Thank you to our advertisers!







Author Topic: Ballistics Coefficients - Time for a Change?  (Read 18759 times))

Offline Taso1000

  • GTA Senior Contributor
  • ******
  • Posts: 3597
  • yes
  • Real Name: Taso
Re: Ballistics Coefficients - Time for a Change?
« Reply #80 on: January 11, 2018, 10:49:39 PM »
Pellgunfun

"...nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."  Ripley

  • Orland Park, Illinois

Offline Nvreloader

  • GTA Senior Contributor
  • ******
  • Posts: 3872
  • Real Name: Don
Re: Ballistics Coefficients - Time for a Change?
« Reply #81 on: January 12, 2018, 01:17:31 PM »
I just seen a magazine article that tests pellets BC via Lab Radar,
17,22,25,30 calibers.

I don't think I can name the mag here........... ;)
But have posted the info in the Airgun Guild site.

Tia,
Don
  • Western  NV
Sheridan 64/67 yr models, 20 cal/Hammerli 850 Air Mag -17 cal x 2, + 22 cal /QB-79 - 22 cal /Guantlet - 22 cal / Crosman 150 - 22 cal, Second Variant Model /Crosman 160 - 1st Variant Model - 22 cal /MRod Varmint 22 cal /Sentry 705-2 - 22 cal /Sentry 705 - 9T - 25 cal / Dar 17 cal /22 cal Discovery
CF 4500 45 min SCBA tanks x 3, w/SB F-10 compressor

"Speeds fine, but Accuracy is final"

"We must reject the idea that every time a law's broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker,
It is time to restore the American precept, that each individual is accountable for their actions."
Ronald Reagan