Would this high side filter be okay with a shoebox compressor?
I know this a crazy question but does this filter work as it comes without any modifications?
Quote from: YEMX on July 06, 2017, 09:52:26 PMWould this high side filter be okay with a shoebox compressor? I have mine on a Shoebox Max, and it is performing beautifully.
Quote from: rnabholz on July 07, 2017, 12:02:05 AMQuote from: YEMX on July 06, 2017, 09:52:26 PMWould this high side filter be okay with a shoebox compressor? I have mine on a Shoebox Max, and it is performing beautifully.Excellent!!Have you noticed any significant increase in fill times? I would assume, with this on the high end, and another desiccant on the low (input) end, it would slow the fill time a bit. This of course, is assuming that y'all are running a low side filter of some sort.
Quote from: YEMX on July 07, 2017, 09:51:11 PMQuote from: rnabholz on July 07, 2017, 12:02:05 AMQuote from: YEMX on July 06, 2017, 09:52:26 PMWould this high side filter be okay with a shoebox compressor? I have mine on a Shoebox Max, and it is performing beautifully.Excellent!!Have you noticed any significant increase in fill times? I would assume, with this on the high end, and another desiccant on the low (input) end, it would slow the fill time a bit. This of course, is assuming that y'all are running a low side filter of some sort.Edit: Sorry didn't realize you were asking for a shoebox. I don't have any experience there.
You guys are such enablers! I've placed my order for the Chinese filter tube...
Quote from: YEMX on July 08, 2017, 07:46:55 AMYou guys are such enablers! I've placed my order for the Chinese filter tube... At this point I think drugs would have been cheaper and easier to kick than air rifles.
Awesome update! Thanks Rod. Glad to have some proof that this is actually doing something and not just hocus pocus.
If my calculations are correct, that .02 pound difference is a little more than 12% of the water capacity by weight of the media. So it was at 50% of the total rated 25% moisture absorption capacity by weight. Cool!Taso
That, or the +/- .02 accuracy of the scale. Kidding. Pessimist in me coming out. I think those are fine results. What's the resolution on that scale? I have a cheap jeweler's scale that weighs down to grains which would be more accurate. But in my haste I failed to weigh my molecular sieve material before use. I had wanted to weigh before use and then weigh them moist. Maybe next time 'round. But I probably won't and have faith in your results that what we've done is worthy.Thanks for the update. Very nice.ETA: obviously the resolution is either .002 or down to .001 lbs. What I meant was what's the maximum and minimum readings and accuracy of that scale? The smaller scales are better for measuring that small amount of material.