If you offer these up for sale, why not offer sand/polish as an option with extra cost to reflect the work involved? I for one do not care for flash- I care if it works, and works well. Your mags seem to look like they do, and that's all that should really matter. The colors, polish, camo dip (if you can find a dipper who will work with you on price), all that should be a secondary concern.
Quote from: YEMX212 on January 10, 2015, 12:21:46 AMIf you offer these up for sale, why not offer sand/polish as an option with extra cost to reflect the work involved? I for one do not care for flash- I care if it works, and works well. Your mags seem to look like they do, and that's all that should really matter. The colors, polish, camo dip (if you can find a dipper who will work with you on price), all that should be a secondary concern.I think you hit my exact thoughts. I think I might loose my sanity if I had to polish every single one of these haha. The pellets can be seen easily through the front of the already clear face. I prefer the polished look, but definitely not necessary.
Don't suppose anyone with a scoped benjamin marauder would want to check if this 15 round magazine would fit on their gun. I have a bullpup so no issues for me haha
With the amount of work involved, plus the possible ability of getting a smaller mag due to the programming, $50 is a deal!! Here's why, and keep in mind these are prices from a reputable airgun dealer:BSA 10 shot: $82.50Daystate Harrier X & Mk3: $119.95FX Cyclone (No moving parts!): $30FX 12 shot: $89.95I feel that $50 for a U.S. made mag, that can be modular, with this level of quality is absolutely worth it. Even at $60 for the 15 shot is still well below all the other mags I listed above, that have moving parts!
I think that it would help to get the pellets closer together which would give less movement between shots. I feel it would be less damage to the pellets with less movement. I get better groups with single shot feeder I made than with magazine. Prefer the magazine for convenience. I load up my 12 magazines and shoot 3 40 shot strings.
Quote from: EJB on January 13, 2015, 12:24:08 PMI think that it would help to get the pellets closer together which would give less movement between shots. I feel it would be less damage to the pellets with less movement. I get better groups with single shot feeder I made than with magazine. Prefer the magazine for convenience. I load up my 12 magazines and shoot 3 40 shot strings.Their is actually a semi circular geometry in the bottom side of the aluminum piece. And also an inside retaining ring in the main housing piece. All the pellets are held very securely and consistent. With a high quality pellet you can't even hear the pellets rattling when u shake the magazine.