I will join the last three responders.Absolute junk?
Too many aberations and edge softness.Looking through that poorly designed scope will cause many headaches.
Quote from: BarnyDaddy on July 29, 2016, 06:51:21 PMI will join the last three responders.Absolute junk?Yes, I'm trying to sell mine, but I will say it is definitely not junk. No, it's not a Leupold or a Nikon, but for <$100 it is a very good scope. If you do a search you'll find countless positive reviews of this particular scope. I'm selling mine only because I have too many scopes.
Quote from: wjjones on July 29, 2016, 08:46:11 PMQuote from: BarnyDaddy on July 29, 2016, 06:51:21 PMI will join the last three responders.Absolute junk?Yes, I'm trying to sell mine, but I will say it is definitely not junk. No, it's not a Leupold or a Nikon, but for <$100 it is a very good scope. If you do a search you'll find countless positive reviews of this particular scope. I'm selling mine only because I have too many scopes.Too many scopes or too few rifles?Jim
Quote from: BarnyDaddy on July 29, 2016, 11:48:48 PMToo many aberations and edge softness.Looking through that poorly designed scope will cause many headaches. that is opposite then what I have found. but I guess you got $3000 dollar kahles scopes on all your rifle
Quote from: mista meener on August 01, 2016, 12:17:12 PMQuote from: BarnyDaddy on July 29, 2016, 11:48:48 PMToo many aberations and edge softness.Looking through that poorly designed scope will cause many headaches. that is opposite then what I have found. but I guess you got $3000 dollar kahles scopes on all your rifleI too made negative comments on this scope and can assure you I have never spent more than $150 on a scope. The thing is well built and holds zero well but the quality of the glass is not up to the usual UTG standards. I would also agree that the reticle is a bit thick for precision target shooting but will work just fine for hunting and casual target sessions. IMHO there are better options out there in the same price range.Brian