed to pump into the R10 each session. I even took it apart once to see if I could do something about it.

Anyway, a few days later, I opened the tank and with a flashlight examined the inside and noted small wet spots. They were still just wet then and so small they were nearly flat--like when you wipe something with a towel that doesn't quite get it dry. But here we are a few days later and they have all turned to rust. As you can see, there was not a lot of them from that one tank full.

But that gets me wondering: will the drops form--and rust--faster than the desiccant can keep up with them? I guess we'll have to check on the tank in after a few more fill and empty cycles in the course of filling the R10. But before I can do that, I have to come up with an easier way to "contain" the silica gel for easier recovery. A 7/16" hole isn't much to work with  :P
Title: Re: Desiccator Experiment Results…and what happened to my compressor
Post by: desertplinker on June 18, 2020, 11:51:01 PM
would anyone be able to comment on the climate you live in, as in humidity in your geographic area? I live in a part of Arizona where humidity is like 10% on average. I always thought that would mean my compressor would be dry? Is this true?
Title: Re: Desiccator Experiment Results…and what happened to my compressor
Post by: aPpYe on June 19, 2020, 01:45:56 AM
For what it's worth, I have restored desiccant beads many times by putting them in my oven for half an hour or so at its lowest setting of 175 ...

Also,  adsorbing moisture out of the air at one pressure does not mean that there isn't still moisture that will be wrung out into your gun when you hit the higher pressures.
Title: Re: Desiccator Experiment Results…and what happened to my compressor
Post by: Chris USA on June 19, 2020, 05:32:33 AM
I have a California Air compressor feeding a Shoebox 10. I have a Campbell Hausfield water separator between the compressor and Shoebox that I put desiccant beads in. Maybe 3/4-1 cup. I replaced them awhile back when they went from orange to green. I have 1 1/2hrs of run time on the beads now and they are still orange. Not sure how long they went last time.

On humidity,.. in Ohio,... 60-80% is not uncommon in the Summer. Indoors with AC,... 40%-ish is about the best. I fill inside with AC on (or heat if winter). I drain my low pressure compressor often. I have yet to ever get liquid moisture from the moisture filter.

As I recall,... I had a choice of 5 micron or 40 micron filter on the moisture separator. I chose the 5.

I have been inside the air tube on the Maximus and M-rod and both were clean as can be.

That's all I got. 
Title: Re: Desiccator Experiment Results…and what happened to my compressor
Post by: AlanMcD on June 19, 2020, 06:43:20 AM
David,

While I love the thoroughness of of your approach to this, you are really not going to get a head of the condensation - especially if you ever use this compressor for more than feeding your hand pump.  I would say just use them as designed and take good care of them.  Mine is a 15 gallon Craftsman oil-less compressor that gets a good amount of use, and it is 25 years old, rock solid, and still going strong.  I have had to replace a few drain plugs over the years due to use, but that has been it. Take care of them as intended (aka drain them proportionate to their use) and they last a good long time (assuming it is a good unit to start with).  I bet mine has had some amount of liquid water in it for all of those 25 years - it is unavoidable.

Steve,

Relative humidity is just that - relative.  A given mass of air that is pressurized air can hold less water vapor than the same mass of air at atmospheric pressure.  Even at the humidity level you are at, there is enough water vapor in the air that, once pressurized, some water will likely condense out into liquid.  You will just have less of it - so you will not need to drain your tanks near as often.  But the inside will still get wet over time.
Title: Re: Desiccator Experiment Results…and what happened to my compressor
Post by: Doug Wall on June 19, 2020, 08:39:07 AM
The only way that you will ever prevent water from condensing on the inside of the tank is by keeping the water from getting into the tank in the first place. In a compressor tank, the water will always condense on the tank surface. If you put some kind of desiccant cartridge in the tank, the water isn't attracted to it like a magnet. The water vapor diffuses through the air, and if a molecule happens to bump into the desiccant, it will absorb.

A large desiccant cartridge on the INPUT of the compressor will keep water (or most of it) from getting into the compressor.  By large, I'm talking about something about 3" diameter. and 2 ft long. By having the air flow through a desiccant bed for a longish period of time, the water molecules have a better chance of absorbing in the desiccant.
Title: Re: Desiccator Experiment Results…and what happened to my compressor
Post by: AlanMcD on June 19, 2020, 09:26:03 AM
Doug is right.  And I will add that, in my opinion, it simply is not worth drying air before feeding it into a compressor - they are made with the expectation that liquid water will condense out in them, and if properly cared for the "compressor" will wear out before the "tank" will rust through (and even if it does, in over 99% of the cases it will be in a manner that leads to a leak not an explosion).

I would dry the air coming out of the shop compressor that you feed into your hand pump - the shop compressor will have done 90% of the work for you, by condensing out a lot of the water vapor (provided you let the tank cool before using the air). A smaller "normal" desiccant filter will do the rest (unlike the massive one you need to feed a shop compressor)

This is what most of us Shoebox users do.  Here is a post I put up years ago with the data on absolute humidity of different stages of compression (written form a Shoebox user perspective, but still applicable to using a shop compressor to feed a hand pump).  There is an attached PDF with good data in it.  https://www.gatewaytoairguns.org/GTA/index.php?topic=139845.msg1407834#msg1407834 (https://www.gatewaytoairguns.org/GTA/index.php?topic=139845.msg1407834#msg1407834)
Title: Re: Desiccator Experiment Results…and what happened to my compressor
Post by: Mole2017 on June 20, 2020, 12:50:33 AM
Thanks for the input, Doug and Alan! It has been lurking my mind that I need to do some calculations about how much water my low use situation is dealing with. For example, how much air do I need to compress before I have a significant amount to drain? Is the first "tankful" of air going to just wet the inside surface, but not run down the sides and pool?

So, looking at Alan's attachment in his post he linked, let's see if I'm starting this correctly. First step, figure out how much air goes into the tank. In round numbers, suppose I fill to a gauge pressure of about 135 PSI or around 9 atmospheres. A 1st order approximation to relate the volume of air at tank pressure versus ambient pressure is to use

   V1*P1=V2*P2, or  V1/V2=P2/P1

That is, the ratio of the "free" air volume to the compressed volume is the same as the that of the two absolute pressures. In this case, P1 is just 1 atm and P2 is 10 atm (9 atm gauge plus that 1 atm above vacuum for 0 gauge pressure). Thus, my 2 gallons of 135 PSI air started out as 20 gallons of uncompressed air, or just about 0.075 cubic meters.

From Alan's table, then, hypothetical "worst case" saturated ambient air at 68 degrees F has 17.5 grams of water per cubic meter. My tank of 2 gallons of air at 135 PSI then could have as much as 1.3 grams of water.

Hmm, that was easy. That also isn't much. Even if I could get all of it to condense, we can all see from the pictures of the insides of the tanks, I'd be lucky to get a couple drops to blow out with the air. If I were using it on a big project and it cycled many times, I'd start getting enough water collecting to drain it at some point.

So in my experiment, I loaded dry silica gel into my compressor tank and used it infrequently over a year to fill my air rifle. That is, I ran it about every second or third time I needed to fill my air rifle. I actually don't shoot a lot, so I guessed at maybe having run the old compressor a dozen times over the year. That's about 16 grams total or just about 1 tablespoon of water (at the hypothetical ambient conditions).

The "used" silica was recovered, dried, and found to have been holding 23 grams of water at the time I dried it. However, even some of that 23 grams probably was adsorbed between the time I got it out of the compressor, sifted out the rust and started drying it. My notes from monitoring the "dry" silica exposed to room air afterwards indicate that it may have been able to adsorb as much as 2 to 5 grams in an hour from the air, so I'd guess it came out of the compressor with something less than 20 grams. Between what water may have still been in the tank and what got in there over the year, that seems about right. Neat.

Assuming I did the math correctly, it worked out ok for me. But if I was running that compressor every week, my silica gel would get swamped.

Picking up on that 0.075 cubic meters. My 200 cc buddy bottle at 220 atm is holding 0.044 cubic meters of air. If I've figured that correctly, that works out to two "less then full" buddy bottles for the R10 from a 2 gallon tank of air at 135 PSI. But, I'm not starting from empty each time either...filling 200 cc from 100 atm to 220 atm is just 0.025 cubic meters of air at 1 atm. So, if I haven't botched the numbers, that is about 3 refills from full tank of compressed air.

Title: Re: Desiccator Experiment Results…and what happened to my compressor
Post by: Chris USA on June 20, 2020, 06:25:51 AM
Years ago I worked at a radiator shop that did re-core ) replace unit, re-use tanks. They also did gas tank repairs that had small leaks. The gas would be drained. The interior was steam cleaned. Dried thoroughly.

Then,.... a plastic type liquid/epoxy? was poured in and the tank rolled around until the inside was coated. Any access was drained, let dry and that was it. As far as I know,.... it worked quite well. It was a red liquid and about the consistency of syrup.

If I were to line a new tank,.. or even an old one,... this would be the approach I would take.
Title: Re: Desiccator Experiment Results…and what happened to my compressor
Post by: Mole2017 on June 20, 2020, 10:26:37 AM
Funny that you should mention that. I had lining the tank on my mind too this morning.

First difficulty/inconvenience of lining this tank is that is has fittings on it already that use some really tough sealant/adhesive. The stuff is still fresh, so it may be now or never if I were to disconnect anything, but then again let's think about what has to be disconnected...Here's a view of the connections:

(https://www.gatewaytoairguns.org/GTA/MGalleryItem.php?id=7383)

From front to back:

If I were going to pour and swirl any coating in this tank, that third connection is the one I'd worry about fowling. But, maybe with care it could be done--just don't let it all slop into that port and don't get too careless with the other two for that matter. Or just man up and see about taking that part off.

That leaves what to use for a coating that I can get reasonably easily. Ideas:

Wax was what was on my mind this morning. It isn't going to cure before you finish. It wets easily once a surface is heated. Certainly the slowest application process too. But maybe someone has a suggestion? For the life expectancy of the system (oil-less compressor) maybe not worth the trouble either, but it seems too tempting not to consider it.
Title: Re: Desiccator Experiment Results…and what happened to my compressor
Post by: AlanMcD on June 20, 2020, 10:52:16 AM
David,

As one that also lived much of my life by the motto "if you think it ain't broke, you haven't looked hard enough," I commend your desire to make this compressor better.  But I have to ask:  just how many decades do you want this thing to last?

You bought a fine little compressor there that without doing anything other than draining the water out every several months (based on your stated duty cycle), probably will last you well over 20 years - and when it does finally fail, it almost certainly won't be due to the tank rusting out.

It does not need desiccant in it, and it does not need the insides sealed up.  The better use of that desiccant is on an output filter into your hand pump (or whatever you decide to feed with it).  And if you are worried about rust as a contaminant in your air feeding your pump, I would add a fine filter after your desiccant filter.  Personally use a 0.1 micron filter after my desiccant filter in the feed system into my Shoebox - and the desiccant filter is after probably 70 feet of plumbing and multiple water traps along the way, so it sees pressurized air at below 70 degrees F in my basement, so I have condensed out as much as possible before it does its job (it is large too, so I get over 150 hours of run time on my Sheobox before I have to recharge it).

All the while that 25 year old shop compressor does it's thing with condensed water (and probably some rust) sitting in the tank.  Mostly due to this thread, I did go ahead and drain it this morning - probably had a few cc's in it from use over the winter and this spring - and tapped around the tank with a wrench listening for changes in tone and heard none.  So it goes back to its duty, most likely until the compressor pump fails at some point and I'll get a new one.

Feel free to keep working to make yours better though - as I said, I get it.  I did lots of things like this when I was younger, and while I enjoyed doing them at the time, I never once got to see the anticipated functional benefit or economic payoff for doing it.  Just one last thing to consider: if you do this, and the compressor pump fails for some reason in 6 to 9 months, there is no way that Makita will honor any warranty on it . . .

Have fun!
Title: Re: Desiccator Experiment Results…and what happened to my compressor
Post by: Mole2017 on July 21, 2020, 02:27:16 PM
Well, it has been a while. Since I was already into things this far, I finished the job and got some wax in there. As Alan points out above, it really isn't needed. And I could put the desiccant in an inline unit instead. However, not having an inline unit available and not wanting to shop for that and its fittings, I've continued with the plan which has shown itself to be successful.

Again, don't forget that this is a compressor that isn't going to see much use. I am certain many of you run compressors bigger than this through more fill cycles in a day than I will in a year (easily less than a dozen, I estimated). That isn't much moisture in the first place--not even enough to drain. But the water vapor in the tank would nevertheless condense to the sides of the tank and rust given an occasion. And yes the motor or something else will fail before the tank does, but, well, it seemed like something to mess with. Like they say, so know you know...

Here's a view of the now blue tinted interior of my compressor tank:

(https://www.gatewaytoairguns.org/GTA/MGalleryItem.php?id=7424)

Those few spots of rust are from the moisture of a single filling to test the thing after I bought it. The big orange spot at the bottom is a blurry yellow wire that goes to the LED illuminating the inside of the tank. I can almost see both end welds on this tank from the drain port. This tank is about 7 or 8 inches in diameter and the two ports you see at each edge of the photo are about 12" or 14" apart in real life. This is a composite picture made from about a dozen shots through the port. I could have used a few more in the upper corners...

Anyway, as to how it was done, should you ever try to do the same or similar...
I found some dark blue wax on a pair of candles. Now, most candles are not solid colored all the way through. These had a just a layer of blue wax on the outside; the rest was just white wax. Fortunately, that last layer was from a single dipping on a cooler candle and didn't really fuse well. It was easily chipped off. Melting it in a tuna can confirmed it flowed well at around 170 degrees and froze up near about 140, as much as wax does such a thing. I had maybe a couple tablespoons; 1/8" or 3/16" deep in the can.

So how to heat a tank to get the wax to roll around nicely and wet everything? That I thought a while about and tried a few ideas. In the end, the solution was simple: put it in the back of the car on a sunny day. 150 degrees, piece of cake, and higher still if the sun is shining on it too. Even sitting in the sun in the driveway was enough to get it to 135 degrees. Then a quick play with the heat gun easily pushed it past 170 and I just tipped it and sloshed it, heating areas as needed to keep the wax moving and making sure my last steps were to coat the side with all the ports. By then the layer of moving wax was thin enough to not go over the inside lip of the ports.

So, let's see; over a month to pull this off? I haven't been very efficient, for sure. I've been tied up with other stuff and haven't been able to shoot much. Which is good in a way--the R10 is running on fumes now and there are finally some pests to take care of (it has been a quiet summer).  Furthermore, notwithstanding that the hottest part of the summer is nearly upon us, I've been getting an itch to go after the woodchucks again and needed to get things back together.

Eventually, I will get to the other part of this experiment: the desiccant pack that is inside the R10 buddy bottle. That is there to catch the little bit of moisture that gets through my scheme as it is now. Any day now, I'll have to take that bottle off to get the action out of the stock to get my hammer tension back in spec, and that might be a good time to have a look inside of things.

And a final note to DIY folks: don't disassemble that combination on/off pressure limit switch screwed to the side of the tank. Just disconnect the wires, strain reliefs included, and unscrew that thing if you are worried about it. (The thread sealant on this Makita is tough stuff and I had wanted to avoid messing with that, but had to do it anyway in the end in order to put it back together.) I had only wanted to get it out of the way to make sure I didn't accidentally get wax into it. It wasn't easy to get back together...You think that was foolhardy, wait to you see my next post...