GTA

All Springer/NP/PCP Air Gun Discussion General => PCP/CO2/HPA Air Gun Gates "The Darkside" => Topic started by: Joe Brancato on March 22, 2016, 11:36:31 AM

Title: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: Joe Brancato on March 22, 2016, 11:36:31 AM
My experience and test results with an SSG, and FFH Hammer De-Bouncing Devices (HDD) on a Stock Marauder.

By Joe Brancato 714-907-0067
Please give credit to the work of the author if you choose to re-distribute.

I would like to give credit to my helper Ricky who assisted me in the testing, as well as Ron (Tri-5-Ron).   Without Ron's help and loan of his Chronograph I could not have completed this task


There has been a lot of talk recently about de-bouncing the hammer on a Marauder (and other PCP Airguns) to increase shot efficiency and/or increase power.  At past shooting events, and recently with a customer’s Marauder, instead of a nice clean “bing” or sharp “pop” report, I have heard the tell-tale “Bbraaaattt”.   This “Bbraaaattt” report is a sign of hammer-bounce, where the hammer continues to strike and re-strike the valve, (after it initially strikes the valve to propel the pellet).   Any strike to the hammer after the initial strike is a waste of air. This wasted air could have been used to either increase shot count, increase pellet velocity, or a combination of both.
What does one do to prevent or reduce hammer bounce?   I tested 2 HDD devices, quite different in design, appearance and installation, and offer the un-biased test results to you. 
Note that both, regulated, and non-regulated PCP airguns with hammer bounce will benefit from an HDD, but this particular example is with a stock un-regulated, Marauder.   I then installed each HDD device, without any other modification to the rifle. No tuning for that specific HDD was made, as the idea was to see how a “drop-in” HDD performed.

Mini-lesson on self-regulating rifles:
Most un-regulated PCP Airguns have what is called a “Sweet Spot”.  This is the pressure range at which an individual PCP Airgun shoots a pellet somewhat consistently at relatively the same velocity, even though the pressure is decreasing with each shot. This is called self-regulating (as opposed to a “Regulated PCP Airgun” that has an actual regulator installed into it). 
One needs a proper amount of air to consistently shoot a pellet at a satisfactory speed. The proper pressure to fill will be defined as the “Fill-To Pressure”.  Obviously too little air pressure will result in a slower than intended pellet.    BUT, too much air pressure will also make an un-regulated PCP Airgun shoot slower.  This may seem counter-intuitive, but it is true.  If filled higher than the “Fill-To Pressure”, the increased force on the valve (resulting from the higher pressure exerted on the valve from the airtube) will close the valve quicker, resulting in less air for propulsion and a SLOWER pellet.  Each resulting shot will slightly speed up.   Eventually the pellet hits a peak velocity at a particular pressure, and each subsequent shot results in a slightly slower pellet as the pressure continues to decrease.  Eventually the pellet is so slow, the airgun needs to be refilled. Many airguns tend to be refilled at around 2000 PSI, but others can vary dramatically.  I define this as the “Re-Fill At pressure”.  The range of pressure between when one starts to fill the PCP Airgun (Re-Fill At Pressure) to when one stops filling (Fill-To Pressure) is called the “Sweet Spot”.
One example is of my un-regulated Air Arms S310 shown in Chart 1.
 
(http://www.airtanksforsale.com/HDD/clip_image001.gif)
Chart 1
Sample Shot String for AA S310 w/16 Grn JSB
Chart 1 shows that if one wanted to shoot within 20 F/S of the peak velocity, shots #2-#30 would fit this criterion.  Looking to the 4th column from the left, one can see the “Sweet Spot” for shots #2-#30 would range from 198-144 BAR = about 2900 PSI “Fill-To” and “Re-Fill At” of 2100 PSI.  If one doesn’t have a rifle equipped with a gauge, they would simply fill to 2900, and count 29 shots (yes, 29, not 28)*
 
My Testing Method:
[/b]
1) I first tested the stock Marauder with my helper, Ricky. I connected my Great White Tank to the Marauder, and I intentionally over-filed the Marauder to 3200 PSI, so that it would definitely be above the “Fill-To” pressure.  This ensured we got all the preliminary data prior to entering the “Sweet Spot”.  If I had tested at an initially lower pressure, we could have already been in the sweet spot and lost critical data.  (Note: this was for testing purposes. NEVER over-fill ANY PCP Airgun). 
2) We closed the valve at 3200 PSI on the Great White tank, but DID NOT BLEED the valve and hose.  This would allow the check valve in the Marauder to remain open and the Main Gauge on the Great White would indicate the pressure in the Marauder.  We used the Great White Gauge instead of the Marauder’s for 2 reasons. A) the gauge on the Marauders are often off by 500 PSI, vs. the 1% accuracy for the Wika gauge on my Great White tank and 2) the Marauder gauge is too tiny and doesn’t have the hash-marks to interpolate the minute pressure differences .  Even with a large 2.5” gauge on the Great White, we were splitting hairs and it was difficult to interpolate some pressures. 

(http://www.airtanksforsale.com/HDD/clip_image003.jpg)
Photo 1 - Wika 2.5” Gauge, 1% Accuracy

3) Rick and I would measure the pressure prior to each shot, and then enter the velocity from the Chrony. If we missed a shot, we’d re-fill all over again. This got old fast, but we did it.  F/S was measured to 0.1 F/S.  Chart 2 shows the stock Marauder’s shot string with a JSB 25.4 grain pellet. 


Parameters for judging shot efficiency
When judging shot count efficiency, all three measurements, a) “Fill-To” and “Re-Fill At” pressures, b) Velocity/energy for a given pellet and c) Shot Count, need to be viewed as a system to evaluate the stock Marauder with HDD, vs. the stock Marauder without.  While obviously one wants to a) increase the number of shots, as well as possibly b) increasing the Energy per shot, one also wants to c) lower the “Fill-To” pressure and d) reduce the difference between the “Fill-To” and “Re-Fill At” pressures.  Accomplishing c) and d) results in a more air efficient PCP airgun, hence less “topping off” with an air tank would be necessary.


(http://www.airtanksforsale.com/HDD/clip_image004.png)
 
(Chart 2)
http://www.airtanksforsale.com/HDD/StockMrod.txt (http://www.airtanksforsale.com/HDD/StockMrod.txt)
(Click link above for Chart 2 – Excel Data for shot string of stock Marauder with a JSB 25.4 grain pellet)

1) Number of Shots per Fill:  a total of 22 shots (#4-#25) met our criterion of being within 20 F/S of the peak (From 795 F/S down to about 773-774 F/S).
2) Velocity:  V-Peak was 795 F/S.  Energy (795 F/S) =  35.7 FPE
3) Fill Pressure:  For this particular un-modified Marauder PCP Air Rifle we measured the “Fill-To” pressure to be 3100 PSI and the “Re-Fill At” pressure at 2130 PSI.  This is a difference of 930 PSI of air used. The unusually high fill pressure (many work best between 2900-3000 PSI) may be attributed to the       hammer bouncing. This requirement will also decrease the number of fills from a Great White from the “normal” 62.9 to 61.6.  Later, we will compare this number of fills to the Marauder with each HDD installed.
3) Report:  For this particular un-modified Marauder PCP Air Rifle we measured the highly technical JoeB Ear-o-meter. Basically everyone in the shop could hear the tell-tale “Bbraaaattt” in the Marauder’s report, signaling it had massive hammer bounce (as many do).
4) Shots per tank: 61.6 Fills x 22 Shots = 1,355 total shots per Great White with for this particular stock Marauder.
Conclusion for Stock Marauder:  As with most Marauders, it got about 20 shots (22 to be exact) that I consider usable and the hammer bounce was causing the airgun to use more air and at a higher pressure than anticipated.  This higher fill pressure reduced the total number of possible fills.

SSG, FFH, they’re all HDD!
I will briefly describe each HDD, its parts, and installation.

SSG
On the left is the unmodified End-Cap, spring and hammer.   The SSG kit (on the right) contains all the pieces below (From top on the right: Modified End-Cap, Guide Rod, new Spring, Modified Hammer etc.).     I opted for the modified hammer, instead of modifying my own. I was quite impressed with the quality of the components.  Installation was straightforward.  The SSG was installed without changing any pre-set spring tension, etc.. The energy for each shot can be adjusted by a locknut on the Guide Rod, varying the distance between the guide and the screw in the End-Cap.  The SSG is available for Gen I & Gen II Marauders.
 

(http://www.airtanksforsale.com/HDD/clip_image006.jpg)
Photo 2 - SSG

Chart 3 shows the results using the SSG.  This time Ron was my helper.  Similar to the un-modified Marauder, we hooked up the Great White tank and didn’t bleed it so we could monitor the pressure before each shot.   I’d shoot and Ron would enter the data on the Excel spreadsheet.  We were both amazed at how little the air pressure dropped in between shots (resulting in more shots). 


 
(http://www.airtanksforsale.com/HDD/clip_image007.png)
(Chart 3)
http://www.airtanksforsale.com/SSG.txt (http://www.airtanksforsale.com/SSG.txt)
(Click link above for Chart 3 – Excel Data for shot string of Marauder with SSG, w/JSB 25.4 grain pellet)


Results: Remember, all three measurements, Fill pressure, Velocity (F/S for a given pellet or energy) and shot count, need to be viewed as a system to evaluate the stock Marauder with SSG, vs. the stock Marauder without.
1) Number of Shots per Fill:  a total of 34 shots (#30-#63) met our criterion of being within 20 F/S of the peak (From 815 F/S down to about 795-794 F/S). This was a 54% increase in usable shots from stock.
2) Velocity:  V-Peak was 815 F/S = 37.5 FPE with SSG vs 795 F/s and 35.7 FPE without. This too could have been greatly improved, but we wanted to start with a completely un-modified SSG (i.e. we didn’t tweak it at all). Subsequent to these tests, we may re-install it and re-test to a higher velocity and see how  increasing the velocity affects the number of shots and Fill Pressures.
3) Fill Pressure:  We measured the “Fill-To” pressure to be 2685 PSI and the “Re-Fill At” pressure at 1915 PSI.  This is a difference of only 670 PSI of air used vs. 930 PSI for the un-modified!  This is a very dramatic improvement.  Using the fill calculator on my website this means that one would get 98.8 fills with the SSG installed vs 61.6 in our test gun. (a 60.3% increase in fills!)
4) Shots per tank: 98.8 Fills x 34 Shots = 3,359 total shots per Great White with SSG installed AND a modest bump up in FPE! This is an amazing improvement 2.48 times the number of shots per Great White vs. the stock Marauder!


Conclusion for SSG: The SSG was a SIGNIFICANT improvement!  Remember, all three variables need to be viewed as a whole and the shot count went up to 34 shots with the SSG installed, versus 22 shots uninstalled. This is a 54.5% % improvement while ALSO increasing the maximum Energy to 37.5 FPE with the HDD installed, vs. not. And lastly, (and just as important if you are concerned about the number of tank fills one will get) the “Fill-To” pressure decreased to just under 2685 PSI, while the “Re-Fill At” pressure was only 1915 (a difference of 970 PSI).  Using these numbers, one can see that the number of fills increased to 98.8 vs the stock 61.6!  I had to do a double take on that calculation!  Yes, installing the SSG resulted in a 60% increase in the number of usable fills one would get from a Great White (or any) 4500PSI air tank.  Coupling the 60% increase in number of fills with a 54% increase in shot count provides a total of 2.48 (let’s call it 2.5) times more shots from this Marauder from a 4500 PSI Tank!  That is GREAT NEWS for everyone, especially those that drive long distances to get their tanks filled..


FFH
The FFH is a very simple item.  The package contains all the pieces below, and not all the pieces are used.  It was the lack of parts that made me wonder how it would work.   Installation was doable. It took me a couple of tries to get all the parts properly put together, but once one I had done it, it would be simple to do a second time.  The FFH is installed using the stock spring that came with the Marauder.  The energy for each shot can be adjusted by a locknut on the end-cap, varying the distance between the stock plug in the end-cap, and the new screw. No tear-down is required to change velocity.
Note: I did a mistake, that may have made the data erratic, and that I used some lube on the hammer (thinking it would help). I’m wondering if the lube caused “stiction”, and made the data a bit “choppy”.
 

(http://www.airtanksforsale.com/HDD/clip_image009.jpg)
Photo 3 – FFH

Chart 4 shows the results using the FFH.  I had to do this alone over the weekend instead of the weekday, due to workload.  Similar to the un-modified Marauder, I hooked up the Great White tank and didn’t bleed it so I could monitor the pressure before each shot.  My first observation that even despite using the same hammer spring, the velocity (and hence FPE) went up dramatically with the FFH vs Stock. 




(http://www.airtanksforsale.com/HDD/clip_image010.png)
(Chart 4)
http://www.airtanksforsale.com/HDD/FFH.txt (http://www.airtanksforsale.com/HDD/FFH.txt)
Chart 4 - Shot string of stock Marauder with FFH, and JSB 25.4 grain pellet.
(Click link above for text values in Excel)


Results: Remember, all three measurements, Fill pressure, Velocity (F/S for a given pellet or energy) and shot count, need to be viewed as a system to evaluate the stock Marauder with FFH, vs. the stock Marauder without.
1) Number of Shots per Fill: a total of 32 shots (#1-#32) closely, but not exactly met our criterion of being within 20 F/S of the peak (From 852 F/S down to about 826-828 F/S). This was almost a 45% increase in usable shots vs. stock with a significant increase in power.
IMPORTANT NOTE: As per my EXACT specification of being within 20 F/S of Vax (854 F/S), only shots #3-24 fit this criterion, yielding only 22 shots. But to be a fair, that in my opinion, the data was so close, and so sporadic, one could have used 10 extra shots not exactly meeting my criterion. Whereas the stock Marauder (and SSG installed) Marauder tests dropped like a stone on either side of the shots that were 20 F/S slower than Vmax, (signaling the edge of the “Sweet Spot”) the FFH modified Marauder was still pretty flat outside for a number of  shots. To me, this indicated it was still in the “Sweet Spot” for these extra “Graced” shots.   In fact, it is my opinion that the Fill-to pressure of 3200 PSI quite in or near the beginning of the “Sweet Spot” and additional data (and possibly good shots) are missing.  In the attempt to publish the review before I get inundated with work, I will publish the data (in all its entirety for all to see), and at a later date attempt to re-do a data string for the FFH starting at 3350 PSI.
2) Velocity & Energy: V-Peak was 854 F/S = 41.1 FPE with FFH vs 795 F/s and 35.7 FPE without.  This is a 15% increase in FPE with stock spring.   The power can be easily changed up or down to suit one’s need without disassembling the Marauder. 
2) Fill Pressure:  We measured the “Fill-To” pressure to be at least 3200 PSI and the “Re-Fill At” pressure at 2135 PSI (if we use the data for 33 shots).  This is a difference of 1065 PSI of air used vs. 930 PSI for the un-modified. 
3) Report:  Everyone in the shop agreed the report was MUCH quieter than stock.  In addition, no longer could one hear any sign of the tell-tale “Bbraaaattt”.  It may have been a TINY bit louder than the SSG modified Marauder, but this could probably be attributed to the increased FPE. 
4) Shots per tank: 61.6 Fills x 32 Shots = 1971 total shots per Great White with FFH installed (an increase of 45%) vs. with without.  And that increased shot count is with a VERY significant power increase.


Conclusion for FFH: The FFH was a MAJOR improvement over the stock Marauder. Remember, all three variables need to be viewed as a whole.  The shot count went up to 32 shots with the SSG installed, versus 22 shots uninstalled (45% improvement) while ALSO SIGNIFICANTLY increasing the maximum Energy to 41.1 FPE with the FFH installed vs. 35.7 FPE. not (another improvement of 15%).     And lastly, the “Fill-To” pressure increased to 3200 PSI, while the “Re-Fill At” pressure remained the same at about 2135 PSI (a difference of 1065 PSI).  Using these numbers, one can see that the number of fills one could get from a Great White went to 51.2 vs the stock 61.6, while the number of shots increased 45%. 


Overall Conclusion: 
1.   The SSG and FFH each performed remarkably well
2.   As a former Physicist, I could turn this into a real science experiment. For an “Apples to Apples” comparison, the overall test could be better performed by either decreasing the velocity with the FFH to match that of the SSG, or the SSG increased to match that of the FFH.  I don’t think this is totally necessary (but it would be nice to do) because of point 3)
3.   It is my opinion that both devices removed the hammer bounce (probably completely).  With that accomplished, the only difference in the tests is that they were performed with different hammer springs set to different energy levels.  Both devices are exceptional in their results and hence perform their task.

(http://www.airtanksforsale.com/HDD/JoeData.GIF)
Chart 5 - Comparison of Maruder with SSG, with FFH vs. stock

Should you have any questions, or wish to purchase one, have an HDD installed, or purchase a Marauder with one installed, please call one of the following:
http://www.airtanksforsale.com/ (http://www.airtanksforsale.com/)  at 714-907-007

http://experthpa.com/cart/cart.php?m=product_list&c=69 (http://experthpa.com/cart/cart.php?m=product_list&c=69) Purchase online

http://www.topgun-airguns.com/ (http://www.topgun-airguns.com/)  at 602-674-5309
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: rsterne on March 22, 2016, 12:14:36 PM
I agree with your comments that it would be nice to compare the three setups adjusted to at least work over the same pressure range.... The SSG was starting over 400 psi below the stock MRod string, and over 500 psi below the FFH.... A calculation of the total FPE of each shot string vs. the air used (ie the efficiency) would also be useful.... Otherwise, great test, thanks for putting in the effort, Joe....

Bob
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: Joe Brancato on March 22, 2016, 12:48:29 PM
I agree with your comments that it would be nice to compare the three setups adjusted to at least work over the same pressure range.... The SSG was starting over 400 psi below the stock MRod string, and over 500 psi below the FFH.... A calculation of the total FPE of each shot string vs. the air used (ie the efficiency) would also be useful.... Otherwise, great test, thanks for putting in the effort, Joe....

Bob

I agree, and stated that in my review i think the only real difference in the testing was that we used 2 different power settings. Bottom line, each did their job of de-bouncing the hammer equally well.  Problem is I have limited time to prove it.
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: Geoff on March 22, 2016, 12:57:32 PM
thank you for the extensive write-up and taking the time to do so.
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: nervoustrigger on March 22, 2016, 01:01:20 PM
Fantastic, Joe.  Big effort there, thank you for your diligence and for sharing with the GTA community.

Yeah, the efficiency is the main attribute I am interested in between these two approaches so I want to look at your report more closely tonight but I gather from Bob's comment that we don't have enough information to calculate it.  Hopefully you have the information though.  I would have liked to see a comparison with the rifles producing the similar energy so as to more fairly evaluate efficiency, but there are multiple ways of bringing the tunes in line with one another and at least one of them would give an unfair result (transfer port restriction), so that would need to be thought out first.

Thanks again!
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: Joe Brancato on March 22, 2016, 01:52:23 PM
Fantastic, Joe.  Big effort there, thank you for your diligence and for sharing with the GTA community.

Yeah, the efficiency is the main attribute I am interested in between these two approaches so I want to look at your report more closely tonight but I gather from Bob's comment that we don't have enough information to calculate it.  Hopefully you have the information though.  I would have liked to see a comparison with the rifles producing the similar energy so as to more fairly evaluate efficiency, but there are multiple ways of bringing the tunes in line with one another and at least one of them would give an unfair result (transfer port restriction), so that would need to be thought out first.

Thanks again!

IMHO, I think once one eliminates the Hammer Bounce, they've accomplished their task, as nothig else is different (same port, etc.). The differnce woujld be the spring, pre-set, etc. that were used for each test.  If I get the time, I'll lower the FFH to meet the SSG numbers (as it is still installed on the test rifle)
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: FuzzyGrub on March 22, 2016, 02:57:30 PM
As others have said, it would have been nice to equalize all three to the same power level, and for a typical tuned 25 cal Mrod, should be around 40FPE.   Your baseline tune is more of a "low power" tune for a 25 cal.   I do agree, that both devices will probably perform near the same once tuned.  If the gap is adjusted correctly and kept the same, both should eliminate bounce.   Outside of performance though, ease of use, longevity, cost, cocking effort, maximum power level, and other differences may separate the two.   

One thing that appears to be missing on both devices is the ability to lock down the gap adjuster.  Given no tension on it when not cocked, that adjustment can easily creep.   Slight changes in gap, significantly change fps, in the experimentation I have done.
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: nervoustrigger on March 22, 2016, 03:38:15 PM
Hi Joe, that's definitely a reasonable viewpoint, that if it eliminates hammer bounce, it is a success.  "Eliminates" means totally and completely gone so if they both eliminate it, that would show in their efficiencies being essentially the same at the same power level.  Maybe indeed it's a toss up but maybe one or the other is one or two tenths of a fpe/ci better than the other which might indicate some subtle remaining bounce.

I hope I'm not sounding ungrateful in asking the question.  I very much appreciate your effort and don't feel like you owe us anything. 
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: rsterne on March 22, 2016, 04:42:40 PM
I had limited time this morning, more now, and there is enough data to calculate the efficiency of the three strings,so here goes.... This is an MRod, so the volume is 13 CI, and calculating backwards from the FPE and fps, the pellet weight is 25.4 gr.... Here is what I calculated....

Stock.... 22 shots @ 35.7 FPE = 785 FPE total.... Pressure drop = 3100 - 2130 = 970 psi / 14.5 = 67 bar x 13 CI = 870 CI.... Efficiency = 785 / 870 = 0.90 FPE/CI....

SSG.... 34 shots @ 37.5 FPS = 1275 FPE total.... Pressure drop= 2685 - 1915 psi = 770 psi / 14.5 = 53 bar x 13 CI = 690 CI.... Efficiency = 1275 / 690 = 1.85 FPE/CI....

FFH.... 32 shots @ 41.4 FPE = 1325 FPE total.... Pressure drop = 3200 - 2135 = 1065 psi / 14.5 = 73 bar x 13 CI = 955 CI.... Efficiency = 1325 / 955 = 1.39 FPE/CI....

Note that I used the fill and refill pressures given, not the stated difference, which in some cases did not agree....

Bob
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: oldpro on March 22, 2016, 06:25:30 PM

One thing that appears to be missing on both devices is the ability to lock down the gap adjuster.  Given no tension on it when not cocked, that adjustment can easily creep.   Slight changes in gap, significantly change fps, in the experimentation I have done.

It does have a nylon tip set screw that locks down gap adjuster and also you can change springs and tune it without taking gun apart. All metal parts and preload nut is stainless steel not Plastic!!

Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: FuzzyGrub on March 22, 2016, 06:50:08 PM

One thing that appears to be missing on both devices is the ability to lock down the gap adjuster.  Given no tension on it when not cocked, that adjustment can easily creep.   Slight changes in gap, significantly change fps, in the experimentation I have done.

It does have a nylon tip set screw that locks down gap adjuster and also you can change springs and tune it without taking gun apart. All metal parts and preload nut is stainless steel not Plastic!!

Travis,

I didn't know it was your version of the SSG, which I know has that set screw.  The last I saw of your design, the back of the endcap was machined off.   I didn't know you revised it since then.  I also didn't catch the WAR designation in the write-up, but probably missed it.
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: oldpro on March 22, 2016, 07:22:51 PM
 No problem John I was just pointing it out Brother. Im surprised Joe didnt mention where he got both items. Down at bottom of page is pics of parts with set screws etc. visible Id go take pics but im setting in Doctors office LOL. http://wickedairrifles.com/store.html (http://wickedairrifles.com/store.html)
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: FuzzyGrub on March 22, 2016, 09:31:18 PM
Joe,  One of the things I wondered about with the FFH design was adjusting the preload.  It would look like that the steel rivet would just spin in the hammer when you try to increase it.  You mentioned adjusting the gap, but can you adjust the preload without taking it back apart?
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: shorty on March 22, 2016, 10:39:29 PM
Nice work Joe.
Looks like it was a fun project comparing the 2 devices. I wish I could have sent you over one of my springs to include in the testing.

It's interesting to me seeing good pictures of the devices and the output from both of them. It had me thinking, if I were to buy one, which one would I buy ?

So here comes some observations and comments:

SSG:
Prevents hammer preload on valve stem - (IMO - root cause for low efficiency above 1800 psi - "anything under 1800 psi would be considered severe air waisting hammer bounce" )
Smoother more consistent string - most likely because the spring guide is a smooth surface through and through.
Lower fps or fpe due to the spring guide stop at the top of the hammer - less hammer travel
Needs heavier spring to achieve same fps or fpe - due to hammer travel and in turn more cocking effort.
A little extra work to make adjustments.
Machined well and appears as if it would last the life of the gun.
Nearly 70-85 bucks.

FFH:
Prevents hammer preload on valve stem - (IMO - root cause for low efficiency above 1800 psi - "anything under 1800 psi would be considered severe air waisting hammer bounce" )
Inconsistent shot string - Most likely due to spring and guide washer rubbing hard on threads - This could really cause a problem in the hammer chamber with metal fines.
Higher FPS or FPE due to spring guide stop at the top of the hammer - more hammer travel.
Can use a lighter spring to achieve same fps or fpe - due to hammer travel and less cocking effort.
Similar adjustments as stock - maybe a little more work but not repeatable because nothing holds the spring guide in place.
Off the shelf parts at your local hardware store - will not last the life of the gun.
35 bucks I think.

With all that said, I would go with the SSG from Travis (WAR) in my gun. Just for the robust and consistent device. Although, "and you know all know it's coming" 70 to 85 bucks is 1/4 the  price of the gun. Not cool but I can really understand why. Making the parts are costly.

The only recommendation I would make about the the SSG from Travis (WAR) would be to counter sink the head of the SSG spring guide into the face of the hammer to allow for more travel which in turn would allow for a higher FPS/FPE with a lower spring force/cocking effort.
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: oldpro on March 22, 2016, 11:12:12 PM
  I thought about countersinking the striker but there isnt much room between the hammer face and the hole that comes down from the top Plus the hammer is super hard and really a bear to machine. The best bet would be to make a new hammer from scratch designed around the SSG but that would only make it more expensive.  A better way to generate more hammer strike and less spring tension is to cut most of the exposed valve stem off leaving 3-4 mm exposed. 
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: shorty on March 22, 2016, 11:35:08 PM
That sure is another way to get more travel.

It's kind of interesting how only 3 negative turns into the hammer can generate almost an additional 50 fps with the same hammer spring force.

I used a concrete bit (2 bucks) to do my hammer. Cut like butter because they are diamond tipped.
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: int3man on March 22, 2016, 11:38:44 PM
Hi Joe,
             Was the Hammer really stroked out that far on the Stock Marauder?  That seems LARGE.

Thanks!

Just asking.
Michael  :- )
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: oldpro on March 23, 2016, 02:54:55 AM
 I've seen in the HT adjustment all over the place from the factory.
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: FuzzyGrub on March 23, 2016, 08:56:52 AM
FWIW: There is only so much travel you can get out of the Mrod.  I have recessed the striker so far that the hammer starts to hit the valve on the bottom of the curve.   The approx. 0.150" difference in throw of these two designs is probably not a factor.  Neither were adjusted to coil bind to see what their max was.   

Both of the shot curves mirror the issues that I have seen in my DIY SSG attempts.  The Es is greater and/or more erratic than the stock gun at the same 41-42FPE power level I had it at. 
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: Deckard1973 on March 23, 2016, 11:23:59 AM
Thank you Joe for the write up! 
You just helped me make my decision on my next purchase!

Question:  How does one tell if he has a Gen I or Gen II M-Rod?  I bought mine in Feb of 2013.
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: FuzzyGrub on March 23, 2016, 11:28:11 AM
Question:  How does one tell if he has a Gen I or Gen II M-Rod?  I bought mine in Feb of 2013.

The model number on the breech will have XX64 if it is Gen II and the endcap is tapered like in the pictures above.  Gen I will have XX63 model number, and the endcap is squared off.   Also, Gen I has 3 breech mounting bolts to four on Gen II. 
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: Dairyboy on March 23, 2016, 12:16:13 PM
Also gen II have adjustable comb.

And I have a WAR SSG and believe it was totally worth the money. Yes maybe it's 1/4 worth the gun but your gaining a ton of shots, big noise reduction and big air consumption reduction and way simpler tuning also. To me it was well worth it for quality parts and second to none customer service that came with it with all the guess work done already. No brainer to me.
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: Deckard1973 on March 23, 2016, 02:27:45 PM
Question:  How does one tell if he has a Gen I or Gen II M-Rod?  I bought mine in Feb of 2013.

The model number on the breech will have XX64 if it is Gen II and the endcap is tapered like in the pictures above.  Gen I will have XX63 model number, and the endcap is squared off.   Also, Gen I has 3 breech mounting bolts to four on Gen II.

Thank you!
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: PakProtector on March 23, 2016, 08:20:41 PM
  I thought about countersinking the striker but there isnt much room between the hammer face and the hole that comes down from the top Plus the hammer is super hard and really a bear to machine. The best bet would be to make a new hammer from scratch designed around the SSG but that would only make it more expensive.  A better way to generate more hammer strike and less spring tension is to cut most of the exposed valve stem off leaving 3-4 mm exposed.

ON a stock Mrod valve, you can take 2.5mm off the back of the valve too, in addition to another few mm off the valve stem. That will dramatically increase the effective hammer travel.
cheers,
Douglas
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: rsterne on March 23, 2016, 09:04:21 PM
At what point does the hammer start running into other things, like the end of the cocking slot, the bolt, etc.etc?....

Bob
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: oldpro on March 23, 2016, 09:13:28 PM
 It wont Bob . You can drive a flush hammer flush with rear of valve.
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: MassGunman on March 24, 2016, 12:46:43 AM
You lost me at "interpolate" , harder read than a Tom Clancy novel . But seriously , alot of great info . Thanks for taking the time to share your data .
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: Joe Brancato on March 24, 2016, 01:22:06 AM
No problem John I was just pointing it out Brother. Im surprised Joe didnt mention where he got both items. Down at bottom of page is pics of parts with set screws etc. visible Id go take pics but im setting in Doctors office LOL. http://wickedairrifles.com/store.html (http://wickedairrifles.com/store.html)

Travis, My sincerest apology for not cleary stating that this is indeed a WAR SSG. The other designer is SteveNC.  I was up all night writing that article, immediately after shooting the shots, and then the same week I purchased TopGunAirGuns, and dealing with all that. I even missed credit the fact that one of the SSG shots was at 825 F/S, not 815, which technically changes the 20 F/S spread down. I reasoned that since it is an anomaly, I suggest we ignore it and stick with the numbers (basically smoothing out the curve).

Yes, Travis (and to be fair I need to mention Steve) make an awesome SSG, as can be seen when one looks at any of the data.  I can't see having a Marauder without one of these installed.
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: Joe Brancato on March 24, 2016, 01:25:38 AM
You lost me at "interpolate" , harder read than a Tom Clancy novel . But seriously , alot of great info . Thanks for taking the time to share your data .

Interpolate, basically to judge what a number should be that is between data points  ex.. you have 85, 90, 95, x, 105, 110.  One would interpolate x to be 100.

Extrapolate, basically to judge what a number should be that is outside  data points  ex.. you have 85, 90, 95, 100, 105, x.  One would extrapolate x to be 110.
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: Joe Brancato on March 24, 2016, 01:31:40 AM
Nice work Joe.
Looks like it was a fun project comparing the 2 devices. I wish I could have sent you over one of my springs to include in the testing.

It's interesting to me seeing good pictures of the devices and the output from both of them. It had me thinking, if I were to buy one, which one would I buy ?

So here comes some observations and comments:

SSG:
Prevents hammer preload on valve stem - (IMO - root cause for low efficiency above 1800 psi - "anything under 1800 psi would be considered severe air waisting hammer bounce" )
Smoother more consistent string - most likely because the spring guide is a smooth surface through and through.
Lower fps or fpe due to the spring guide stop at the top of the hammer - less hammer travel
Needs heavier spring to achieve same fps or fpe - due to hammer travel and in turn more cocking effort.
A little extra work to make adjustments.
Machined well and appears as if it would last the life of the gun.
Nearly 70-85 bucks.

FFH:
Prevents hammer preload on valve stem - (IMO - root cause for low efficiency above 1800 psi - "anything under 1800 psi would be considered severe air waisting hammer bounce" )
Inconsistent shot string - Most likely due to spring and guide washer rubbing hard on threads - This could really cause a problem in the hammer chamber with metal fines.
Higher FPS or FPE due to spring guide stop at the top of the hammer - more hammer travel.
Can use a lighter spring to achieve same fps or fpe - due to hammer travel and less cocking effort.
Similar adjustments as stock - maybe a little more work but not repeatable because nothing holds the spring guide in place.
Off the shelf parts at your local hardware store - will not last the life of the gun.
35 bucks I think.

With all that said, I would go with the SSG from Travis (WAR) in my gun. Just for the robust and consistent device. Although, "and you know all know it's coming" 70 to 85 bucks is 1/4 the  price of the gun. Not cool but I can really understand why. Making the parts are costly.

The only recommendation I would make about the the SSG from Travis (WAR) would be to counter sink the head of the SSG spring guide into the face of the hammer to allow for more travel which in turn would allow for a higher FPS/FPE with a lower spring force/cocking effort.

I will address all questions and comments in a few days. I am at this moment traveling with my son for a class trip for school (going to Sutters Mill & Fort, Capital,  Capitol (didn't know that BOTH were pertinent to law, thought only one was). Will be back this weekend, can respond. I'm going dark on the forums for a couple of days, not hiding, just don't have access while we are traveling.

It was an interesting test, but after about 500 or so pellets, I would have literally paid my helper to finish it for me if he was around on the weekends.

Cheers all.
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: Deckard1973 on March 29, 2016, 02:57:56 PM
Ok.
What am I doing wrong?
I got my HDD from WAR yesterday.  Installed it.  I left the end cap hex screw in the same position as it was shipped.  Same with the spring guide rod lock nut.  Installed the end cap hex screw was pushing up against the valve pin (for lack of better words) and all the air I was pumping in, came right out of the transfer port.  So, I unscrewed the end cap hex screw out until the air stopped leaking out through the transfer port. 
Reassembled the M-Rod, and I shot three 10 shot strings from a 3000PSI fill (per the Benji hand pump gage) using JSB 18.13grn pellets:
1)
864.6
834.7
838.6
830.2
827.5
828.0
821.0
800.7
830.5
807.6
End PSI: 2500 (per the M-Rod gage)

2)
824.2
821.0
810.1
810.9
792.9
799.1
794.4
781.7
773.2
792.6
End PSI:  2200

3)
768.2
757.3
764.9
756.0
750.4
736.5
736.3
732.7
726.1
643.5
End PSI:  1900

IIRC, with the stock hammer after 30 shots, my end PSI was at 2000. 
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: Deckard1973 on March 29, 2016, 03:06:42 PM
Is it supposed to be this far out?
And what is the screw on the end cap for?


Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: oldpro on March 29, 2016, 03:15:22 PM
 No it shouldnt be that far out and the set screw on the side is to stop the end gap adjuster from moving after tuning.
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: sr1sws on March 30, 2016, 08:27:08 AM
I'll probably demonstrate my complete lack of understanding of the dynamics involved:  would the SSG or FFH benefit a regulated Marauder?

Thanks!
Steve
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: SuburbanMe on March 30, 2016, 08:34:35 AM
wouldn't it just be better to buy a regulator and install it?
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: Joe Brancato on March 30, 2016, 09:17:33 AM
wouldn't it just be better to buy a regulator and install it?

No,. totally different ideas and issues.

The SSG and FFH control hammer bounce. Hammer bounce continues to pump air out the valve AFTER the first hit from the hammer sends out the pellet. (subsequent hammer bouncing just makes more noise and wastes air).

A reg just keeps the system at the proper pressure. It doesn't make the gun more air efficient.
With the SSG, I got 2.46 times more shots out of a Great White than without the SSG due to greater number of shots per Marauder fill, and less air needed to fill the Marauder for each fill.
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: Dairyboy on March 30, 2016, 09:48:41 AM
I'll probably demonstrate my complete lack of understanding of the dynamics involved:  would the SSG or FFH benefit a regulated Marauder?

Thanks!
Steve

Yes because even though it's regulated it still will have hammer bounce so you can get even more shots and will be quieter.
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: ztirffritz on March 30, 2016, 10:16:11 AM
Who makes the SSG that AoA is selling?  They don't credit Bob at all and aren't calling it an SSG but looks like basically the same idea.

http://www.airgunsofarizona.com/CustomParts.htm#MrodFFH (http://www.airgunsofarizona.com/CustomParts.htm#MrodFFH)
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: sr1sws on March 30, 2016, 10:47:07 AM
I'll probably demonstrate my complete lack of understanding of the dynamics involved:  would the SSG or FFH benefit a regulated Marauder?

Thanks!
Steve

Yes because even though it's regulated it still will have hammer bounce so you can get even more shots and will be quieter.

Great, thanks!
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: Joe Brancato on March 30, 2016, 11:33:34 AM
Who makes the SSG that AoA is selling?  They don't credit Bob at all and aren't calling it an SSG but looks like basically the same idea.

http://www.airgunsofarizona.com/CustomParts.htm#MrodFFH (http://www.airgunsofarizona.com/CustomParts.htm#MrodFFH)


The "FFH"  offered by that vendor is made by SteveNC .  A later comment by someone in this thread states that SteveNC does credit Mr. Sterne in a number of his posts.

If you look at the pictures of the FFH I tested and the SSG I tested, you will note the parts in each kit look entirely different.

As a foonote, I got an email stating that particular vendor also offering them wanted to have SteveNC drop me as a dealer for that item, as they wanted to be exclusive for that item. The offer was refused by SteveNC and I will offer it separately or installed when the Maruader is purchased.

The SSG was made by Travis.  Travis credits Mr. Sterne.
I will offer the SSG separately or installed when the Maruader is purchased.

Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: nervoustrigger on March 30, 2016, 11:48:15 AM
Joe, Steve did indeed credit Bob when he posted about it on the yellow forum, at least on two separate occasions that I saw.  I have not been to AoA's site so I don't know about that.
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: ztirffritz on March 30, 2016, 12:41:59 PM
The only reason that I asked about the AoA SSG/FFH was that I recalled somewhere that Bob wrote that he didn't mind people selling SSGs based on his design, but he asked to be credited for the idea/design.  I realize that doesn't make a legal obligation, but as a relatively small community, I think Bob's contributions are well known across many forums, even ones that he doesn't participate in.  It would be nice to give credit where credit is due.  I tried to find where I read that from Bob, but I couldn't find it, so maybe I imagined it, or maybe it was on another forum. 
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: Joe Brancato on March 30, 2016, 02:38:03 PM
Joe, Steve did indeed credit Bob when he posted about it on the yellow forum, at least on two separate occasions that I saw.  I have not been to AoA's site so I don't know about that.

Then I will correct my post.  Thank you for pointing that out. I want to be as fair to all as possible. Steve and Travis have been very helpful.
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: oldpro on March 30, 2016, 08:16:03 PM
 Joe thanks for taking the time to do this its very professional looking and easy to follow. Much thanks my friend. P.S. Keep selling top notch stuff Brother its the only way to go.
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: rsterne on March 31, 2016, 12:00:07 AM
To clarify Steve_in_NC did credit me when he first started developing the SSG concept.... Once he changed the name to his "Free Flight Hammer" (FFH) all mention of the work I did in pioneering it ceased.... I don't ask to be paid for my ideas, which I freely share with the airgun community, but it's nice when my contributions are recognized....

It is what it is....  ::)

Bob
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: oldpro on March 31, 2016, 12:08:12 AM
 Im going to change the name also  to BTFFH (better than free flight hammer) LOL. Credit were credit is due.  The SSG is a device that eliminates hammer bounce and makes tuning a breeze! It was developed by Bob Sterne from the GTA and further developed by WAR to fit inside the Marauder air rifle with no mods at all. This device will make your gun quieter due to no hammer bounce that blows extra air out of the barrel ! It will GREATLY increase your shot count and in some cases has doubled the shot count per fill. This is a must have for the marauder enthusiast...     That is how I described it and didnt forget to put the GTA in there also. Ethics is something that can be learned, thought and shared but  seldom is.
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: rsterne on March 31, 2016, 01:25:36 AM
I should add that Travis asked my permission before working on an SSG to market, I gave him my blessing, but asked that he credit me.... True to his word, he did just that, and continues to do so, and I thank him for doing so....

Bob
Title: Re: My Test Results with an SSG, and FFH (HDD) installed, vs. a Stock Marauder
Post by: Joe Brancato on March 31, 2016, 09:24:07 AM
Joe thanks for taking the time to do this its very professional looking and easy to follow. Much thanks my friend. P.S. Keep selling top notch stuff Brother its the only way to go.

Thank Travis.  I need to update a few areas on the review, but the time just seems to melt away, no matter how early I start and late I finish.
The shooting took quite a few pellets, and the writing of the article came when I was in the middle of other business matters, so it was a crazy time. I'm going to update the review when I get back from picking up some invntory from Arizona. 

After I check out these Hubens I just got in, I'll come up for air and take the review from 80% finished to 95%.