GTA

All Springer/NP/PCP Air Gun Discussion General => PCP/CO2/HPA Air Gun Gates "The Darkside" => Topic started by: FuzzyGrub on January 29, 2020, 01:21:39 PM

Title: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: FuzzyGrub on January 29, 2020, 01:21:39 PM
It has been quite a while since I've done much with tuning these guns.  For the most part, mine are either regulated or tuned with an O-ring buffer.  Experimenting recently for my 2501P build, with the latter, had me coming back to the limitations of space within these guns.  I thought I'd post some of the info for other owners here.  I'll cover what options are available, from increasing difficulty, and side effects to consider. 

From a cocking perspective, the Prod, 1720T, and 1701P all share the same components.  Hammer, striker, spring, adjuster, and end cap.  All of these air tubes have the same dimensions in this area.   The Fortitude has the same air tube dimensions, but uses different components.   I'll discuss the stock components and limitations.

Hammer Travel: From sear latch to poppet contact, there is only 1/2" of travel.  That is with the throw adjustment at maximum (full CCW).   That compares to 0.9" of a Mrod, if memory serves.  This short distance in itself, is a significant limitation.  It complicates power mods, and efficiency mods such as SSG and dual spring configurations. 

Below, you will see a piece of a Prod tube, left over from a double tube build.  Along the hammer pin slot you will see two long indicator marks.  The rear most mark is the pin location at sear latch and the one ahead of it, the pin location on poppet contact.  You will also notice there is 3/8" from poppet contact to where the hammer pin would contact the end of the slot.   The poppet stem only extends out of the valve 1/4", so the pin will not contact the air tube.  The hammer will hit the back of the valve first.   That normally would never happen in normal use, except if shooting the gun down to zero psi. 

Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: FuzzyGrub on January 29, 2020, 01:49:56 PM
Hammer: 

Dimensions: 1.3" L X 0.738" Max OD

Spring Pocket: 0.488" Depth X 0.312" ID

Weight: The stock hammer weighs 54g and a total of 58g with the oem striker.  That compares to 73g (78g w/striker + hammer pin) of a Mrod hammer.  The Mrod hammer is considered "heavy" though. 

Throw Adjustment: Greater than the 1/2".  You could adjust it such that you would have no throw!  Not that has any real value.  ;) 

Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: FuzzyGrub on January 29, 2020, 02:54:17 PM
Hammer Spring and Adjuster:

The hammer spring is 0.312" OD X 1.5" L X 0.035" wire.  Please note that I believe newer guns, within the last 3 years, have a different spring.  I need to remove and check the one in my most recent purchase.   I believe the wire size was increased to 0.042", but same length.   I'll post an update when I have that.

Update: Current production stock spring: 0.282" OD X 1.85" L X 0.035" wire

Spring Adjuster:  The adjuster has 6.5 turns of adjustment from full CCW stop to falling out of the threads, for about 0.27" of travel.  The spring is under slight pre-load at the full CCW stop.  About 0.1" of preload.  So the total amount of preload is limited to 0.37".   In stock form, you can not adjust it for zero preload or negative (gap), which is done to prevent hammer bounce and improve efficiency. 

With current production spring, there is 0.43" of preload plus the 0.37" of adjustment for 0.60" of total preload available.
Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: AKM on January 29, 2020, 03:58:48 PM
What has more affect on de-tuning (less power) for indoor range use, turning the hammer spring CCW or turning the stroke CW?

Is one better then the other or should both be adjusted equally for lower power?
Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: Tonycalves on January 29, 2020, 04:30:41 PM
Fuzzy amount of tremendous info thanks Bro!
Got the brass tube you linked. It's a snug fit can't wait to affix it to the probe. Thanks

AKM Theres a few ways to do that. You can order a smaller TP from Crosman.  You can cut the length of the poppet a little.  Adding a B Staley oring mod.
Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: AKM on January 29, 2020, 04:39:24 PM
I asked because a friend has a 12yard indoor range and wants to shoot the P-rod.

I don't want to do anything permanent as this gun is used for pesting.

Guess I'll turn the hammer spring all the way out CCW, turn the stroke in CW and see what happens.

Thanks.
Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: JBinCO on January 29, 2020, 04:45:47 PM
Little off topic I guess.... where can you get hammer springs....I am looking for the Gauntlet (think it is the same as you have on picture but need to confirm that with some caliber work.   What I have has a kink and is hanging up or binding some (Haj put in with a JSAR super tune kit......I have a PM in to Haj but he is very busy and if I can get it on my own he can keep making videos for us!) after 5000 rounds or so
Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: FuzzyGrub on January 29, 2020, 05:03:25 PM
What has more affect on de-tuning (less power) for indoor range use, turning the hammer spring CCW or turning the stroke CW?

Is one better then the other or should both be adjusted equally for lower power?

You can think of the hammer spring as the course adjustment and throw as the fine.   In your case, you will be trying to move your shot string to a lower pressure, which also reduces the shot power.  Let’s say that your current shot string is centered on 2400 psi, try lowering it to around 2000.  If that doesn’t lower it enough, it may take extra measures, like was mentioned above.
Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: FuzzyGrub on January 29, 2020, 05:12:04 PM
Little off topic I guess.... where can you get hammer springs....I am looking for the Gauntlet (think it is the same as you have on picture but need to confirm that with some caliber work.   What I have has a kink and is hanging up or binding some (Haj put in with a JSAR super tune kit......I have a PM in to Haj but he is very busy and if I can get it on my own he can keep making videos for us!) after 5000 rounds or so

I don’t know Gauntlet spring dimensions or rate.  McMaster-Carr was my go to spring supply, but their selection has dwindled over the last few years.  There are many other online sources, and can have them custom made to your specs.  Lee springs is one you should check out.    Recently looking on Zoro.  They seem to have a decent selection in the range I want, but the layout makes it harder to find the specific one you want.   Prices look to be around $15 for 10 springs. 
Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: Hawkeye51 on January 29, 2020, 05:33:47 PM
Fuzzy

Timely post for me since I just got a bargan on a new P-rod. Looking at tunes, parts, springs etc. Thanks for posting the info. Amazon has a few choices in .042-.047 springs but I was unsure of the length needed for a tiny bit of free flight. I'm assuming a power adjuster would give me a little more fudge factor.

Anyone wanting to suggest tip, tricks and links, for P-rod tunes would be greatly appreciated by me.  I know it's all been done before & your experience would save me time & money. Looking for best power at about 3 mags. I have one set at max power, but limited shot count. I love the platform.
Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: FuzzyGrub on January 29, 2020, 06:04:52 PM
I am planning to cover the minor mods next.  Springs, RVA, and hammer travel.  I was not planning to cover specific tuning how-to here, outside of mentioning what may be beneficial or appropriate for conventional, BStaley (O-ring), SSG, Short stiff springs, type tuning.   My favorite for Prods, over the years, is still the BStaley.  Try doing a search on that, here and maybe on the marauder forum.  There was a whole guide that was written on it. 
Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: RDB on January 29, 2020, 07:10:34 PM
Which ones wear regulators, and how are they tuned?
Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: Blutroop on January 29, 2020, 07:35:56 PM
Watching.
Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: FuzzyGrub on January 29, 2020, 08:23:46 PM
Which ones wear regulators, and how are they tuned?

Using a regulator, usually means optimizing for a lower pressure.  A lighter hammer and spring change, SSG, dual springs, or SSS (short stiff spring) are candidates.  Working within the tight confines is the challenge. 

In my particular case, all three of my "long" tube rifles are regulated.  The 25 uses a zero preload spring, the 22 a twin spring set-up, and don't remember what is in the 177, but likely a MDS lighter hammer. 
Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: SILENT SQUIRREL on January 29, 2020, 09:51:44 PM
I am planning to cover the minor mods next.  Springs, RVA, and hammer travel.  I was not planning to cover specific tuning how-to here, outside of mentioning what may be beneficial or appropriate for conventional, BStaley (O-ring), SSG, Short stiff springs, type tuning.   My favorite for Prods, over the years, is still the BStaley.  Try doing a search on that, here and maybe on the marauder forum.  There was a whole guide that was written on it.

Following you John
It's good for the shot curve & the learning curve

Ed
Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: FuzzyGrub on January 30, 2020, 09:40:13 AM
There are a couple of ways to increase the hammer travel.  Not a big increase, but will provide some additional force on hammer impact. 

Shortening the valve poppet stem will provide some additional travel.   The stem extends out of the valve by a 1/4".  You need around 1/8" of travel for use, and would add some buffer.   If going this route, would only remove about 0.080" or close.   Crosman valve poppets are inexpensive, around $1.70, if you mess up.  You do need to grind a slight taper in the end to prevent mushrooming.  If it mushrooms and you try to remove it, can jam and/or damage the valve.  I would also recommend extending the hammer slot, the same amount as removed from poppet stem to prevent hammer pin from hitting the end.   I expect that modding the hammer slot, and requiring a de-gas to mod poppet, will keep most people away from this one.

The much more common way is to shorten the striker.  A 1/4"-28  set-screw in  3/8" - 1/2" length, with the head ground flat can do the job.  With set-screw set flush, you will gain 0.080" of travel.   If you recess the set-screw, you could get a little more.  Like the poppet stem mod, you need to be concerned about the hammer pin hitting the end of the slot.   In this case, there is an easier way to protect it.  Installing a single -113 O-ring, against the back of the valve, will prevent the pin contact and from the hammer contacting valve using dry fire degas method.  Many will have these size O-rings, as it the size used within the prod/1701/1720.   A -113 X-ring would hold in place better, and if using only as a bumper, 90D will last longer.

The set-screw striker, is not a complete free lunch.   Without the striker head, you do not have a positive stop to reference for tuning.  Using this, it generally becomes stationary.  That is not an issue for most tuning, as many airguns out there do not have a throw adjustment to begin with.  While it can be used with the BStaley O-ring buffer, it would only allow for two O-rings and you have to carefully track how many turns are on the set-screw.  I don't recommend it for tuning with that method.  You also lose 3g of weight by going to set-screw, but it is inconsequential. 

I will mention here, but discuss further in the thread, that some aftermarket and custom hammers allow for the striker to be recessed flat to the hammer.  That will provide 0.080" additional travel with a positive stop for the striker. 

Theoretically, you could do both mods to gain 0.160" of travel.  In which case, you definitely need to extend the hammer slot to prevent the pin from impacting.

Pictures:
1 - Poppet showing the bevel to prevent mushrooming
2 - OEM hammer, striker, and set-screw striker
3 - Set-screw striker installed flush
4 - Tube showing the 0.080" travel increase with set-screw striker



Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: TF89 on January 30, 2020, 11:35:52 AM
Thanks for the awesome details and the time you are putting into sharing this information.  It takes a lot of time to put this type of presentation together.
Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: moorepower on January 30, 2020, 11:57:23 AM
Fuzzy, you are the P master. The only things I can add, is that the Square Orings stay put much much better than the round ones. If I recall your using an Xring?? A word of caution to all of those that throw in a heavier spring, make sure the bolt is pulled all the way back, because if your not deliberate you WILL double load. I have a .045 spring in my Prod, if I remember and I am going down to a .042 to try to get easier cocking. "If" JSAR ever produces the balanced valve again, it might be worth getting one just for the reduced cocking effort. I need to tear in to the 1720 and tweak it a bit to get the shot count up. "If" I could only have two airguns the Prod would for sure be one of them. It's the only airgun I own that I will take the pump with me not the tank, if I am just hunting.
Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: SwampHunter on January 30, 2020, 12:02:49 PM
Following! I have a prod that was modified before I got it, so I didn't get the chance to go through the learning curve on them, lots of help here!
Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: FuzzyGrub on January 30, 2020, 01:07:09 PM
Thx, Guys.  Glad someone has found the info helpful.

Busy on other stuff, but hope to post about hammers by sometime tomorrow.   Followed by RVA's, and then springs to tie it all together. 

Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: cootertwo on January 30, 2020, 02:07:47 PM
Nice info there Fuzzy, thanks! ;)
Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: Lani52 on January 30, 2020, 03:05:33 PM
Great info Fuzzy.

Thanks,

Roachcreek
Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: FuzzyGrub on January 31, 2020, 11:28:04 AM
Hammers:

First a restating of the oem hammer specs:

- Dimensions: 1.3" L X 0.738" Max OD
- Spring Pocket: 0.488" Depth X 0.312" ID
- Weight: The stock hammer weighs 54g and a total of 58g with the oem striker.
- Throw Adjustment: Greater than the 1/2".  You could adjust it such that you would have no throw!  Not that has any real value.   

- Hammer pin: Drop in pin. 
- Throw tension:  Blind hole on the front of hammer.  A small acetal pin is dropped into the blind hole and the throw adjuster is threaded over it.  If you purchased a hammer from crosman parts, the pin is not included.  A small piece of weed trimmer line will suffice.  If fixing a "loose" throw adjuster, you need to pick the old pin out (patience), before inserting new.

Modifying the oem hammer can be a challenge given it is hardened steel.   While I haven't tried it yet, they can be heated to cherry red, then allowed to cool slowly, to soften the steel.  After machining/modding, heating to cherry red and a quick quench, to re-harden. 

If you are tuning with the BStaley O-ring buffer, keeping the throw from moving can be critical for a stable tune.  Small movements in throw can have significant impact on fps.  A common mod is to thread the front hole for a small set-screw.  A set-screw with small piece of weed eater line, becomes a much better way to keep it from moving.  The hole is 0.135" in diameter.  I believe it was a 4mm tap vs the slightly larger 8-32.  I'll have to research it to be sure.   I was able to tap it, without softening, but you have to go slow and use a new tap.  On the third hole with that tap, I snapped it off.   :-[   I was able to break pieces off flush, and still use the hammer.  Anyway, just be careful and go slow.

The other main mod to the oem hammer, is widening and deepening the spring pocket.  This allows for using longer and larger OD springs.  Also, allows room for using twin springs.  The one I have, is 0.435" ID X 0.8" depth.  You can use springs up to 0.420" OD, but also requires End cap and rva adjuster mods.  More on that latter.   The weight is 46g.

MDS hammers are available for the Prod/1720/1701, but currently think only via custom order.  The one shown below has a brass core, striker flush recess, and the larger spring pocket.  Weight is 29g. 

Pictures:
- Left to right: OEM Hammer, Modified OEM Hammer, MDS Hammer

 
Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: FuzzyGrub on January 31, 2020, 12:20:58 PM
Hammer Binding:

When going to heavier springs, the effort to cock the gun increases.  What also occurs, the cocking point is at the bolt lug/hammer pin contact point.  Because of this the hammer tries to tilt within the air tube.   The back edge of the hammer "digs" into the air tube.   If you look at used oem hammer, you will see a prominent wear made from the sear, but also at the bottom back edge.   This can get severe, and start damaging the tube.  Honing and smoothing out the air tube can help.  MDS hammers don't dig in.   I have also heard of some thin, stick-on "wear" pads.  I haven't used them, but if others can point me to them, might give them a try.  They could be placed on the back edge, off of the centerline, to stay clear of sear, and maybe on the front top, to minimize tilt. 

This hammer binding can also get worse, if using a breech riser, because it raises the bolt lug/hammer pin contact point.  I have used it in the past, with the longer challenger hammer pin.   Sometimes, you can make the lug a little longer, to lower the point, and this is what crosman did with the slightly higher Fortitude breech.  Doing that with the Prod/1701/1720 may require some relief in the cocking lug channel, to fit the longer lug. 
Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: moorepower on January 31, 2020, 12:36:43 PM
Good info there on the larger spring! I use a carbide drill bit to drill out Disco hammers on my lathe to make a captured SSG/FFH, so I am sure it would work on Prod hammer, with no heating.
Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: FuzzyGrub on February 01, 2020, 09:43:49 AM
OEM Adjuster:

The OEM adjuster rides on 3/8-24 threads and from min to max has an adjustment range of 0.265".   About 0.04" per turn.  It provides a positive stop against the back of the cap, where the smaller diameter degas threads are, which are 5/16-24.  The spring guide is 0.2" OD X 9/16", with an ID of 0.155". 

Pictures:
- OEM Endcap and Adjuster
- Adjuster at Maximum Compression
- Adjuster at Maximum Retraction
Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: FuzzyGrub on February 01, 2020, 09:59:20 AM
For those that have AR type stocks mounted on your prod/1701/1720 you are very limited to making changes to the end cap or adjuster.  The AR stock adapters typically screw in to the degas threads of the end cap, so it can not be modified or used by other hardware.  I know that is a good many of you, and I have two myself.  JSAR made a 1 piece adapter that replaced the whole end cap, which fixed the most common problem with the AR stock adapters, the bolt coming loose.  I don't own one, so will not be able to comment on how easy or hard it would be to modify. 

Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: SILENT SQUIRREL on February 01, 2020, 10:35:29 AM
For those that have AR type stocks mounted on your prod/1701/1720 you are very limited to making changes to the end cap or adjuster.  The AR stock adapters typically screw in to the degas threads of the end cap, so it can not be modified or used by other hardware.  I know that is a good many of you, and I have two myself.  JSAR made a 1 piece adapter that replaced the whole end cap, which fixed the most common problem with the AR stock adapters, the bolt coming loose.  I don't own one, so will not be able to comment on how easy or hard it would be to modify.

Is it a safe assumption, as much a it's a PITA, that one could remove the AR stock from the degas thread, make adjustments; & then restore the stock?

Soakin' the info up  like a sponge!

Thanks
Ed



Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: FuzzyGrub on February 01, 2020, 10:42:46 AM
About four year ago, Bob (rsterne) led one of the most collaborative efforts I have ever seen on an airgun forum.  Design and development of the SSG : https://www.gatewaytoairguns.org/GTA/index.php?topic=102095.0 (https://www.gatewaytoairguns.org/GTA/index.php?topic=102095.0)   It was just amazing to see so many people come together, brainstorm, and implement so many different solutions.  :)   I haven't seen anything that even begins to eclipse that, since. 

Back then, I looked to make one for prod/1720T:  https://www.gatewaytoairguns.org/GTA/index.php?topic=103054.msg983994;topicseen#msg983994 (https://www.gatewaytoairguns.org/GTA/index.php?topic=103054.msg983994;topicseen#msg983994)  where I used the adjuster from the Crosman Challenger.   

That adjuster threads into the degas threads in the endcap, and provides a much larger range of adjustment.   Actually more range than any typical spring will have available.   It is a non-destructive change.   If you still want to use the degas tool, it can be removed, degassed and re-installed. 

More to come on this:

On the challenger adjuster, you get 3/8" of additional space in the back of the adjuster.  That allows for longer springs.  The springs should be 0.3" OD such that they don't rub against the threads.  It also can compress further than the oem adjuster.  About 1/8" of additional compression, if your spring is capable. 

Another interesting thing with the challenger adjuster is that it has internal threads.  The 10-32 threads allow for the possibility of a twin spring, albeit limited selection of springs that can fit with the 0.3 OD ones.  But, there is a number of 0.187" OD ones to look at.  If you are making an external SSG with this, those threads need to be drilled out.


Pictures:
- Challenger Adjuster installed w/jam nut
- Maximum Retraction
- Maximum Compression
- With 10-32 bolt screwed in
Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: FuzzyGrub on February 01, 2020, 10:47:05 AM
For those that have AR type stocks mounted on your prod/1701/1720 you are very limited to making changes to the end cap or adjuster.  The AR stock adapters typically screw in to the degas threads of the end cap, so it can not be modified or used by other hardware.  I know that is a good many of you, and I have two myself.  JSAR made a 1 piece adapter that replaced the whole end cap, which fixed the most common problem with the AR stock adapters, the bolt coming loose.  I don't own one, so will not be able to comment on how easy or hard it would be to modify.

Is it a safe assumption, as much a it's a PITA, that one could remove the AR stock from the degas thread, make adjustments; & then restore the stock?

Soakin' the info up  like a sponge!

Thanks
Ed

Yes, that is how it is done if you have one of those stock adapters.  Back when I was actively tuning mine, I just reinstalled the crosman skeleton stock, and when complete, reinstalled the AR stock and adapter. 
Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: SILENT SQUIRREL on February 01, 2020, 12:03:19 PM
For those that have AR type stocks mounted on your prod/1701/1720 you are very limited to making changes to the end cap or adjuster.  The AR stock adapters typically screw in to the degas threads of the end cap, so it can not be modified or used by other hardware.  I know that is a good many of you, and I have two myself.  JSAR made a 1 piece adapter that replaced the whole end cap, which fixed the most common problem with the AR stock adapters, the bolt coming loose.  I don't own one, so will not be able to comment on how easy or hard it would be to modify.

Is it a safe assumption, as much a it's a PITA, that one could remove the AR stock from the degas thread, make adjustments; & then restore the stock?

Soakin' the info up  like a sponge!

Thanks
Ed

Yes, that is how it is done if you have one of those stock adapters.  Back when I was actively tuning mine, I just reinstalled the crosman skeleton stock, and when complete, reinstalled the AR stock and adapter.
Thanks
Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: FuzzyGrub on February 01, 2020, 01:02:29 PM
While the challenger adjuster allows for allot of adjustment, some will not like having the additional hardware extending out the back.  You can get close to the adjustment range by modifying the end cap.  It is a permanent change, but one of the main reasons I like modifying crosman guns, is the easy availability of parts at a reasonable cost. 

To get the additional adjustment, need to drill out the degasser threads and tap the threads out the back to the larger diameter oem adjuster.   You will gain about the same as the challenger for maximum extension, and able to use longer springs.  There is no additional compressive adjustment, though.  One advantage of this mod, using 0.3" OD springs, they can be changed without gun dis-assembly.  You might need a pick to pull them through the threads though.

The correct drill for aluminum is a "Q" size drill, for a 3/8-24 tap.  Once drilled out, tap from the inside to align with the existing threads.  The key is to hold the end cap securely without messing up the finish.  Not hard for the drilling, but more of a challenge with the tapping part.  I ran some short SHCS into the two 4-40 and one 8-32 holes.  I then used a bench drill vise, clamping on the SHCS heads.   Use a good tap, and back up often to clear chips. 

The oem adjuster does not have internal threads like the challenger adjuster.  It does look like it may have enough material to be drilled and taped for 10-32.  ie to try to do a version of twin springs. 
Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: FuzzyGrub on February 01, 2020, 02:08:07 PM
To use larger than 0.3” OD springs, will require a larger OD adjuster.  The largest possible is the ½-20, which is the same as the Mrod adjuster.  This will allow for springs upto 0.42” OD.   In this case you want to drill and tap from the outside in.  Use a 29/64” drill for ½-20 threads.  Do not drill all the way through the end cap.  Stop 5/16” from the bottom.  This is the part that inserts into the air tube.  We don’t want to break into the 4-40 breech screw holes and have enough threads for the trigger assy screw.   This section should be back drilled with a 7/16” drill.   For the ½-20 threads, will need a normal tapered tap, followed by a bottoming tap.  The trigger assy screw will just need a thin washer.
 
The Mrod adjuster spring guide will need to be turned down from 3/8” OD to about 0.30” to 0.305” for common 0.42” OD springs.  It can also be threaded on the inside for an inner adjuster for doing a twin spring.  In the pictures below you will see one that has been threaded for ¼” -28, and using a hammer striker. 

Another option is drilling and tapping for 7/16 – 20, and making your own adjuster from a set-screw.  Like the hammer, it may require getting it red hot and slow cooling to soften the set-screw for drilling and taping.  In this case, no need to re-harden it. 

Pictures:
- Modified Mrod End Cap, Mrod Adj, and Modified Prod End cap
- Modified prod End cap w/adj and 1/2 and 3/8 set-screws
- Modified Prod End cap with jam nut

Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: FuzzyGrub on February 01, 2020, 02:35:27 PM
Twin Springs:

You have heard me mention “Twin Springs” a number of times.  Twin springs discussion came out on GTA right after SSGs.  Travis drove allot of development in this solution, and like Bob, shared allot of that here.  Another good GTA collaborative effort.   What I found with twin springs, you could use a heavy spring adjusted with a gap and a lighter spring in preload, to get good efficiency, like the SSG, but had less erratic Es. Some of that erratic Es in SSG’s was admittedly component and fitment driven.  Twin springs, were easier to tune for me.  They also could be configured for higher loads.  Two springs working in parallel, the forces are additive.

Travis also has developed both Prod and Mrod versions of the Twin Spring set-up.   I don’t believe the Prod one is available anymore, though.  While I have some of these, I did not go take apart those guns to study or copy.  I believe these adjuster mods are different, and probably not as good or refined as his designs.   It is mainly to spark ideas for other DIYers, vs trying to copy any production solution.   

Next up, within a couple of days. is figuring out spring selection, starting with single springs.  Connecting the hammers and adjusters together.  :)
Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: Blutroop on February 02, 2020, 12:51:14 AM
Hey John, I really like the platform but have been looking for ways to improve. I’m thinking about doing my own aluminum air tube.
If you could design in a little more length would you give more room for hammer travel, spring, or both? With hammer travel only being 1/2” seems like 1/4 or another 1/2 could make a big difference?
Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: Buldawg76 on February 02, 2020, 01:24:23 AM
Subscribed as well.
Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: FuzzyGrub on February 02, 2020, 09:13:54 AM
Hey John, I really like the platform but have been looking for ways to improve. I’m thinking about doing my own aluminum air tube.
If you could design in a little more length would you give more room for hammer travel, spring, or both? With hammer travel only being 1/2” seems like 1/4 or another 1/2 could make a big difference?

While I think there would be improvement for power tunes by adding 1/4" from sear latch to poppet impact, the amount of other mods that would have to change will start questioning "Is it worth it?".   I'll leave all the material change questions aside, and assume it is the same steel tube.  The first thing that jumps out at me is moving the front trigger assy screw back that 1/4 -1/2" and a custom breech to handle the longer cocking effort.  I think it will snowball from there and almost everything will change. 
Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: TF89 on February 02, 2020, 06:38:25 PM
The twin spring is a great idea. The hard part is getting reverse springs so the two don't bind and get tangle during use.  I really wanted to try that idea in both my disco and p-rod.  Ended up using the x-ring bstaley  tune, which works, just thinking the springs would be a better for lo,g term use.
Title: Re: Revisiting Prod/1701P/1720T Hammer, Springs, and Adjustment
Post by: FuzzyGrub on February 03, 2020, 09:25:19 AM
The twin spring is a great idea. The hard part is getting reverse springs so the two don't bind and get tangle during use.  I really wanted to try that idea in both my disco and p-rod.  Ended up using the x-ring bstaley  tune, which works, just thinking the springs would be a better for lo,g term use.

You are correct, finding springs that are left and right wound is hard.  Most places don't indicate winding direction at all.   I have not had any intertwining issues when using springs wound in the same direction.  I believe it is because the spacing of the coils is different between them.